May 14th, 2008
 

Berkeley Bibliography

The bibliography provided below includes only items not already present in T.E. Jessop's Bibliography of George Berkeley (1973) or in Colin M. Turbayne's "A Bibliography of George Berkeley 1963-1979," in Turbayne (1982). The  Berkeley Bibliography is meant to be a supplement to these resources.

The Berkeley Bibliography is maintained and updated by Silvia Parigi. Please submit updates and omissions in this bibliography to her (contact information available on the editorial page).

Berkeley Bibliography in .rtf format (Shift right-click to download)  
 

 

A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W  XYZ

Abad, Juan Vázques, “Observaciones sobre la noción de causa en el opusculo sobre el movimiento de Berkeley,” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986), 35-44.

Abelove, H., “George Berkeley’s attitude to John Wesley: the evidence of a lost letter,” Harvard Theological Review 70 (1977), 175-76.

Adamczykowa, Izabella, “The role of the subject in the cognitive process after George Berkeley: passive for active subject?,” Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie Sklodowska, Sectio 1 Philosophia-Sociologia 6 (1981), 43-57.

Agassi, Joseph, “The future of Berkeley’s instrumentalism,” International Studies in Philosophy 7 (1975), 167-178.

Airaksinen, Timo, “Berkeley and the justification of beliefs [Abstract],” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985), 9.

Airaksinen, Timo, “Berkeley and the justification of beliefs,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48 (1987), 235-256.

Alfonso, Louis, E., “The Notes on the government and population of the Kingdom of Naples and Berkeley’s probable route to Sicily,” Berkeley Newsletter 11 (1989/90), 20-27.

Allaire, Edwin B., “Berkeley’s idealism: yet another visit,” in Muehlmann (1995), 23-38.

Ameeri, Javed Iqbal, “Factors and main trends in early British empiricism. An overview,” Journal of European Studies 8 (1992), 78-93.

Anapolitanos, D. A. , “The continuous and the discrete: Leibniz versus Berkeley and Locke,” Philosophical Inquiry 13 (1991), 1-24.

Ariotti, Piero, “Benedetto Castelli and George Berkeley as anticipators of recent findings on the moon illusion,” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 9 (1973), 328-332.

Armogathe, Jean-Robert, “Proofs of the existence of God,”, in Garber (1998), 305-330.

Armstrong, D. M., “The heart of Berkeley’s metaphysics. A reply to Ernest Sosa,” Hermathena 139 (1985), 162-164.

Arsi’c, Branka, The passive eye: gaze and subjectivity in Berkeley (via Beckett), (Stanford, Cal.: Stanford University Press, 2003).

Asfour, Amal and Williamson, Paul, “Splendid impositions: Gainsborough, Berkeley, Hume,” Eighteenth-Century Studies 31 (1998), 403-432.

Asher, W. O., “Berkeley on absolute motion,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 4 (1987), 447-466.

Atherton, Margaret, “The coherence of Berkeley’s theory of mind,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 43 (1983), 389-400.

Atherton, Margaret, Berkeley’s revolution in vision (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990).

Atherton, Margaret, “Corpuscles, mechanism, and essentialism in Berkeley and Locke,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1991), 47-67.

Atherton, Margaret, “Berkeley without God,” in Muehlmann (1995), 231-248.

Atherton, Margaret, “Lady Mary Shepherd’s case against George Berkeley,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy  4 (1996), 347-366.

Atherton, Margaret, “How to write the history of vision: understanding the relationship between Berkeley and Descartes,” in Levin (1997).

Atherton, Margaret, “How to write the history of vision: understanding the relationship between Berkeley and Descartes”, in Levin (1997).

Atherton, Margaret, The empiricists: critical essays on Locke, Berkeley, and Hume (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999).

Atherton, Margaret, “Apprendre à voir: les enseignements de la Défense de la Théorie de la vision,” in Berlioz (2003), 135-157.

Atherton, Margaret, “Comment Berkeley parvient à maintenir que la neige est blanche,” in Charles (2004), 127-144.

Ayers, Michael and Garber, Daniel, “Theories of knowledge and belief,” in Garber (1998), 1003-1061.

Ayers, Michael and Garber, Daniel, “Ideas and objective being,” in Garber (1998), 1062-1107.

Ayers, M. R., “Berkeley’s immaterialism and Kant’s transcendental idealism,” Idealism Past and Present (1982), 51-69.

Ayers, M. R., “Berkeley and the meaning of existence,” History of European Ideas 7 (1986), 567-574.

Baber, H. E., “Berkeley and the tattletale paradox,” Idealistic Studies 19 (1989), 79-82.

Baier, Annette, “The intentionality of intentions,” Review of Metaphysics 30 (1977), 389-414.

Baladi, Naguib, “Plotin et l’immatérialisme de Berkeley: témoignage de la Siris,” in Plotino e il neoplatonismo in Oriente e in Occidente (Roma: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, 1974), 597-604.

Barber, Kenneth F. And Gracia, Jorge J. E., eds., Individuation and Identity in Early Modern Philosophy (Albany: SUNY Press, 1994).

Baum, Robert J., “The instrumentalist and formalist elements of Berkeley’s philosophy of mathematics,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 3 (1972), 119-134.

Baxter, Donald, “Abstraction, inseparability and identity,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (1997), 307-330.

Baxter, D. L. M., “Berkeley, perception and identity,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (1991), 85-98.

Beal, M. W., “Berkeley’s deletions,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (1976), 455-478.

Belfrage, Bertil, “A new dating of Berkeley’s Draft Introduction,” Berkeley Newsletter 1 (1977), 10-11.

Belfrage, Bertil, “Notes by Berkeley on moral philosophy,” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978), 4-7.

Belfrage, Bertil, “Review of Berkeley, Philosophical commentaries. Edited by George Thomas,” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978), 10.

Belfrage, Bertil, “Review of George Pitcher, Berkeley,” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978), 10.

Belfrage, Bertil, “A summary of Berkeley’s metaphysics in a hitherto unpublished Berkeleian manuscript,” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979), 1-4.

Belfrage, Bertil, “Review of Berkeley, Philosophisches Tagebuch. Translated by Wolfgang Breidert,” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979), 17-19.

Belfrage, Bertil, “Review of Edwin S. Gaustad, George Berkeley in America,” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980), 16-17.

Belfrage, Bertil, “Corrigenda to ‘A summary of Berkeley’s metaphysics’,” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980), 19.

Belfrage, Bertil, “Review of Berkeley, Drei Dialogen zwischen Hulas und Philonous. Introduced by Wolfgang Breidert,” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980), 17.

Belfrage, Bertil, “The Newport extract of Berkeley’s Passive Obedience,” Berkeley Newsletter 5 (1981), 6-9.

Belfrage, Bertil, “An obscure supplement to volume one of Berkeley’s Works,” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83), 17-21.

Belfrage, Bertil, “Dating Berkeley’s Notebook B,” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984), 7-13.

Belfrage, Bertil, “Facts concerning Berkeley’s Notebooks,” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984), 17-22.

Belfrage, Bertil, “Strata in Berkeley’s Notebooks [Abstract],” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985), 10-11.

Belfrage, Bertil, “The clash on semantics in Berkeley’s Notebook A,” Hermathena 139 (1985), 117-26.

Belfrage, Bertil, “The order and dating of Berkeley’s Notebooks,” Revue internationale de philosophie 154 (1985), 196-214.

Belfrage, Bertil, “Berkeley’s theory of emotive meaning (1708),” History of European Ideas 7 (1986), 643-649.

Belfrage, Bertil, “Development of Berkeley’s early theory of meaning,” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986), 319-330.

Belfrage, Bertil, “Une nouvelle édition de Berkeley,” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986), 367-372.

Belfrage, Bertil, ed., George Berkeley’s Manuscript Introduction. An editio diplomatica transcribed and edited with introduction and commentary (Oxford: Doxa, 1987).

Belfrage, Bertil, “A response to M. A. Stewart’s ‘Berkeley’s Introduction Draft’,” Berkeley Newsletter 12 (1991/92), 1-10.

Belfrage, Bertil, “The constructivism of Berkeley’s New Theory of Vision,” in Cummins and Zoeller (1992), 167-186.

Belfrage, Bertil, “Berkeley,” in Yolton, J. W., Price, J. V., Stephens, J., eds., The Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century British Philosophers (Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1999), 84-90.

Belfrage, Bertil, “Vers une nouvelle interprétation de la Théorie de la vision de Berkeley,” in Berlioz (2003), 159-211.

Bellemare, Pierre and Raynor, David, “Berkeley’s letters to le Clerc (1711),” Hermathena 146 (1989), 7-23.

Benítez, Laura, “El espíritu como principio activo en Berkeley,” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986), 23-34.

Bennett, Jonathan, “On translating Locke, Berkeley and Hume into English,” Teaching Philosophy 17 (1994), 261-269.

Bennett, Jonathan, Learning from six philosophers: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001).

Benschop, Hans Peter, Berkeley on method and metaphysics, Ph. D. dissertation (University of Leiden, 1992).

Benschop, Hans Peter, “Berkeley, Lee and abstract ideas,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 5 (1997), 55-66.

Benson, Charles, “Prior’s authentic narrative,” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979), 14-15.

Ben-Zeev, A., “Reexamining Berkeley’s notion of suggestion,” Conceptus 23 (1989), 21-30.

Berlioz, Dominique, “G. Berkeley: ‘Of Infinites’,” Revue philosophique (1982), 45-57.

Berlioz, Dominique, “ ‘To stand for’ et ‘to represent’ dans l’Introduction manuscrite de Berkeley,” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986), 331-338.

Berlioz, Dominique, Berkeley. Un nominalisme réaliste (Paris: J. Vrin, 2000).

Berlioz, Dominique, “Vision et géométrie chez Berkeley,” in Charles (2004), 145-161.

Berman, David, “Berkeley’s letter to H. Clarke,” Berkeley Newsletter 1 (1977), 9.

Berman, David, “Mrs. Berkeley’s annotations in her interleaved copies of An Account of the Life of Berkeley (1776),” Hermathena (1977), 15-28.

Berman, David, “A new Berkeley portrait,” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978), 8-9.

Berman, David, “A note on Berkeley and his Catholic countrymen,” Long Room 16-17 (1978), 26-28.

Berman, David, “Berkeley’s letter to Lord Orrey,” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979), 12-13.

Berman, David, “Berkeley’s departure for America: a new letter.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980), 14.

Berman, David, “Berkeley’s philosophical reception after America,” Archiv fûr Geschichte der Philosophie 62 (1980), 311-320.

Berman, David, “Bishop Berkeley and the fountains of living waters,” Hermathena 128 (1980), 21-31.

Berman, David, Cognitive theology and emotive mysteries in Berkeley’s Alciphron,” Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy (1981), 219-229.

Berman, David, “Did Berkeley write Guardian 130?,” Berkeley Newsletter 5 (1981), 10-13.

Berman, David and Berman, Jill. “The fountains portraits of Bishop Berkeley,” Apollo (1982), 76-79.

Berman, David, “Beckett and Berkeley,” Irish University Review (1984), 42-45.

Berman, David, “Review of The Guardian, edited by John Calhoun Stephens,” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984), 23-26.

Berman, David, “Berkeley and the moon illusion,” Revue internationale de philosophie 154 (1985), 215-222.

Berman, David, “George Berkeley: pictures by Goldsmith, Yeats and Luce,” Hermathena 139 (1985), 9-23.

Berman, David, “Berkeley’s semantic revolution: 19 November 1707 — 11 January 1708,” History of European Ideas 7 (1986), 603-608.

Berman, David, “Berkeley’s Siris and the ‘whiskey patriots’,” Eighteenth-Century Ireland, 1, (1986), 200-203.

Berman, David, “The Jacobitism of Berkeley’s Passive Obedience,” Journal of the History of Ideas 47 (1986), 309-319.

Berman, David, ed., George Berkeley. Eighteenth-century responses, 2 vols. (New York-London: Garland, 1989), in Pitcher (1988-1989).

Berman, David, ed., George Berkeley, Alciphron, or the minute philosopher: in focus (London; New York: Routledge, 1993).

Berman, David, George Berkeley: idealism and the man (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).

Bermudez, Jose Luis, “The adequacy of simple ideas in Locke . A rehabilitation of Berkeley’s criticisms,” Locke Newsletter 23, 347-354.

Bernabei, Andrea, “Il ‘cieco di Molyneux’: un problema di percezione visiva nella Francia illuminista,” Rivista critica di storia della filosofia 30 (1975), 132-166.

Bertini, Daniele, (ed.), George Berkeley, Saggio su una nuova teoria della visione-Trattato sui principi della conoscenza umana, (Milano: R.C.S., 2004);

Bertini, Daniele, (ed.), George Berkeley, Alcifrone, (Milano: R.C.S., 2005);

Beyhl, Helmut, Bischof Berkeley, der Mann, der den gesunden Menschenverstand tanzen lässt: das ‘Problem’ des Beweises der Realität der Außenwelt (Berlin: Freie Universität Dissertation, 1990).

Beyssade, Jean-Marie, “L’expérience du rêve et l’extétiorité (de Descartes à Berkeley),” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger, 111 (1986), 355-366.

Beyssade, Jean-Marie, “Philosophie et apologétique chez Berkeley,” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986), 377-384.

Blackith, Robert, “A Berkeleian time-warp,” Berkeley Newsletter 10 (1987/88), 1-4.

Blake, J. B., “Addenda to Keynes: a bibliography of Berkeley,” Bibliographical Society of America Papers 73 (1979), 337-340.

Bonk, Sigmund, Immaterialismus: Darstellung und Verteidigung von George Berkeleys Gottesbeweis und immaterialistischem Weltbild (München, 1990).

Bonk, Sigmund, “George Berkeleys Gottesbeweis,” Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 36 (1994), 268-283.

Bonk, Sigmund, “George Berkeleys Nachweis einer gottlichen Vorsehung,” Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 39 (1997), 176-190.

Bonk, Sigmund, “George Berkeley’s theory of time: ‘A-total-disaster’,” Studia Leibnitiana 29 (1997), 198-210.

Bonk, Sigmund, “We see God”: George Berkeley’s philosophical theology (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1997).

Bonk, Sigmund, Abschied von der Anima mundi: die britische Philosophie im Vorfeld der industriellen Revolution (Freiburg, Breisgau: Alber, 1999).

Borges, Jorge Luis, “Berkeley’s Crossroads,” Berkeley Newsletter 14 (1995/96), 5-12.

Bozovic, Miran, Der grosse Andere: Gotteskonzepte in der Philosophie der Neuzeit (Wien: Turia und Kant, 1993).

Bracken, Harry M., “Berkeley: Irish Cartesian,” Philosophical Studies 24 (1976), 39-51.

Bracken, Harry M., “Bayle, Berkeley, and Hume,” Eighteenth-Century Studies 11 (1977), 227-245.

Bracken, Harry M., “Realism and Greek philosophy: what Berkeley saw and Burnyeat missed [Abstract],” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985), 10.

Bracken, Harry M., “Realism and Greek philosophy: what Berkeley saw and Burnyeat missed,” Hermathena 139 (1985), 63-80.

Bracken, Harry M., “On some points in Bayle, Berkeley, and Hume,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 4 (1987), 435-446.

Bradatan, Costica, “Berkeley and Liber Mundi," Minerva. An Internet Journal of Philosophy 3 (1999), University of Limerick, Ireland.

Bradatan, Costica, “Waiting for the eschaton: Berkeley’s ‘Bermuda scheme’ between Earthly Paradise and educational utopia”, Utopian Studies 14 (2003), 36-50.

Bradatan, Costica, "Philosophy as Palimpsest. In Search for an Immemorial Wisdom," Existentia. An International Journal of Philosophy 14
(2004), 337-344.

Bradatan, Costica, ”'God is Dreaming You': Narrative as Imitatio Dei in Miguel de Unamuno, " Janus Head - A Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Continental Philosophy, Literature, Phenomenological Psychology and the Arts, 7 (2004), 453-46.

Bradatan, Costica, “Review: Branka Arsic, The Passive Eye: Gaze and Subjectivity in Berkeley (via Beckett,)” Philosophy 24, (2004), 237-239.

Bradatan, Costica, "'One is All, and All is One.' The Great Chain of Being in Berkeley's Siris" in O'Gorman, Frank and Donald, Diana (eds.), Ordering the World in the Eighteenth Century, (Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), 63-82.

Bradatan, Costica, "George Berkeley's 'Universal Language of Nature'" in Klaas van Berkel, Klaas and Vanderjagt, Arjo (eds.), The Book of Nature in Modern Times (Leuven: Peeters Publishers, 2005), 71-84.

Bradatan, Costica, “Introduction”, in Berkeley, Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge (Barnes & Noble Books, 2006).

Bradshaw, D. E., “Berkeley and Hume on abstraction and generalization,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 5 (1988), 11-22.

Brandt, Reinhard, “Historical observations on the genesis of the three-dimensional optical picture,” Ratio 17 (1975), 176-190.

Breidert, Wolfgang, “Corrigendum,” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978), 13.

Breidert, Wolfgang, “Einleitung” in Berkeley, Drei Dialoge (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1980).

Breidert, Wolfgang, “Die Rezeption Berkeleys in Deutschland im 18 Jahrhundert,” Revue internationale de philosophie 154 (1985), 223-241.

Breidert, Wolfgang, “George Berkeley (1685-1753),” Fridericana Zeitschrift der Universität Karlsruhe 36 (1985), 3-13.

Breidert, Wolfgang, “On some marginal signs in the Philosophical Commentaries,” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985), 7-8.

Breidert, Wolfgang, “With the infinite God against the mathematics of infinity [Abstract],” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985), 11-12.

Breidert, Wolfgang, “Berkeley’s De Ludo Algebraico and Notebook B.” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986), 12-14.

Breidert, Wolfgang, “Berkeley’s Kritik an der Infinitesimalrechnung,” Studia Leibnitiana 14 (1986), 185-191.

Breidert, Wolfgang, “On the early reception of Berkeley in Germany”, in Sosa (1987), 231-241.

Breidert, Wolfgang, ed., George Berkeley, Versuch über eine Theorie des Sehens und Die Theorie des Sehens ... verteidigt und erklär, (Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1987).

Breidert, Wolfgang, “Review: Essays on Berkeley, ed. John Foster and Howard Robinson”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 69 (1987), 315-321.

Breidert, Wolfgang, “Schopenhauer und Berkeley,” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch 69 (1988), 373-385.

Breidert, Wolfgang, George Berkeley 1685-1753 (Basel: Birkhauser, 1989).

Breidert, Wolfgang, "Berkeley, George", in Lexikon für Theologie und Kirche, vol. 2, 1994, col. 260.

Breidert, Wolfgang, George Berkeley, Alciphron oder der Kleine Philosoph, Übers. v. Luise und Friedrich Raab. Mit einer Einleitung versehen und herausgegeben von Wolfgang Breidert, (Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1996).

Breidert, Wolfgang, “Berkeley's sources in mathematics”, in Brykman (1997), 49-58.

Breidert, Wolfgang, “George Berkeley. Philosophie des Immaterialismus”, in Kreimendahl, Lothar (ed.), Philosophen des 18. Jahrhunderts, (Darmstadt, 2000), 68-86.

Breidert, Wolfgang, “Berkeley's defence of infinite God in the contrast to the infinite in mathematics”, in Koetsier, Teun and Bergmans, Luc (eds.), Mathematics and the divine. A historical study (Amsterdam etc.: Elsevier, 2005), 499-508.

Breuninger, Scott Christopher, Morals, the market, and history: George Berkeley and social virtue in early eighteenth-century thought, Dissertation (University of Wisconsin: Madison 2002).

Brolley, Kevin G., “Review of Berkeley by J. O. Urmson,” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83), 22-23.

Brook, Richard, “Berkeley, causality and signification,” International Studies in Philosophy 27 (1995), 15-31.

Brown, Stuart, “Leibniz on Berkeley [Abstract],” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985), 13-14.

Brown, Stuart, “Platonic idealism in modern philosophy from Malebranche to Berkeley,” in Cambridge Platonists in philosophical context (Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Pub., 1997), 197-214.

Brykman, Geneviève, “Berkeley: sa lecture de Malebranche à travers le Dictionaire de Bayle,” Revue internationale de philosophie 29 (1975), 496-514.

Brykman, Geneviève, “Berkeley, lecteur et critique de Spinoza,” Recherches  sur le XVIIème Siècle 2 (1978), 173-192.

Brykman, Geneviève, “Le cartésianisme dans le De Motu,” Revue internationale de philosophie 3 (1979), 553-569.

Brykman, Geneviève, “The close inspection of words and ideas in Berkeley’s writings,” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979), 9-10.

Brykman, Geneviève, “Abstracts of ‘Le Cartesianisme dans le De Motu’ and ‘Pouvoir d’abstraire et notions abstraites chez Berkeley,” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980), 15.

Brykman, Geneviève, “Pouvoir d’abstraire et notions abstraites chez Berkeley,” Recherches sur le XVIIème siècle 4 (1980), 157-166.

Brykman, Geneviève, “Berkeley à Newport: 1729-1779,” Recherches sur le XVIIème Siècle 4 (1980), 167-169.

Brykman, Geneviève, “Berkeley et l’interieur absolu des choses,” Revue philosophique (1980), 421-432.

Brykman, Geneviève, “Philosophy and apologetics in Berkeley,” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83), 12-16.

Brykman, Geneviève, “Le modèle visuel de la connaissance chez Berkeley,” Revue philosophique (1983), 427-441.

Brykman, Geneviève, Berkeley : philosophie et apologétique, 2 vols. (Lille : Atelier National de reproduction des thèses ; Paris : Vrin, 1984).

Brykman, Geneviève, “Pleasure and pain versus ideas in Berkeley [Abstract],” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985), 12-13.

Brykman, Geneviève, “Pleasure and pain versus ideas in Berkeley,” Hermathena 139 (1985), 127-137.

Brykman, Geneviève, “Principe de ressemblance et hétérogénéité des idées chez Berkeley,” Revue internationale de philosophie 154 (1985), 242-251.

Brykman, Geneviève, “L’esprit et les idées visuelles dans la Nouvelle théorie de la vision,” History of European Ideas 7 (1986), 585-591.

Brykman, Geneviève, “Tricentenaire ‘Berkeley’ (1685-1985),” Revue de synthèse 109 (1988), 148-150.  

Brykman, Geneviève, “Sensibles communs et sens commun chez Locke et Berkeley,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale (1991), 515-529.

Brykman, Geneviève, “Review of Berkeley, De Motu, translated into Italian with an introduction by Mariapaola Fimiani,” Berkeley Newsletter 12 (1991/92), 17.

Brykman, Geneviève, Berkeley et le voile des mots (Paris: Vrin, 1993).

Brykman, Geneviève, “Vision, connaissance et ontologie chez Berkeley”, in Monti (1995), 121-137.

Brykman, Geneviève, ed., Berkeley et le cartésianisme (Nanterre: Université Paris X, Nanterre, 1997).

Brykman, Geneviève, “L’hétérogénéité des idées sensibles et le ‘langage de la Nature’ chez Locke et Berkeley,” in Berlioz (2003), 17-46.

Bunnin, N. F., The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996).

Burnyeat, M. F., “Idealism and Greek philosophy: what Descartes saw and Berkeley missed,” Idealism Past and Present (1982), 19-50.

Bustamante, Rodrigo., “La critica de Berkeley al infinito categorico,” Contrafuerte (1985), 28-34.

Byrne, P. A., “Berkeley, scientific realism and creation,” Religious Studies 20 (1984), 453-464.

Caffentzis, George Constantine, Über die Ursachen von “The Querist”: Vademecum zu einem irischen Klassiker der politischen Ökonomie (Düsseldorf: Verl. Wirtschaft und Finanzen, 1999).

Caffentzis, George Constantine, Exciting the industry of mankind: George Berkeley’s philosophy of money (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000).

Caffentzis, George Constantine, “Medical metaphors and monetary strategies in the political economy of Locke and Berkeley,” History of Political Economy 35 (2003: supplement), 204-233.

Camporesi, Cristiano, “Aporie berkeleyane,” Rivista di filosofia 73 (1982), 471-473.

Cantor, Geoffrey N., “Berkeley, Reid and the mathematization of mid-eighteenth-century optics,” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977), 429-448.

Cantor, Geoffrey N., “Two letters relating to Berkeley’s social circle,” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980), 1-3.

Cantor, Geoffrey N., “Berkeley’s The Analyst revisited.,” Isis 75 (1984), 668-683.

Casini, Paolo, “Newton’s Principia and the philosophers of the Enlightenment,” Notes and records of the Royal Society of London 42 (1988), 35-52.

Cates, Lynn D., “Berkeley on the work of the six days,” Faith and Philosophy 14 (1997), 82-86.

Chaney, Edward, The evolution of the Grand Tour since the Renaissance (London: Franck Cass, 1998).

Charles, Sébastien, “L’abbé Raynal, author of an unnoticed review of Berkeley’s Dialogues,” Berkeley Newsletter 15 (1997/98), 14-18.

Charles, Sébastien, “The Siris in the Age of Enlightenment: panacea or imposture?,” Hermathena 168 (2000), 55-69.

Charles, Sébastien, “Hume and Berkeley in the Prussian Academy: Louis Frederic Ancillon’s ‘Dialogue between Berkeley and Hume’ of 1796,”, Hume Studies 27 (2001), 85-97.

Charles, Sébastien, “Ocasionalismo y modernidad: berkeley, lector critico de Malebranche,” Praxis Filosofica 13 (2001), 27-42.

Charles, Sébastien, “Existence et temporalité au Siècle des Lumières: Turgot lecteur de Maupertuis et Berkeley,” Lumen 21 (2002), 45-59.

Charles, Sébastien, Berkeley au siècle des lumières: immatérialisme et scepticisme au XVIIIe siècle (Paris: J. Vrin, 2003).

Charles, Sébastien, “Berkeley occasionaliste malgré lui? De la causalité et de la volonté chez Malebranche et Berkeley,” in Charles (2004), 73-88.

Charles, Sébastien, ed., Science et épistémologie selon Berkeley (Saint-Nicolas, Québec: Les Presses l’Université Laval, 2004).

Chinn, Ewing Y., “The anti-abstractionism of Dignana and Berkeley,” Philosophy East and West 44 (1994), 55-77.

Chiurazzi, G., “Il problema della mediazione nella filosofia di George Berkeley”, Filosofia 49 (1998), 53-75.

Clark, Stephen R. L., Money, obedience, and affection: essays on Berkeley’s moral and political thought (New York: Garland, 1989).

Clasen, Uwe, Die Sehtheorien von René Descartes und George Berkeley im Spiegel der Geschichte der physiologischen Optik (Aachen: Tecn. Hochsch. Diss., 1997).

Collingridge, D. G,. “Berkeley on space, sight and touch.” Philosophy 53 (1978), 102-105.

Conroy, Graham P., “George Berkeley and the Jacobite heresy: some comments on Irish Augustan politics,” Albion 3 (1971), 82.

Cope, Kevin L., “Moral travel and the pursuit of nothing: Vathek and Siris as philosophical monologue,” Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture 18 (1988), 167-186.

Cover, J. A., Central Themes in Early Modern Philosophy (Indianapolis: Hacket, 1990).

Coxito, Amandio Augusto. “Un texto de Luis A. Vernei contra o imaterialismo de Berkeley,” Revista Filosofia de Coimbra 6 (1997), 101-117.

Crain, Steven D., “Must a classical theist be an immaterialist?,” Religious Studies 33 (1997), 81-92.

Creery, Walter E., ed., George Berkeley: critical assessments, 3 vols. (London; New York: Routledge, 1991).

Crombie, Alistair C., George Berkeley bicentenary (New York: Garland, 1988).

Cross, C. B., “Berkeley on other minds,” Auslegung 6 (1978), 45-50.

Cummins, Philli,. “Berkeley’s ideas of sense,” Nous 9 (1975), 55-72.

Cummins, Phillip, “Berkeley’s unstable ontology,” Modern Schoolman 67 (1989), 15-32.

Cummins, Phillip, “Sections nine and ten of Berkeley’s Principles,” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986), 1-5.

Cummins, Phillip and Zoeller, Guenter, eds. Minds, Ideas, and Objects: Essays on the Theory of Representation in Modern Philosophy (Atascadero, California: Ridgeview Publishing Company, 1992).

Danaher, James P., “Is Berkeley’s world a divine language?”, Modern Theology 18 (2002), 361-373.

Dancy, Jonathan, Berkeley: An Introduction (Oxford: Blackwell, 1987).

Dancy, Jonathan, ed., George Berkeley, A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).

Dancy, Jonathan, ed., George Berkeley, Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).

Daniel, Stephen H., “George Berkeley, Francis Suarez, and the esse-existere distinction,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 74 (2000), 621-636.

Daniel, Stephen H., “The Ramist context of Berkeley’s philosophy,” British Journal for the History of philosophy 9 (2001), 487-505.

Daniel, Stephen H., “Edwards, Berkeley, and Ramist logic,” Idealistic Studies 31 (2001), 55-72.

Daniel, Stephen H., “Berkeley’s pantheistic discourse,” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 49 (2001), 179-194.

Daniel, Stephen H., "Berkeley's Christian Neoplatonism, archetypes, and divine ideas," Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (2001), 239-258.

Daniel, Stephen H., “Les limites de la philosophie naturelle de Berkeley,” in Charles (2004), 163-170.

Davis, John W., “The Molyneux problem,” Journal of the History of Ideas 21 (1960), 392-408.

Dégremont, Roselyne, Berkeley (Paris: Ellipses, 1999).

Dégremont, Roselyne, Berkeley. L’idée de nature, (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1995).

De Waal, Cornelis, “The real issue between nominalism and realism: Peirce and Berkeley reconsidered,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 32 (1996), 425-433.

Dicker, Georges, “Two arguments from perceptual relativity in Berkeley’s Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 20 (1982), 409-422.

Dicker, Georges, “Berkeley on the immediate perception of objects,” in Cummins and Zoeller (1992), 201-213.

Di Michele, Stefano, “George Berkeley in America: nostalgia del vedere,” Annali della Facolta di Lettere e Filosofia 39 (1996), 141-163.

Doney, Willis, “Is Berkeley’s a Cartesian mind?,” in Turbayne (1982), 273-282.

Doney, Willis, “Berkeley’s argument against abstract ideas,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 8 (1983), 295-308.

Dooren, W. Van, “Whether there be any reason why Berkeley is so often misunderstood?,” Wijsgerig perspectief op maatschappijen en wetenschap 26 (1985-6).

Downing, Lisa J., “Berkeley’s case against realism about dynamics,” in Muehlmann (1995), 197-216.

Downing, Lisa J., “Siris and the scope of Berkeley’s instrumentalism,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 3 (1995), 279-300.

Drebushenko, D., “Abstraction and a new argument for the Esse-is-percipi thesis,” Hermathena 167, (1999), 35-58.

Dubois, Pierre, L’oeuvre de Berkeley (Paris: Vrin, 1985).

Dunn, John, The British empiricists (Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press, 1992).

Dupas, Jean-Claude, “Le visible et l’invisibile chez Berkeley,” Études irlandaises (1986), 45-56.

Easton, Patricia A., ed., Logic and the Workings of the Mind (Atascadero: Eastview, 1997).

Eaton, Jeffrey C., “Berkeley’s immaterialism and the scientific promise of the Christian doctrine of creation,” Harvard Theological Review 80 (1987), 431-447.

Eberwein, Robert, “Samuel Johnson, George Cheyne, and the ‘cone of being’,” Journal of the history of ideas 36 (1975), 153-158.

Echeverri Saldarriaga, Santiago, “’Subjetividad’ e ‘immaterialismo’en la filosofia de George Berkeley,” Revista colombiana de filosofia de la ciencia 3 (2002), 179-208; republished in Estudios de filosofia 27 (2003), 127-148.

Egan, Frances, “The moon illusion,” Philosophy of Science 65 (1998), 604-623.

Eisenstein, G., “Berkeley’s presence: metaphysical development and dialectical tension,” Idealistic Studies 18 (1988), 207-229.

Enright, J. T., “The moon illusion examined from a new point of view,” Proceedings of the American philosophical society 119 (1975), 87-107.

Evans, J. D. G., “Berkeley on conceiving the unconceived,” Irish Journal of Philosophy 2 (1985), 79-93.

Everitt, Nicholas, “Quasi-Berkelyan idealism as perspicuous theism.,” Faith and Philosophy 14 (1997), 353-377.

Falkenstein, Lorne, “Intuition and construction in Berkeley’s account of physical space,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (1994), 63-84.

Faris, J. A., “Review of Berkele:, critical and interpretative essays edited by C. M. Turbayne,” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984), 26-32.

Fau, Martina, Berkeleys Theorie der visuellen Sprache Gottes: ihre Bedeutung für die Philosophie des Immaterialismus und ihre historischen Würzeln (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1993).

Feuer, Lewis F., “Materialism, idealism and science,” Philosophy of science 15 (1948), 71-75.

Fimiani, Mariapaola, George Berkeley: il nome e l’immagine (Cosenza: Lerici, 1979).

Flage, Daniel E., “Berkeley’s notions,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (1985), 407-425.

Flage, Daniel E., Berkeley’s doctrine of notions: a reconstruction based on his theory of meaning (London: Croom Helm, 1987).

Flage, Daniel E., “Relative ideas and notions,” in Cummins and Zoeller (1992), 235-253.

Flage, Daniel E., “Berkeley, individuation and physical objects,” in Barber and Gracia (1994).

Fleming, N., “Berkeley and idealism,” Philosophy 60 (1985), 300-325.

Flew, Anthony, “Was Berkeley a precursor of Wittgenstein?,” in Berman (1993), 214-226.

Fogelin, Robert, “Hume and Berkeley on the proofs of infinite divisibility,” Philosophical Review 97 (1988), 47-69.

Fogelin, Robert, “The intuitive basis of Berkeley’s immaterialism,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 13 (1996), 331-344.

Fogelin, Robert J., Berkeley and the Principles of Human Knowledge (London and New York: Routledge, 2001).

Forest, Denis, “Language visuel, communication universelle,” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 4 (1997) 429-446.

Foster, John and Robinson, Howard, eds., Essays on Berkeley :a tercentennial celebration (Oxford : Clarendon, 1985).

Fox, Christopher, “Locke and the Scriblerians : the discussion of identity in early eighteenth century England,” Eighteenth-Century Studies 16 (1982), 1-25. 

Frangiotti, Marco Antonio, “Transcendental idealism and phenomenalism,” Critica 26 (1994), 73-95.

Frankel, Henry, “Berkeley’s concept of mind as presented in Book II of the Principles,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 15 (1977), 37-51.

Frederick, R., “Berkeley and the argument from conceiving,” Philosophy Research Archives 13 (1987/88), 481-487.

Friedman, Lesley, “Pragmatism: the unformulated method of Bishop Berkeley,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2003), 81-96.

Furlong, E. J., “A Berkeleian nod?,” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978), 3.

Furlong, E. J., “Some puzzles in Berkeley’s writings,” Hermathena 120 (1976), 63-73.

Furlong, E. J. and Berman, David, “George Berkeley and The Ladies Library,” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980), 4-13.

Garber, Daniel, ed., The Cambridge history of seventeenth century philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).

Gatti, Andrea, Inglesi a Napoli nel viceregno austriaco: Joseph Addison, Lord Shaftesbury, George Berkeley (Napoli: Vivarium, Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici, 2000).

Gaukroger, Stephen, ed., The Uses of Antiquity (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991).

Gaustad, Edwin S., “George Berkeley and the New World community,” Church History 48 (1979), 5-17.

Gaustad, Edwin S., George Berkeley in America (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1979).

Gaustad, Edwin S., “When in the course,” William and Mary Quarterly 52 (1995), 479-482.

Gibson, Ann and Palmer, Lucia, “George Berkeley’s visual language and the new England portrait tradition,” Centennial Review 31 (1987), 122-145.

Glauser, Richard, “Les rélations de significance chez Berkeley,” Studia Philosophica 42 (1983), 165-200.

Glauser, Richard, Berkeley et les philosophes du XVIIe siècle: perception et scepticisme (Sprimont: Mardaga, 1999).

Glauser, Richard, “La structure de la perception médiate dans la théorie berkeleyenne de la vision,” in Berlioz (2003), 103-134.

Glouberman, Mark, “Abstraction and determinacy: the ideological background of Berkeleianism,” Idealistic Studies (1982), 14-34.

Gloubermann, Mark, “Berkeley’s anti-abstractionism,” British Journal of the History of Philosophy 2 (1994), 145-163.

Glouberman, Mark, “Berkeley’s anti-abstractionism: a reply to Moked,” Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 40 (1991), 315-318.

Glouberman, Mark, “Consciousness and cognition: from Descartes to Berkeley,” Studia Leibnitiana 14 (1982), 244-265.

Gottenbarn, Donald, “Berkeley: God’s pain,” Philosophical Studies 28 (1975), 245-254.

Gozzano, Simone, “Mental images and their ontology,” Epistemologia 17 (1994), 225-252.

Graham, Jody, “Common sense and Berkeley’s perception by suggestion,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (1997), 397-423.

Granja, Dulce Maria, “Realismo et idealismo en Berkeley,” Contrafuerte (1985), 19-27.

Gray, J., “Berkeley’s theory of space,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 16 (1978), 415-434.

Grayling, A. C., Berkeley: the central arguments (London: Duckworth, 1986).

Greco, John, “Reid’s critique of Berkeley and Hume: what’s the big idea?,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (1995), 279-296.

Greenberg, A. R., “Reid, Berkeley, and notional knowledge,” Monist 61 (1978), 415-434.

Gruner, Rolf, “Berkeley on general ideas,” Dialogue 8 (1969), 481-85.

Guérnieau, Roselyne, “Berkeley et les Bermudes,” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986), 309-317.

Gutiérrez, Pedro Stepanenko, “La conception berkeleyana del yo,” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986), 13-22.

Hall, Richard A. S., “Did Berkeley influence Edwards: their common critique of the moral sense theory”, in Jonathan Edwards’s writings (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996), 100-121.

Hall, Roland. “ ‘New words in Berkeley’s writings.” Berkeley Newsletter 1 (1977), 4-8.

Hamou, Philippe, “Microscopes et minima visuels. Berkeley critique de l’autopsie instrumentale,” in Charles (2004), 103-126.

Hamou, Philippe, “Sens et fonction de modèle linguistique dans la Nouvelle Théorie de la vision,” in Berlioz (2003), 47-78.

Hanson, Norwood Russell, “The dematerialization of matter,” Philosophy of science 29 (1962), 27-38.

Hanratty, Gerald, “A voice in the wilderness: Berkeley’s response to Enlightenment,” Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 32 (1990), 319-337.

Hardwick, Charles, Berkeley and Peirce, Graduate Studies Texas Tech. University (1981), 81-85.

Harris, Stephen, “Berkeley’s argument from perceptual relativity,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 14 (1997), 99-120.

Hatfield, Gary, “The cognitive faculties,” in Garber (1998), 953-1002.

Hausman, Alan and Hausman, David, “A new approach to Berkeley’s ideal reality,” in Muehlmann (1995), 47-66.

Hausman, Alan and Hausman, David, “On Allaire’s ‘Another visit’,” in Muehlmann (1995), 39-46.

Hausman, Alan and Hausman, David, “Berkeley’s semantic dilemma: beyond the incoherence model,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 13 (1996), 221-238.

Hausman, David B., Descartes’s legacy: minds and meaning in early modern philosophy (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997).

Hayry, Matti and Hayry, Hetta, “Obedience to rules and Berkeley’s theological utilitarianism,” Utilitas 6 (1994), 233-242.

Henze, D. F., “Descartes vs. Berkeley: a study in early modern metaphilosophy,” Metaphilosophy 8 (1977), 147-163.

Hestevold, H. S., “Berkeley’s theory of time,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 7 (1990), 179-192.

Hight, Marc A. and Ott, Walter, “The new Berkeley,”  Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (2004), 1-24.

Hight, Marc A., “Why we do not see what we feel,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83 (2002), 148-162.

Hollingshead, G., “Bishop Berkeley and the gloomy clerk: Pope’s final satire on deism,” Durham University Journal (1982), 19-27.

Hollingshead, G., “Berkeley, Blackwell, and Blackwell’s Homer,” Scottish Literary Journal 11 (1984), 20-35.

Hollingshead, G., “Pope, Berkeley, and the true key to the Dunciad in four books,” English Studies in Canada 10 (1984), 141-155.

Hollingshead, G., “The case for Berkeley’s authorship of The vanity of philosophical Systems,” Eighteenth-Century Life 9 (1985), 51-64.

Hollingshead, G., “Sources for the Ladies’ Library,” Berkeley Newsletter 11 (1989/90), 1-9.

Hone, Joseph M., Bishop Berkeley: his life, writings, and philosophy (London: Faber & Faber, 1931).

Houghton, Raymond, “International Berkeley Society,” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978), 14-15.

Howell, T. J., “The bond of society: Berkeley’s theory of social reality,” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979), 16.

Hughes, M., “Hermes and Berkeley,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (1992), 1-19.

Hurley, Michael, “Berkeley and Methodism: a new letter,” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978), 1-2.

Ibañez, Alejandro Herrera, “La nocion de existencia en la ontologia de Berkeley,” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986), 13-22.

Ichinose, Masaki, “Berkeley on practical spirit,” Philosophical Studies 14 (1995), 1-17.

Imlay, Robert A., “Berkeley and scepticism: a fatal dalliance,” Hume Studies 18 (1992), 501-510.

Imlay, Robert, “Berkeley and action,” in Muehlmann (1995), 171-182.

Jacob, Alexander, “The Neoplatonic conception of nature in More, Cudworth and Berkeley,” in Gaukroger (1991).

Jacquette, Dale, “Berkeley’s continuity argument for the existence of God,” Journal of Religion 65 (1985), 1-14.

Jacquette, Dale, “Reconciling Berkeley’s microscopes in God’s infinite mind,” Religious Studies 29 (1993), 453-463.

Jaffro, Laurent, “Sensation et imagination. Berkeley et la ‘différence perçue’,” in Ressemblances et dissemblances dans l’empirisme britannique, dir. G. Brykman, université Paris 10-Nanterre, Le Temps philosophique 6 (1999), 71-91.

Jaffro, Laurent, “La paideia selon Berkeley et Shaftesbury. Un conflit dans la conception thérapeutique de la philosophie,” in La philosophie comme médecine de l’âme à l’âge classique, dir. G. Brykman, université Paris 10-Nanterre, Le Temps philosophique 9 (2003), 147-173.

Jaffro, Laurent, “Le cogito de Berkeley,” Archives de philosophie, 67 (2004), 85-111.

Jakapi, Roomet, Berkeley, mysteries, and meaning: a critique of the non-cognitivist interpretation, Dissertationes Philosophicae Universitatis Tartuensis, 2 (Tartu: Tartu University Press, 2002).

Jakapi, Roomet, “Emotive meaning and Christian mysteries in Berkeley’s Alciphron, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (2002), 401-411.

Jakapi, Roomet, “Faith, truth, revelation and meaning in Berkeley’s defence of the Christian religion (in Alciphron)”, The Modern Schoolman 80 (2002), 23-34.

Jakapi, Roomet, “Entry 720 of Berkeley’s Philosophical Commentaries and ‘non-cognitive’ propositions in Scripture,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 85 (2003), 86-90.

Jesseph, Douglas M., ed., George Berkeley, De Motu and The Analyst. A modern edition with introductions and commentary (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1992).

Jesseph, Douglas M., Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).

Jessop, T. E., “George Berkeley and the proofs of the existence of God,” Journal of Theological Studies 9 (1958), 197-198.

Jolley, N., “Berkeley and Malebranche on Causality and Volition,” in Cover (1990), 227-244.

Jones, Tom, Pope and Berkeley: the language of poetry and philosophy (Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).

Kabitoglou, E, Douka, “On the discrimination of Platonisms in eighteenth century England.” Philosophical Inquiry 15 (1993), 20-45.

Kasam, A., “Can Berkeley be called an imagist?,” Indian Philosophical Quarterly 6 (1989), 75-88.

Kassavine, Illia, “Berkeley revised: on the new metaphysics for social epistemology. 90 years after Materialism and Empiriocriticism,” Epistemologia 19 (1996), 157-174.

Kearney, John, “Thought, language and meaning in Berkeley’s philosophy,” The New Scholasticism 49 (1975), 4804-94.

Kearney, Richard, “Berkeley and the Irish mind,” Études irlandaises (1986), 7-25.

Kelly, Patrick, “Ireland and the critique of mercantilism in Berkeley’s Querist [Abstract],” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985), 14.

Kelly, Patrick, “Berkeley and money: Ireland and the critique of mercantilism in Berkeley’s Querist,Hermathena 139 (1985), 101-116.

Kelly, Patrick, “Berkeley and Ireland,” Études irlandaises (1986), 7-25.

Kelly, Patrick, “Berkeley’s servants,” Berkeley Newsletter 14 (1995/96), 13-14.

Keynes, Geoffrey, “Samuel Johnson and Bishop Berkeley,” The Book Collector (1981), 177-181.

Kijaczko, Stanislaw, Immaterializm: epistemologia I metafizyka: próba interpretacij filozofii George’a Berkeleya (Opole: Wydawn. Uniwersytetu Opolskiego, 2002).

Kingston, F. Temple, The metaphysics of George Berkeley, 1685-1753: Irish philosopher (Lewiston: Mellen, 1992).

Klein, Lawrence E., “Berkeley, Shaftesbury and the meaning of politeness,” Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture 16 (1986), 57-68.

Kline, David A., “Berkeley’s theory of common sense,” International Studies in Philosophy 19 (1987), 21-31.

Kline, David A., “Berkeley’s divine language argument,” in Berman (1993), 185-199.

Kohlenberg, Philip, “Bishop Berkeley on religion and the church,“ Harvard Theoogical Review 66 (1973), 219-236.

Kopper, Joachim, Das Unbezügliche als Offenbarsein: Besinnung auf das philosophische Denken (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004).

Kroustallis, Basileios, “Berkeley and the moon illusion”, History of Philosophy Quarterly 21(2004), 151-166.

Kulenkampff, Arend, George Berkeley (München: Beck, 1987).

Kulenkampff, Arend, Esse est percipi. Untersuchungen zur Philosophie George Berkeleys (Basel: Schwabe, 2001).

Kupfer, Joseph, “Universalization in Berkeley’s rule-utilitarianism,” Revue internationale de philosophie 28 (1974), 511-531.

Lambert, Richard, “Berkeley’s use of the relativity argument,” Idealistic Studies (1980), 107-121.

Lambert, Richard, “The literal intent of Berkeley’s Dialogues,” Philosophy and Literature 6 (1982).

Lamers, Robert, “Berkeley and Schopenhauer,” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch (1981), 120-143.

Leary, David E., “Berkeley’s social theory: context and development,” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977), 635-649.

Lebrun, G., “Berkeley ou le sceptique malgré lui,” Manuscrito 11 (1988), 33-48.

Leduc-Fayette, Denise. “Qu’est-ce que ‘parler aux yuex’? Berkeley et le ‘langage optique’,” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 4 (1997), 409-427.

Lee, R. N., “What Berkeley’s notions are,” Idealistic Studies 20 (1990), 19-41.

Lennon, T. M., “Berkeley and the ineffable.” Syntheses 75 (1988), 231-250.

Lennon, T. M., “George Berkeley and the act-object distinction,” Dialogue 40 (2001), 651-667.

Lavine, Michael, “How to make a mistake,” Philosophia 22 (1993), 29-37.

Levin, David Michael, ed., Sites of Vision (Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press, 1997).

Levine, Michael, “Berkeley’s theocentric mentalism: pantheism?,” Sophia (1987), 30-41.

Levine, Michael and Levi, Neil. “Robinson on Berkeley: ‘bad faith’ or naive idealism?,” Idealistic Studies 22 (1992), 163-178.

Levy, David M., “Bishop Berkeley exorcises the infinite: fuzzy consequences of strict finitism,” Hume Studies 18 (1992), 511-536.

Levy, David M., “ ‘Magic Buffalo’ and Berkeley’s ‘Theory of Vision’: learning in society,” Hume Studies 19 (1993), 223-226.

Leyvraz, Jean-Pierre, “La notion de Dieu chex Berkeley,” Revue de theologie et de philosophie (1980), 241-252.

Lievers, Menno, “The Molyneux problem,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 30 (1992), 399-416.

Llamas-Gómez, Clara Isabel, “Introduction to ‘Berkeley’s Crossroads’,” Berkeley Newsletter 14 (1995/96), 1-4.

Lloyd, Peter B., Consciousness and Berkeley’s metaphysics (London: Ursa, 1999).

Lloyd, Peter B., Paranormal phenomena and Berkeley’s metaphysics (London: Ursa, 1999).

Lord, S. K., “Berkeleian linguistics,” Linguistics 213 (1978), 5-28.

Louet, D., “La critique de l’absolutisme newtonien chez Leibniz et Berkeley,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 93 (1988), 447-468.

Lucash, Frank S., “The nature of mind,” Giornale di Metafisica 13 (1991), 89-107.

Luce, A. A., “Berkeley and the living thing,” Hermathena 123 (1977), 19-25.

Luce, J. V., “Yale College and the acquisition of Whitehall,” Berkeley Newsletter 15 (1997/98), 19-22.

Lutterfelds, Wilhelm, “Kant oder Berkeley? Zum aktuellen Streit um den korrecten Realismus,” Perspektiven der Philosophie 22 (1996), 305-340.

Lyons, William, “Dysart Castle: George Berkeley’s childhood home,” Berkeley Newsletter 12 (1991/92), 11-15.

Mahon, James Edwin, “Review of The Rhetoric of Berkeley’s Philosophy by Peter Walmsley,” Berkeley Newsletter 14 (1995/96), 15-17.

Maia Neto, José R., “Academic skepticism in early modern philosophy,” Journal of the History of Ideas 58 (1997), 199-220.

Malherbe, Michel, “Husserl critique de Berkeley,” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986), 355-366.

Malherbe, Michel, “La critique husserlienne des idées abstraites selon Berkeley,” History of European Ideas 7 (1986), 623-632.

Mall, Ram Adhar, Der operative Begriff des Geistes: Locke, Berkeley, Hume (Freiburg, Breisgau: Alber, 1984).

Mancino, Michele, “Il Mezzogiorno nei diari (1717) del ‘Viaggio in Italia’ di George Berkeley,” in Atti delle giornate di studio: Il turismo culturale in Campania (Napoli, Quaderni dell’Università degli studi “Federico II”, 2004), 271-304.

Mathauser, Zdenek, “The theory of reflection in aesthetics and the heritage of George Berkeley” (in Czechoslovakian), Estetika 11 (1974), 30-52.

Mattey, G. J., “Kant’s conception of Berkeley’s idealism,” Kantstudien 74 (1983), 161-175.

McCracken, Charles J., “What does Berkeley’s God see in the quad?,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 61 (1979), 280-292.

McCracken, Charles J., Malebranche and British Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983).

McCracken, Charles J., “Berkeley’s conception of idea [Abstract],” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985), 14-16.

McCracken, Charles, “Berkeley’s notion of spirit,” History of European Ideas 7 (1986), 597-602.

McCracken, Charles J., "Stages on a Cartesian Road to Immaterialism," Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (1986), 19-40.

McCracken, Charles J., “Berkeley’s Cartesian concept of mind: the return through Malebranche and Locke to Descartes,” Monist 71 (1988), 596-611. 

McCracken, Charles J., “Berkeley on the relation of ideas to the mind,” in Cummins and Zoeller (1992), 187-200.

McCracken, Charles J., “Godless immaterialism: on Atherton’s Berkeley,” in Muehlmann (1995), 249-260.

McCracken, Charles J., "Demons that deceive, gods that perceive, and the limits of skepticism," in Brykman (1997), 73-89.

McCracken, Charles J., “Knowledge of the existence of bodies,” in Garber (1998), 624-648.

McCracken, Charles and Tipton, Ian, eds., Berkeley’s Principles and Dialogues: background source materials (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).

McCracken, Charles J., "George Berkeley," in Companion to Early Modern Philosophy, ed. Steven Nadler (Oxford: Blackwell, 2002), 437-55.

McGowan, William, “The dream of Ezra Stiles: Bis