|
Berkeley Bibliography
(1979-2009)
Abad, Juan Vázques. “Observaciones sobre la noción de causa en el
opusculo sobre el movimiento de Berkeley.”
Analisis Filosofico
6 (1986): 35-44.
Abelove, H. “George Berkeley’s Attitude to John Wesley: the Evidence of
a Lost Letter.” Harvard Theological Review 70 (1977): 175-76.
Ablondi, Fred. “Berkeley, Archetypes, and Errors.” Southern Journal
of Philosophy 43 (2005): 493-504.
Ackel, Helen. Über den Prozess der menschlichen Erkenntnis bei John
Locke und George Berkeley. München und Ravensburg: Grin (2008).
Adamczykowa, Izabella. “The Role of the Subject in the Cognitive Process
after George Berkeley: Passive for Active Subject?”
Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie Sklodowska, Sectio 1 Philosophia-Sociologia
6 (1981): 43-57.
Agassi, Joseph.
“The Future of Berkeley’s Instrumentalism.” International Studies in
Philosophy 7 (1975), 167-78.
Airaksinen, Timo. “Berkeley and the Justification of Beliefs
[Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985), 9.
_____. “Berkeley and the Justification of Beliefs.” Philosophy and
Phenomenological Research 48 (1987), 235-56.
_____. “The Chain and the Animal: Idealism in Berkeley’s Siris.”
In Gersh and Moran (2006), 224-43.
_____. “The Path of Fire: The Meaning and Interpretation of Berkeley’s
Siris.”
In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 261-81.
Alejandra Manzo, Silvia. “Eter, espirito animal e causalidade no
Siris de George Berkeley: uma visao imaterialista da analogia entre
macrocosmo e microcosmo.”
Scientiae Studia
2 (2004): 179-205.
Alfonso, Louis, E. “The Notes on the Government and Population of the
Kingdom of Naples and Berkeley’s Probable Route to Sicily.”
Berkeley Newsletter 11 (1989/90): 20-27.
Allaire, Edwin B. “Berkeley’s Idealism: Yet Another Visit.” In Muehlmann
(1995), 23-38.
Ameeri, Javed Iqbal. “Factors and Main Trends in Early British
Empiricism. An Overview.” Journal of European Studies 8 (1992):
78-93.
Ameriks, Karl. “Idealism from Kant to Berkeley.” In Gersh and Moran
(2006), 244-68.
Anapolitanos, D. A. “The Continuous and the Discrete: Leibniz versus
Berkeley and Locke.” Philosophical Inquiry 13 (1991): 1-24.
Ariotti, Piero. “Benedetto Castelli and George Berkeley as Anticipators
of Recent Findings on the Moon Illusion.” Journal of the History of
the Behavioral Sciences 9 (1973): 328-32.
Armogathe, Jean-Robert. “Proofs of the Existence of God.” In Garber
(1998), 305-30.
Armstrong, D. M. “The Heart of Berkeley’s Metaphysics: a Reply to Ernest
Sosa.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 162-64.
Arsi’c, Branka. The Passive Eye: Gaze and Subjectivity in
Berkeley (via Beckett). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press,
2003.
Asfour, Amal and Williamson, Paul. “Splendid Impositions: Gainsborough,
Berkeley, Hume.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 31 (1998): 403-32.
Asher, W. O. “Berkeley on Absolute Motion.” History of Philosophy
Quarterly 4 (1987): 447-66.
Atherton, Margaret. “The Coherence of Berkeley’s Theory of Mind.”
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 43 (1983): 389-400.
_____. Berkeley’s Revolution in Vision. Ithaca: Cornell
University Press, 1990.
_____. “Corpuscles, Mechanism, and Essentialism in Berkeley and Locke.”
Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1991): 47-67.
_____. “Berkeley without God.” In Muehlmann (1995), 231-48.
_____. “Lady Mary Shepherd’s Case against George Berkeley.” British
Journal for the History of Philosophy 4 (1996): 347-66.
_____. “How to write the History of Vision: Understanding the
Relationship between Berkeley and Descartes.” In Levin (1997), 139-66.
_____, ed. The Empiricists: Critical Essays on Locke, Berkeley, and
Hume.
Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999.
_____. “Apprendre à voir: les enseignements de la Défense de la
Théorie de la vision.” In Berlioz (2003), 135-57.
_____. “Comment Berkeley parvient à maintenir que la neige est blanche.”
In Charles (2004), 127-44.
_____. “Berkeley’s Theory of Vision and Its Reception.” In Winkler
(2005), 94-124.
_____. “The Objects of Immediate Perception.” In Daniel, New
Interpretations (2007), 107-19.
Ayers, Michael R. “Berkeley’s Immaterialism and Kant’s Transcendental
Idealism.” Idealism Past and Present, edited by Godfrey Vesey.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982, 51-69.
_____. “Berkeley and the Meaning of Existence.” History of European
Ideas 7 (1986): 567-74.
_____. “Theories of Knowledge and Belief.” In Garber (1998), 1003-61.
_____. “Ideas and Objective Being.” In Garber (1998), 1062-1107.
_____. “Was Berkeley an Empiricist or a Rationalist?” In Winkler (2005),
34-62.
_____. “Berkeley, Ideas, and Idealism.” In Daniel, Reexamining
Berkeley (2007), 11-28.
Ayers, Michael and Garber, Daniel. “Theories of Knowledge and Belief.”
In Garber (1998), 1003-1061.
Baber, H. E. “Berkeley and the Tattletale Paradox.” Idealistic
Studies 19 (1989): 79-82.
Baier, Annette. “The Intentionality of Intentions.” Review of
Metaphysics 30 (1977): 389-414.
Baladi, Naguib.
“Plotin et l’immatérialisme de Berkeley: témoignage de la Siris.”
In Plotino e il neoplatonismo in Oriente e in Occidente, ed.
Enrico Cerulli. Roma: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, 1974, 597-604.
Barber, Kenneth F. and Gracia, Jorge J. E., eds.
Individuation and Identity in Early Modern Philosophy.
Albany: SUNY Press, 1994.
Bardout, Jean-Christophe. “Berkeley
et les métaphysiques de son temps.”
Journal of the History of Philosophy
46 (2008): 119-139.
Barnouw, Jeffrey. “The Two Motives Behind Berkeley’s Expressly
Unmotivated Signs: Sure Perception and Personal Providence.” In Daniel,
New Interpretations (2007), 145-77.
Baum, Robert J. “The Instrumentalist and Formalist Elements of
Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics.” Studies in History and
Philosophy of Science 3 (1972): 119-34.
Baxter, Donald. Berkeley, Perception and Identity.” Philosophy and
Phenomenological Research 51 (1991): 85-98.
_____. “Abstraction, Inseparability and Identity.” Philosophy and
Phenomenological Research 57 (1997): 307-30.
Beal, M. W. “Berkeley’s Deletions.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy
6 (1976): 455-78.
Belfrage, Bertil. “A New Dating of Berkeley’s Draft Introduction.”
Berkeley Newsletter 1 (1977): 10-11.
_____. “Notes
by Berkeley on Moral Philosophy.”
Berkeley Newsletter
2 (1978): 4-7.
_____.
“Review of Berkeley, Philosophical Commentaries. Edited by George
Thomas.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 10.
_____.
“Review of George Pitcher, Berkeley.” Berkeley Newsletter
2 (1978): 10.
_____.
“A Summary of Berkeley’s Metaphysics in a Hitherto Unpublished
Berkeleian Manuscript.” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 1-4.
_____.
“Review of Berkeley, Philosophisches Tagebuch. Translated by
Wolfgang Breidert.” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 17-19.
_____.
“Review of Edwin S. Gaustad, George Berkeley in America.”
Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 16-17.
_____.
“Corrigenda to ‘A Summary of Berkeley’s Metaphysics’.” Berkeley
Newsletter 4 (1980): 19.
_____. “Review of Berkeley, Drei Dialogen zwischen Hulas und
Philonous.
Introduced by Wolfgang Breidert.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980):
17.
_____.
“The Newport Extract of Berkeley’s Passive Obedience.”
Berkeley Newsletter 5 (1981): 6-9.
_____.
“An Obscure Supplement to Volume One of Berkeley’s Works.”
Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 17-21.
_____.
“Dating Berkeley’s Notebook B.” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984):
7-13.
_____.
“Facts Concerning Berkeley’s Notebooks.” Berkeley Newsletter 7
(1984): 17-22.
_____.
“Strata in Berkeley’s Notebooks [Abstract].” Berkeley
Newsletter 8 (1985): 10-11.
_____.
“The Clash on Semantics in Berkeley’s Notebook A.” Hermathena 139
(1985): 117-26.
_____.
“The Order and Dating of Berkeley’s Notebooks.” Revue internationale
de philosophie 154 (1985): 196-214.
_____.
“Berkeley’s Theory of Emotive Meaning (1708).” History of European
Ideas 7 (1986): 643-49.
_____.
“Development of Berkeley’s Early Theory of Meaning.”
Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger
(1986): 319-30.
_____.
“Une nouvelle édition de Berkeley.” Revue philosophique de la France
et de l’étranger (1986): 367-72.
_____,
ed., George Berkeley’s Manuscript Introduction. An editio diplomatica
transcribed and edited with introduction and commentary.
Oxford: Doxa, 1987.
_____.
“A Response to M. A. Stewart’s ‘Berkeley’s Introduction Draft’.”
Berkeley Newsletter 12 (1991/92): 1-10.
_____.
“The Constructivism of Berkeley’s New Theory of Vision.” In Cummins and
Zoeller (1992): 167-86.
_____.
“Berkeley.” In The Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century British
Philosophers, ed. J. W. Yolton, J. V. Price, and J. Stephens.
Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1999, 84-90.
_____.
“Vers une nouvelle interprétation de la Théorie de la vision de
Berkeley.”
In Berlioz (2003), 159-211.
_____.
“The Scientific Background of George Berkeley’s Idealism.” In Gersh and
Moran (2006), 202-23.
_____. “Berkeley’s Four Concepts of the Soul (1707-1709).” In Daniel,
Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 172-87.
_____.
“The Theological Positivism of George Berkeley (1707-1708).” In Lemetti
and Piirimäe (2007), 37-52.
Bellemare, Pierre and Raynor, David. “Berkeley’s Letters to le Clerc
(1711).” Hermathena 146 (1989): 7-23.
Benítez, Laura. “El
espíritu como principio activo en Berkeley.”
Analisis
Filosofico 6 (1986): 23-34.
Bennett, Jonathan. “On Translating Locke, Berkeley and Hume into
English.” Teaching Philosophy 17 (1994): 261-69.
_____. Learning from Six Philosophers: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz,
Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.
Benschop, Hans Peter. Berkeley on Method and Metaphysics. Ph. D.
diss., University of Leiden, 1992.
_____. “Berkeley, Lee and Abstract Ideas.” British Journal for the
History of Philosophy 5 (1997): 55-66.
Benson, Charles. “Prior’s Authentic Narrative.”
Berkeley Newsletter
3 (1979): 14-15.
Ben-Zeev, A. “Reexamining Berkeley’s Notion of Suggestion.” Conceptus
23 (1989): 21-30.
Berlioz, Dominique. “G. Berkeley: ‘Of Infinites’.”
Revue philosophique
(1982): 45-57.
_____. “ ‘To stand for’ et ‘to represent’ dans l’Introduction manuscrite
de Berkeley.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger
(1986): 331-38.
_____. Berkeley. Un nominalisme réaliste (Paris: J. Vrin, 2000).
_____, ed. Berkeley: Langage de la perception et art de voir. Débats
philosophiques. Paris: PUF, 2003.
_____. “Vision et géométrie chez Berkeley.” in Charles (2004), 145-61.
_____. and Nef, Frederic. “Berkeley ou l’idée contre la représentation.”
In Ong-Van-Cung (2006), 163-77.
Berman, David. “Berkeley’s Letter to H. Clarke.” Berkeley Newsletter
1 (1977): 9.
_____. “Mrs. Berkeley’s Annotations in her Interleaved Copies of An
Account of the Life of Berkeley (1776).” Hermathena (1977):
15-28.
_____. “A New Berkeley Portrait.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978):
8-9.
_____. “A Note on Berkeley and his Catholic Countrymen.” Long Room
16-17 (1978): 26-28.
_____. “Berkeley’s Letter to Lord Orrey.” Berkeley Newsletter 3
(1979): 12-13.
_____. “Berkeley’s Departure for America: a New Letter.” Berkeley
Newsletter 4 (1980): 14.
_____. “Berkeley’s Philosophical Reception after America.”
Archiv fûr Geschichte der Philosophie
62 (1980): 311-20.
_____. “Bishop Berkeley and the Fountains of Living Waters.”
Hermathena 128 (1980): 21-31.
_____. “Cognitive Theology and Emotive Mysteries in Berkeley’s
Alciphron.” Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy (1981):
219-29.
_____. “Did Berkeley Write Guardian 130?.” Berkeley Newsletter
5 (1981): 10-13.
_____ and Berman, Jill. “The Fountains Portraits of Bishop Berkeley.”
Apollo (1982): 76-79.
_____. “Beckett and Berkeley.” Irish University Review (1984):
42-45.
_____. “Review of The Guardian, edited by John Calhoun Stephens.”
Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 23-26.
_____. “Berkeley and the Moon Illusion.” Revue internationale de
philosophie 154 (1985): 215-22.
_____. “George Berkeley: Pictures by Goldsmith, Yeats and Luce.”
Hermathena 139 (1985): 9-23.
_____. “Berkeley’s Semantic Revolution: 19 November 1707 — 11 January
1708.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 603-8.
_____. “Berkeley’s Siris and the ‘Whiskey Patriots’.”
Eighteenth-Century Ireland, 1 (1986): 200-203.
_____. “The Jacobitism of Berkeley’s Passive Obedience.”
Journal of the History of Ideas 47 (1986): 309-19.
_____, ed. George Berkeley. Eighteenth-Century Responses. New
York-London: Garland, 1989, 2 vols. In Pitcher (1988-1989).
_____, ed. George Berkeley, Alciphron, or the Minute Philosopher: in
Focus. London; New York: Routledge, 1993.
_____. George Berkeley: Idealism and the Man. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
_____. Berkeley and Irish Philosophy. London and New York:
Continuum, 2005.
_____. “Berkeley’s Life and Works.” In Winkler (2005), 13-33.
Bermudez, Jose Luis. “The Adequacy of Simple Ideas in Locke . A
Rehabilitation of Berkeley’s Criticisms.” Locke Newsletter 23:
347-54.
Bernabei, Andrea. “Il ‘cieco di Molyneux’: un problema di percezione
visiva nella Francia illuminista.” Rivista critica di storia della
filosofia 30 (1975): 132-66.
Bertini, Daniele, ed. George Berkeley, Saggio su una nuova teoria
della visione-Trattato sui principi della conoscenza umana. Milano:
R.C.S., 2004;
_____, ed. George Berkeley, Alcifrone. Milano: R.C.S., 2005;
_____. “Berkeley”, in Enciclopedia filosofica edited by V.
Melchiorre. Milano: Rizzoli, 2006, vol. II, 1205-13.
_____. “Shaftesbury, Mandeville, Berkeley e il mito del contratto
sociale”. Fenomenologia e Società 29 (2006): 128-45.
_____. “Hume e l'immaterialismo”. Aquinas 49, (2006): 621-35.
_____. Sentire Dio. L’immaterialismo come via per
un’interpretazione mistica dell’esperienza. Assisi: Cittadella
Editrice, 2007.
_____. “Plotinus, Leibniz, and Berkeley on Determinism.” In Late
Antique Epistemology: Other Ways to Truth, ed. Panayiota
Vassilopoulou and Stephen R. L. Clarke. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan,
2009.
Bettcher, Talia Mae. “Berkeley on Self-Consciousness”. In Daniel, New
Interpretations 2007, 179-202.
_____. Berkeley’s Philosophy of Spirit: Consciousness, Ontology and
the Elusive Subject. London: Continuum Publishing, 2007.
_____.
Berkeley : a guide for the perplexed.
London, New York : Continuum, 2008.
_____. “Berkeley and Hume on Self and Self-Consciousness.” In Topics
in Early Modern Philosophy of Mind, edited by Jon Miller.
Netherlands: Springer (2009),
193-222.
Beyhl, Helmut. Bischof Berkeley, der Mann, der den gesunden
Menschenverstand tanzen lässt: das ‘Problem’ des Beweises der Realität
der Außenwelt. Ph. D. Diss. University of Berlin, 1990.
Beyssade, Jean-Marie. “L’expérience du rêve et l’extétiorité (de
Descartes à Berkeley).” Revue philosophique de la France et de
l’étranger 111 (1986): 355-66.
_____. “Philosophie et apologétique chez Berkeley.” Revue
philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986): 377-84.
Bird, Graham, ed.
A Companion to Kant.
Blackwell-Publishing :
Malden MA, 2006.
Blackith, Robert. “A Berkeleian Time-Warp.” Berkeley Newsletter
10 (1987/88): 1-4.
Blake, J. B. “Addenda to Keynes: a Bibliography of Berkeley.”
Bibliographical Society of America Papers 73 (1979): 337-40.
Blay, Michel. “Deux moments de la critique du calcul infinitésimal :
Michel Rolle et George Berkeley”. Revue d’Histoire des sciences
39, 3 (1983): 223-53.
Bolton, Martha Brandt. “Berkeley and Mental Representation: Why Not a
Lockean Theory of Ideas?”. In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007),
77-106.
Bonk, Sigmund. Immaterialismus: Darstellung und Verteidigung von
George Berkeleys Gottesbeweis und immaterialistischem Weltbild.
München, 1990.
_____. “George Berkeleys Gottesbeweis.” Neue Zeitschrift für
systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 36 (1994): 268-83.
_____. “George Berkeleys Nachweis einer gottlichen Vorsehung.” Neue
Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 39
(1997): 176-90.
_____. “George Berkeley’s Theory of Time: ‘A-Total-Disaster’.” Studia
Leibnitiana 29 (1997): 198-210.
_____. “We see God”: George Berkeley’s Philosophical Theology.
Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1997.
_____. Abschied von der Anima mundi: die britische Philosophie im
Vorfeld der industriellen Revolution. Freiburg, Breisgau: Alber,
1999.
Borges, Jorge Luis. “Berkeley’s Crossroads.” Berkeley Newsletter
14 (1995/96): 5-12.
Bouveresse-Quilliot Renée, ed. Cahiers
d’histoire de la philosophie: Berkeley.
Bourgogne: Centre Gaston Bachelard, 2000.
Božovič,
Miran. Der grosse Andere: Gotteskonzepte in der Philosophie der
Neuzeit. Wien: Turia und Kant, 1993.
Božovič,
Miran; Klun, Branko; and Mervič,
Stojan.
Vprašanje Boga pri Berkeleyju : diplomska naloga.
Ljubljana: [S. Mervič],
2008.
Bracken, Harry M. “Berkeley: Irish Cartesian.” Philosophical Studies
24 (1976): 39-51.
_____. “Bayle, Berkeley, and Hume.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 11
(1977): 227-45.
_____. “Realism and Greek Philosophy: What Berkeley Saw and Burnyeat
Missed [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 10.
_____. “Realism and Greek Philosophy: What Berkeley Saw and Burnyeat
Missed.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 63-80.
_____. “On Some Points in Bayle, Berkeley, and Hume.” History of
Philosophy Quarterly 4 (1987): 435-46.
_____. “The
Other Bishop Berkeley: An Exercise in Reenchantment (review).”
Journal of the History of Philosophy, 46 (2008): 177.
Bradatan, Costica. “Berkeley and Liber Mundi.” Minerva. An Internet
Journal of Philosophy 3 (1999), University of Limerick, Ireland.
_____. “Waiting for the eschaton: Berkeley’s ‘Bermuda Scheme’
Between Earthly Paradise and Educational Utopia”, Utopian Studies
14 (2003): 36-50.
_____. “Philosophy as Palimpsest. In Search for an Immemorial Wisdom.”
Existentia. An International Journal of Philosophy 14 (2004):
337-44.
_____. “'God is Dreaming You': Narrative as Imitatio Dei in Miguel de
Unamuno.” Janus Head - A Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in
Continental Philosophy, Literature, Phenomenological Psychology and the
Arts 7 (2004): 453-46.
_____. “Review: Branka Arsic, The Passive Eye: Gaze and Subjectivity
in Berkeley (via Beckett)”. Philosophy 24 (2004): 237-39.
_____. “'One is All, and All is One.' The Great Chain of Being in
Berkeley's Siris" in O'Gorman and Donald (2005), 63-82.
_____. “George Berkeley's 'Universal Language of Nature'" in Klaas van
Berkel and Vanderjagt (2005), 71-84.
_____. Introduction to George Berkeley, Treatise Concerning the
Principles of Human Knowledge. New York: Barnes & Noble Books, 2006.
_____. “Rhetoric of Faith and Patterns of Persuasion in Berkeley's
'Alciphron'”, The Heythrop Journal 47 (2006): 544-61.
______. The Other Bishop Berkeley. An Exercise in Re-enchantment.
New York: Fordham University Press, 2006.
Bradshaw, D. E. “Berkeley and Hume on Abstraction and Generalization.”
History of Philosophy Quarterly 5 (1988): 11-22.
Brandt, Reinhard. “Historical Observations on the Genesis of the
Three-dimensional Optical Picture.”
Ratio
17 (1975): 176-90.
Braund, Michael J.
From inference to affordance: the problem of visual depth-perception in
the optical writings of Descartes, Berkeley, and Gibson.
St. Catharines, Ont.: Brock University, Dept. of Philosophy (2008).
Brayton, Alice. George Berkeley in Apulia. Kessinger Publisher
(2007).
Breidert, Wolfgang. “Corrigendum.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978):
13.
_____. “Einleitung” to George Berkeley, Drei Dialoge. Hamburg:
Felix Meiner Verlag, 1980.
_____. “Die Rezeption Berkeleys in Deutschland im 18 Jahrhundert.”
Revue internationale de philosophie
154 (1985): 223-41.
_____. “George Berkeley (1685-1753)”, Fridericana Zeitschrift der
Universität Karlsruhe 36 (1985): 3-13.
_____. “On Some Marginal Signs in the Philosophical Commentaries.”
Berkeley Newsletter
8 (1985): 7-8.
_____. “With
the Infinite God Against the Mathematics of Infinity [Abstract].”
Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 11-12.
_____. “Berkeley’s De Ludo Algebraico and Notebook B.”
Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 12-14.
_____. “Berkeley’s Kritik an der Infinitesimalrechnung.” Studia
Leibnitiana 14 (1986): 185-91.
_____. “On the Early Reception of Berkeley in Germany.” In Sosa (1987),
231-41.
_____, ed., George Berkeley, Versuch über eine Theorie des Sehens und
Die Theorie des Sehens .. verteidigt und erklär. Hamburg: Felix
Meiner, 1987.
_____. “Review: Essays on Berkeley, edited by John Foster and
Howard Robinson.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 69
(1987): 315-21.
_____. “Schopenhauer und Berkeley.” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch 69
(1988): 373-85.
_____. George Berkeley 1685-1753. Basel: Birkhauser, 1989.
_____. “Berkeley, George." In Lexikon für Theologie und Kirche,
vol. 2, 1994, col. 260.
_____, Einleitung in George Berkeley, Alciphron oder der Kleine
Philosoph. Translated by Luise und Friedrich Raab; edited by
Wolfgang Breidert. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1996.
_____. “Berkeley's Sources in Mathematics.” In Brykman (1997), 49-58.
_____. “George Berkeley. Philosophie des Immaterialismus.” In
Philosophen des 18. Jahrhunderts, edited by Kreimendahl and Lothar.
Darmstadt, 2000, 68-86.
_____. “Berkeley's Defence of Infinite God in the Contrast to the
Infinite in Mathematics.” In Koetsier and Bergmans (2005), 499-508.
_____. “Berkeley Poeticized”. In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley
(2007), 214-29.
Breuninger, Scott Christopher. Morals, the Market, and History:
George Berkeley and Social Virtue in Early Eighteenth-Century Thought.
Ph. D. diss., University of Wisconsin, 2002.
_____. “Rationality
and Revolution: Rereading Berkeley's Sermons on Passive Obedience.”
New Hibernia Review
12 (2008): 63-86.
Brolley, Kevin G. “Review of Berkeley by J. O. Urmson.”
Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 22-23.
Brook, Richard. “Berkeley, Causality and Signification.”
International Studies in Philosophy 27 (1995): 15-31.
_____. “Berkeley's Theory of Vision, Transparency and Signification.”
British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11(2003): 661-69.
_____. “Berkeley, Bundles, and Immediate Perception.” Dialogue
44 (2005): 493-504.
Brown, Stuart. “Leibniz on Berkeley [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter
8 (1985): 13-14.
_____. “Platonic Idealism in Modern Philosophy from Malebranche to
Berkeley.” in Cambridge Platonists in Philosophical Context.
Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1997, 197-214.
Brykman, Geneviève. “Berkeley: sa lecture de Malebranche à travers le
Dictionaire de Bayle.” Revue internationale de philosophie 29
(1975): 496-514.
_____. “Berkeley, lecteur et critique de Spinoza.” Recherches sur le
XVIIème Siècle 2 (1978): 173-92.
_____. “Le cartésianisme dans le De Motu.”
Revue internationale de philosophie
3 (1979): 553-69.
_____. “The Close Inspection of Words and Ideas in Berkeley’s Writings.”
Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 9-10.
_____.
“Abstracts of ‘Le Cartesianisme dans le De Motu’ and ‘Pouvoir
d’abstraire et notions abstraites chez Berkeley.” Berkeley Newsletter
4 (1980): 15.
_____. “Pouvoir d’abstraire et notions abstraites chez Berkeley.”
Recherches sur le XVIIème siècle 4 (1980): 157-66.
_____. “Berkeley à Newport: 1729-1779.” Recherches sur le XVIIème
Siècle 4 (1980): 167-69.
_____. “Berkeley et l’interieur absolu des choses.”
Revue philosophique
(1980): 421-32.
_____. “Philosophy and Apologetics in Berkeley.” Berkeley Newsletter
6 (1982/83): 12-16.
_____.
“Le modèle visuel de la connaissance chez Berkeley.” Revue
philosophique (1983): 427-41.
_____. Berkeley: philosophie et apologétique. Lille: Atelier
National de reproduction des thèses; Paris: Vrin, 1984, 2 vols.
_____. “Pleasure and Pain versus Ideas in Berkeley [Abstract].”
Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 12-13.
_____. “Pleasure and Pain versus Ideas in Berkeley.” Hermathena
139 (1985): 127-37.
_____.
“Principe de ressemblance et hétérogénéité des idées chez Berkeley.”
Revue internationale de philosophie 154 (1985): 242-51.
_____. “L’esprit et les idées visuelles dans la Nouvelle théorie de la
vision.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 585-91.
_____. “Tricentenaire ‘Berkeley’: (1685-1985).” Revue de synthèse
109 (1988): 148-50.
_____. “Berkeley et l’analogie des noms:”, Les Etudes philosophiques
3-4 (1989): 445-54.
_____. “Sensibles communs et sens commun chez Locke et Berkeley.”
Revue de métaphysique et de morale (1991): 515-29.
_____.
“Review: George Berkeley, De Motu, translated into Italian with
an introduction by Mariapaola Fimiani.” Berkeley Newsletter 12
(1991/92): 17.
_____. Berkeley et le voile des mots. Paris: Vrin, 1993.
_____. “Vision, connaissance et ontologie chez Berkeley.” In Monti
(1995), 121-37.
_____, ed., Berkeley et le cartésianisme. Le Temps philosophique
2. Nanterre: Université Paris X-Nanterre, 1997.
_____., ed. Rassemblances et dissemblances dans l’empirisme
britannique. Le Temps philosophique 6. Nanterre: Département de
Philosophie, Université Paris X-Nanterre, 1999.
_____. “Plaisir/douleur et passivité des idées dans l’immaterialisme de
Berkeley. ” In Bouveresse-Quilliot (2000), 15-35.
_____. “L’hétérogénéité des idées sensibles et le ‘langage de la Nature’
chez Locke et Berkeley.”
In Berlioz (2003), 17-46.
_____. “On Human Liberty in Berkeley’s Alciphron VII.” In Daniel,
New Interpretations (2007), 231-46.
Bunnin, N. F. The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy. Oxford:
Blackwell, 1996.
Burnyeat, M. F. “Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and
Berkeley Missed.” Idealism Past and Present (1982): 19-50.
Bustamante, Rodrigo. “La critica de Berkeley al infinito categorico.”
Contrafuerte
(1985): 28-34.
Byrne, P. A. “Berkeley, Scientific Realism and Creation.” Religious
Studies 20 (1984): 453-64.
Caffentzis, George Constantine, Über die Ursachen von “The Querist”:
Vademecum zu einem irischen Klassiker der politischen Ökonomie.
Düsseldorf: Verl. Wirtschaft und Finanzen, 1999.
_____. Exciting the Industry of Mankind: George Berkeley’s Philosophy
of Money. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000.
_____. “Medical Metaphors and Monetary Strategies in the Political
Economy of Locke and Berkeley.” History of Political Economy 35
(2003: supplement): 204-33.
_____. “Algebraic Money: Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics and
Money.” Berkeley Studies 18 (2007): 3-23.
Campagnola, Francesco. “George Berkeley e la teoria dell'analogia
divina.”
Nouvelles-de-la-Republique-des-lettres
2 (2006): 25-76.
Camporesi, Cristiano. “Aporie berkeleyane.”
Rivista di filosofia
73 (1982): 471-73.
Cantor, Geoffrey N. “Berkeley, Reid and the Mathematization of
Mid-Eighteenth-Century Optics.” Journal of the History of Ideas
38 (1977): 429-48.
_____. “Two Letters Relating to Berkeley’s Social Circle.” Berkeley
Newsletter 4 (1980): 1-3.
_____. “Berkeley’s The Analyst Revisited.” Isis 75 (1984):
668-83.
Carlin, Laurence. “Selecting a Phenomenalism: Leibniz, Berkeley and the
Science of Happiness.” Journal of the History of Ideas 68 (2007):
57-78.
_____.
The Empiricists: A Guide for the Perplexed.
New York: Continuum, 2009.
Casini, Paolo. “Newton’s Principia and the Philosophers of the
Enlightenment.” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London
42 (1988): 35-52.
Cates, Lynn D. “Berkeley on the Work of the Six Days.” Faith and
Philosophy 14 (1997): 82-86.
Chaney, Edward. The Evolution of the Grand Tour since the
Renaissance. London: Franck Cass, 1998.
Charles, Sébastien. “L’abbé Raynal, author of an unnoticed review of
Berkeley’s Dialogues.” Berkeley Newsletter 15 (1997/98):
14-18.
_____. “The Siris in the Age of Enlightenment: Panacea or
Imposture?.” Hermathena 168 (2000): 55-69.
_____. “Hume and Berkeley in the Prussian Academy: Louis Frederic
Ancillon’s ‘Dialogue between Berkeley and Hume’ of 1796.”, Hume
Studies 27 (2001): 85-97.
_____. “Ocasionalismo y modernidad: Berkeley, lector critico de
Malebranche.” Praxis Filosofica 13 (2001): 27-42.
_____. “Existence et temporalité au Siècle des Lumières: Turgot lecteur
de Maupertuis et Berkeley.” Lumen 21 (2002): 45-59.
_____ Berkeley au siècle des lumières: immatérialisme et scepticisme
au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: J. Vrin, 2003.
_____. “Berkeley occasionaliste malgré lui? De la causalité et de la
volonté chez Malebranche et Berkeley.” In Charles (2004), 73-88.
_____, ed., Science et épistémologie selon Berkeley.
Saint-Nicolas, Québec: Les Presses l’Université Laval, 2004.
_____. “Berkeley and the Lumières: Misconception and
Reconstruction.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 283-309.
_____. “Berkeley polémiste: des Sérmons sur l’obéissance passive
(1712) aux Maximes sur le patriotisme (1750)” The European
Legacy 13 (2008): 413-24.
Cicekdagi, Caner. Esse Est Percipi in Berkeley's Book Three Dialogues
between Hylas and Philonous. Kaygi: Uludag Universitesi Felsefe
Dergisi (Uludag University Journal of Philosophy). 10 (2008): 115-26.
Chinn, Ewing Y. “The anti-abstractionism of Dignana and Berkeley.”
Philosophy East and West
44 (1994): 55-77.
Chiurazzi, G. “Il problema della
mediazione nella filosofia di George Berkeley.”
Filosofia
49 (1998): 53-75.
Clark, Stephen R. L., Money, Obedience, and Affection: Essays on
Berkeley’s Moral and Political Thought. New York: Garland, 1989.
_____. “Berkeley on Religion.” In Winkler (2005), 369-404.
Clarke, Desmond M.
George Berkeley: Philosophical Writings.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2008).
Clasen, Uwe. Die Sehtheorien von René Descartes und George Berkeley
im Spiegel der Geschichte der physiologischen Optik . Aachen: Tecn.
Hochsch. Diss., 1997.
Collingridge, D. G. “Berkeley on Space, Sight and Touch.” Philosophy
53 (1978): 102-5.
Conroy, Graham P. “George Berkeley and the Jacobite Heresy: Some
Comments on Irish Augustan Politics.” Albion 3 (1971): 82.
Cope, Kevin L. “Moral Travel and the Pursuit of Nothing: Vathek and
Siris as Philosophical Monologue.” Studies in Eighteenth-Century
Culture 18 (1988): 167-86.
Cover, J. A. Central Themes in Early Modern Philosophy.
Indianapolis: Hacket, 1990.
Coxito, Amandio Augusto. “Un texto de Luis A. Vernei contra o
imaterialismo de Berkeley.” Revista Filosofia de Coimbra 6
(1997): 101-17.
Crain, Steven D. “Must a Classical Theist Be an Immaterialist?.”
Religious Studies 33 (1997): 81-92.
Creery, Walter E., ed., George Berkeley: Critical Assessments.
London; New York: Routledge, 1991, 3 vols.
Crombie, Alistair C. George Berkeley Bicentenary. New York:
Garland, 1988.
Cross, C. B. “Berkeley on Other Minds.”
Auslegung
6 (1978): 45-50.
Cummins, Phillip and Zoeller, Guenter, eds. Minds, Ideas, and
Objects: Essays on the Theory of Representation in Modern Philosophy.
Atascadero, California: Ridgeview Publishing Company, 1992.
_____.
“Berkeley’s Ideas of Sense.” Nous 9 (1975): 55-72.
_____. “Berkeley’s Unstable Ontology.” Modern Schoolman 67
(1989): 15-32.
_____. “Sections Nine and Ten of Berkeley’s Principles.”
Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 1-5.
_____. “Berkeley on Minds and Agency.” In Winkler (2005), 190-229.
_____.”Perceiving and Berkeley’s Theory of Substance.” In Daniel,
Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 121-52.
_____.
Berkeley's Likeness Principle.
The Johns Hopkins University Press (2008).
Danaher, James P. “Is Berkeley’s World a Divine Language?.” Modern
Theology 18 (2002): 361-73.
Dancy, Jonathan. Berkeley: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell,
1987.
_____, ed., George Berkeley, A Treatise Concerning the Principles of
Human Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
_____, ed., George Berkeley, Three Dialogues Between Hylas and
Philonous. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Daniel, Stephen H. “George Berkeley, Francis Suarez, and the
Esse-Existere Distinction.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly
74 (2000): 621-36.
_____. “The Ramist Context of Berkeley’s Philosophy.” British Journal
for the History of Philosophy 9 (2001): 487-505.
_____. “Edwards, Berkeley, and Ramist Logic.” Idealistic Studies
31 (2001): 55-72.
_____. “Berkeley’s Pantheistic Discourse.” International Journal for
Philosophy of Religion 49 (2001): 179-94.
_____. “Berkeley's Christian Neoplatonism, Archetypes, and Divine
Ideas.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (2001): 239-58.
_____. “Les limites de la philosophie naturelle de Berkeley.” In Charles
(2004), 163-70.
_____. “Berkeley’s Stoic Notion of Spiritual Substance.” In Daniel,
New Interpretations (2007), 203-30.
_____.”The Harmony of the Leibniz-Berkeley Juxtaposition.” In Leibniz
and the English Speaking World, edited by Stuart Brown and Pauline
Phemister, New York: Spring/Kluwer (2007), 163-80.
_____, ed. New Interpretations of Berkeley’s Thought. Journal of
the History of Philosophy Books Series. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books,
2007.
_____, ed. Reexamining Berkeley’s Philosophy. Toronto: University
of Toronto Press, 2007.
Darren, Hynes. "Berkeley's Corpuscular Philosophy of Time." History
of Philosophy Quarterly, 22 (2005): 339-56.
Darwall, Stephen. “Berkeley’s Moral an Political Philosophy.” In Winkler
(2005), 311-38.
Davis, John W. “The Molyneux Problem.” Journal of the History of
Ideas 21 (1960): 392-408.
Dégremont, Roselyne. Berkeley. L’idée de nature. Paris: Presses
universitaires de France, 1995.
_____. Berkeley. Paris: Ellipses, 1999.
De Montluzin, Emily Lorraine. “Attributions of Authorship in the
Gentleman’s Magazine, 1731-36: A Supplement to the Union List.”
ANQ: A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes, and Reviews
21 (2008): 11-24.
De Waal, Cornelis. “The Real Issue Between Nominalism and Realism:
Peirce and Berkeley Reconsidered.” Transactions of the Charles S.
Peirce Society 32 (1996): 425-33.
_____. “Having an Idea of Matter: A Peircean Refutation of Berkeleyan
Immaterialism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 67 (2006):
291-313.
Dicker, Georges. “Two Arguments from Perceptual Relativity in Berkeley’s
Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous.” Southern Journal of
Philosophy 20 (1982): 409-22.
_____. “Berkeley on the Immediate Perception of Objects.” In Cummins and
Zoeller (1992), 201-13.
_____. “Berkeley on Immediate Perception: Once More Unto the Breach”,
Philosophical Quarterly 56 (2006): 517-35.
_____. “Anti-Berkeley.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy
16 (2008): 335-50.
Di Michele, Stefano. “George Berkeley in America: nostalgia del vedere.”
Annali della Facolta di Lettere e Filosofia 39 (1996): 141-63.
Doney, Willis.
“Is Berkeley’s a Cartesian Mind?.” In Turbayne (1982), 273-82.
_____. “Berkeley’s Argument Against Abstract Ideas.” Midwest Studies
in Philosophy 8 (1983): 295-308.
_____. Berkeley on Abstraction and Abstract Ideas. New York:
Garland, 1989.
Dooren, W. Van. “Whether There Be Any Reason Why Berkeley Is So Often
Misunderstood?.”
Wijsgerig perspectief op maatschappijen en wetenschap
26 (1985-6).
Downing, Lisa J. “Berkeley’s Case Against Realism About Dynamics.” In
Muehlmann (1995), 197-216.
_____. “Siris and the Scope of Berkeley’s Instrumentalism.”
British Journal for the History of Philosophy 3 (1995): 279-300.
_____. “Berkeley’s Natural Philosophy and Philosophy of Science.” In
Winkler (2005), 230-65.
_____. “Occasionalism and Strict Mechanism: Malebranche, Berkeley,
Fontenelle.” In Mercer and O’Neill (2005), 206-30.
Drebushenko, D. “Abstraction and a New Argument for the Esse-Is-Percipi
Thesis.” Hermathena 167 (1999): 35-58.
D’Souza, Paul. “Salvation in Non-Christian Religions: Aristotle and
Berkeley. Philosophical Contribution to a Theological Question”.
Divyadaan 16 (2005): 17-32.
Dubois, Pierre. L’oeuvre de Berkeley. Paris: Vrin, 1985.
Dunn, John; Urmson, J. O; and Ayer, A. J. The British Empiricists:
Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press, 1992.
Dupas, Jean-Claude. “Le visible et l’invisibile chez Berkeley.”
Études irlandaises (1986): 45-56.
Easton, Patricia A., ed., Logic and the Workings of the Mind.
Atascadero: Eastview, 1997.
Eaton, Jeffrey C. “Berkeley’s Immaterialism and the Scientific Promise
of the Christian Doctrine of Creation.” Harvard Theological Review
80 (1987): 431-47.
Eberwein, Robert. “Samuel Johnson, George Cheyne, and the ‘Cone of
Being’.” Journal of the History of Ideas 36 (1975): 153-58.
Echeverri Saldarriaga, Santiago. “’Subjetividad’ e ‘immaterialismo’en la
filosofia de George Berkeley.”
Revista colombiana de filosofia de la ciencia 3 (2002):
179-208; republished in Estudios de filosofia 27 (2003): 127-48.
Egan, Frances. “The Moon Illusion.” Philosophy of Science 65
(1998): 604-23.
Eisenstein, G. “Berkeley’s Presence: Metaphysical Development and
Dialectical Tension.” Idealistic Studies 18 (1988): 207-29.
El-Bizri, Nader. “A
Philosophical Perspective on Alhazen's Optics.”
Arabic Sciences
and Philosophy 15 (2005): 189-218.
Enright, J. T. “The Moon Illusion Examined from a New Point of View.”
Proceedings of the American philosophical society 119 (1975):
87-107.
Eric, Dietrich. “The Bishop and Priest: Toward a Point-of-View Based
Epistemology of True Contradictions.” Logos Architekton. Journal of
Logic and Philosophy of Science 2 (2008): 35-58.
Evans, J. D. G. “Berkeley on Conceiving the Unconceived.” Irish
Journal of Philosophy 2 (1985): 79-93.
Everitt, Nicholas. “Quasi-Berkelyan Idealism as Perspicuous Theism.”
Faith and Philosophy 14 (1997): 353-77.
Falkenstein, Lorne. “Intuition and Construction in Berkeley’s Account of
Physical Space.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (1994):
63-84.
Faris, J. A. “Review of Berkeley: Critical and Interpretative Essays
edited by C. M. Turbayne.” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 26-32.
Fau, Martina. Berkeleys Theorie der visuellen Sprache Gottes: ihre
Bedeutung für die Philosophie des Immaterialismus und ihre historischen
Würzeln. Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1993.
Feuer, Lewis F. “Materialism, Idealism and Science.” Philosophy of
Science 15 (1948): 71-75.
Fimiani, Mariapaola.
George Berkeley: il nome e l’immagine.
Cosenza: Lerici, 1979.
Flage, Daniel E. “Berkeley’s Notions.”
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
45 (1985): 407-25, reprinted in George Berkeley: Critical Assessments,
edited by Walter E. Creery, London and New York: Routledge (1991),
404-24.
_____.“Berkeley
on Abstraction,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (1986):
483-501; reprinted in Berkeley on Abstraction and Abstract Ideas,
edited by Willis Doney, in The Philosophy of George Berkeley Series,
New York: Garland (1988).
_____. Berkeley’s Doctrine of Notions: a Reconstruction Based on his
Theory of Meaning. London: Croom Helm, 1987.
_____. “Relative Ideas and Notions.” In Cummins and Zoeller (1992),
235-53.
_____. “Berkeley, Individuation and Physical Objects.” In Barber and
Gracia (1994), 133-54.
_____. “George Berkeley.” In The Encyclopedia of Empiricism,
edited by Don Garrett and Edward Barbanell. Westport, CT: Greenwood
Press (1997), 44-55.
_____. “Berkeley’s Archetypes.” Hermathena 171 (2001): 7-31.
_____. "Berkeley's Principles, Section 10." Journal of the
History of Philosophy 40 (2003): 543-51.
_____. “Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: The Principles.”
Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (2004): 25-60.
_____. “George Berkeley (1685-1753).” Internet Encyclopedia of
Philosophy (2006).
http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/b/berkeley.htm.
_____. “Berkeley’s
Ideas of Reflection.” Berkeley Newsletter 17 (2006): 7-13.
_____. “Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: The Three Dialogues.” In
Daniel (2008), 45-75.
_____. “Was Berkeley and Ethical Egoist?” Berkeley Studies 19
(2008): 3-18.
_____. “Berkeley’s Contingent Necessities,” Philosophia:
Philosophical Quarterly of Israel 37 (2009): 361-72.
_____. “Remarks on Professor Grandi’s Comments.” Philosophia:
Philosophical Quarterly of Israel 37 (2009): 379-80.
Fleming, N. “Berkeley and Idealism.” Philosophy 60 (1985):
300-325.
_____. “Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: the Principles.”
Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 34 (2004): 25-60.
_____.“Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: the Three Dialogues.” In
Daniel, New Interpretations (2007): 47-75.
Fleming, Patrick. “Berkeley’s Immaterialist Account of Action.”
Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2006): 415-29.
Flew, Anthony. “Was Berkeley a Precursor of Wittgenstein?” In Berman
(1993), 214-26.
Fogelin, Robert. “Hume and Berkeley on the Proofs of Infinite
Divisibility.” Philosophical Review 97 (1988): 47-69.
_____. “The Intuitive Basis of Berkeley’s Immaterialism.” History of
Philosophy Quarterly 13 (1996): 331-44.
_____. Berkeley and the Principles of Human Knowledge. London and
New York: Routledge, 2001.
Forest, Denis. “Language visuel, communication universelle.”
Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger
4 (1997): 429-46.
Foster, John and Robinson, Howard, eds., Essays on Berkeley:a
Tercentennial Celebration. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985.
Fox, Christopher. “Locke and the Scriblerians: the Discussion of
Identity in Early Eighteenth Century England.” Eighteenth-Century
Studies 16 (1982): 1-25.
Frangiotti, Marco Antonio. “Transcendental Idealism and Phenomenalism.”
Critica 26 (1994): 73-95.
Frankel, Henry. “Berkeley’s Concept of Mind as Presented in Book II of
the Principles.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 15 (1977):
37-51.
Frankel, Melissa. “Something-We-Know-Not-What,
Something-We-Know-Not-Why: Berkeley, Meaning, and Minds.” Philosophia
37 (2009): 381-402.
Frederick, R. “Berkeley and the Argument from Conceiving.” Philosophy
Research Archives 13 (1987/88): 481-87.
Friedman, Lesley. “Pragmatism: the Unformulated Method of Bishop
Berkeley.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2003): 81-96.
Fugate, Courtney David. “Berkeley’s Aesthetic of Transcendence.”
Yearbook of the Irish Philosophical Society 2005: 92-117.
Furlong, E. J. “A Berkeleian Nod?.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978):
3.
_____. “Some Puzzles in Berkeley’s Writings.” Hermathena 120
(1976): 63-73.
_____. and Berman, David. “George Berkeley and The Ladies Library.”
Berkeley Newsletter
4 (1980): 4-13.
Garber, Daniel, and Ayers, Michael R., eds.
The Cambridge History of Seventeenth Century Philosophy.
Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1998.
_____, and Longuenesse, Béatrice (eds.). Kant and the Early Moderns.
Princeton University Press (2008).
Garrett, Aaron.
Berkeley's Three dialogues: a reader's guide.
London ; New York : Continuum (2008).
Gatti, Andrea, Inglesi a Napoli nel
viceregno austriaco: Joseph Addison, Lord Shaftesbury, George Berkeley.
Napoli: Vivarium, Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici, 2000.
_____, and Pugliese Carratelli, G. “Per una storia intellettuale
dell'eta Augustea in Inghilterra: Il Catalogue della biblioteca di
Joseph Addison.” Atti della Accademia nazionale dei Lincei.
Rendiconti Classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche 14
(2003): 239-24.
Gaukroger, Stephen, ed. The Uses of Antiquity. Dordrecht: Kluwer,
1991.
Gaustad, Edwin S. “George Berkeley and the New World Community.”
Church History 48 (1979): 5-17.
_____. George Berkeley in America. New Haven and London: Yale
University Press, 1979.
_____. “When in the Course.” William and Mary Quarterly 52
(1995): 479-82.
Gersh, Stephen and Moran, Dermot, eds., Eriugena, Berkeley and the
Idealist Tradition. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame
Press, 2006.
Gibson, Ann and Palmer, Lucia. “George Berkeley’s Visual Language and
the New England Portrait Tradition.” Centennial Review 31 (1987):
122-45.
Glauser, Richard. “Les rélations de significance chez Berkeley.”
Studia Philosophica
42 (1983): 165-200.
_____.
“Berkeley, Collier, et la distinction entre l’esprit fini et le corps. ”
In Brykman (1997), 91-116.
_____.
Berkeley et les philosophes du XVIIe siècle: perception et scepticisme.
Sprimont: Mardaga, 1999.
_____. “La structure de la perception médiate dans la théorie
berkeleyenne de la vision.” in Berlioz (2003), 103-34.
_____. “The Problem of the Unity of a Physical Object in Berkeley.” In
Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 50-81.
Glouberman, Mark. “Abstraction and Determinacy: the Ideological
Background of Berkeleianism.”
Idealistic Studies
(1982): 14-34.
_____. “Consciousness and Cognition: from Descartes to Berkeley.”
Studia Leibnitiana 14 (1982): 244-65.
_____. “Berkeley’s Anti-abstractionism: a Reply to Moked.” Iyyun: The
Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 40 (1991): 315-18.
_____. “Berkeley’s
Anti-abstractionism.” British Journal of the History of Philosophy
2 (1994): 145-63.
Gottenbarn, Donald. “Berkeley: God’s Pain.” Philosophical Studies
28 (1975): 245-54.
Gozzano, Simone. “Mental Images and Their Ontology.” Epistemologia
17 (1994): 225-52.
Graham, Jody. “Common Sense and Berkeley’s Perception by Suggestion.”
International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (1997): 397-423.
Granja, Dulce Maria. “Realismo et idealismo en Berkeley.”
Contrafuerte (1985): 19-27.
Gray, J. “Berkeley’s Theory of Space.” Journal of the History of
Philosophy 16 (1978): 415-34.
Grayling, Anthony C. Berkeley: the Central Arguments. London:
Duckworth, 1986.
_____. “Berkeley’s Argument for Immaterialism.” In Winkler (2005),
166-89.
Greco, John. “Reid’s Critique of Berkeley and Hume: What’s the Big
Idea?.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (1995):
279-96.
Greenberg, A. R. “Reid, Berkeley, and Notional Knowledge.”
Monist
61 (1978): 415-34.
Gruner, Rolf. “Berkeley
on General Ideas.” Dialogue 8 (1969): 481-85.
Grush, Rick.
“Berkeley
and the Spatiality of Vision”. Journal of the History of Philosophy
45 (2007): 413-42.
Guérineau, Roselyne. “Berkeley et les Bermudes.” Revue philosophique
de la France et de l’étranger (1986): 309-17.
Gutiérrez,
Pedro Stepanenko. “La
conception berkeleyana del yo.”
Analisis Filosofico
6 (1986): 13-22.
Hall, Richard A. S. “Did Berkeley Influence Edwards: Their Common
Critique of the Moral Sense Theory”, in Jonathan Edwards’s Writings
, edited by Stephen J. Stein. Bloomington: Indiana University Press,
1996, 100-121.
Hall, Roland. “ ‘New Words in Berkeley’s Writings.”
Berkeley Newsletter
1 (1977): 4-8.
Hamou, Philippe. “Sens et fonction de modèle linguistique dans la
Nouvelle Théorie de la vision.” In Berlioz (2003), 47-78.
_____. “Microscopes et minima visuels. Berkeley critique de l’autopsie
instrumentale.” In Charles (2004), 103-26.
_____. “L'optique des Voyages de Gulliver. ” Revue d'histoire
des sciences 60 (2007): 25-45.
Hanson, Norwood Russell.
“The Dematerialization of Matter.” Philosophy of Science 29
(1962): 27-38.
Hanratty, Gerald. “A Voice in the Wilderness: Berkeley’s Response to
Enlightenment.” Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und
Religionsphilosophie 32 (1990): 319-37.
Hara, Kira. “Depth and Distance in Berkeley’s Theory of Vision.”
History of Philosophy Quarterly 21 (2004): 101-17.
Hardwick, Charles. Berkeley and Peirce, Graduate Studies Texas
Tech. University (1981), 81-85.
Harris, Stephen. “Berkeley’s Argument from Perceptual Relativity.”
History of Philosophy Quarterly 14 (1997): 99-120.
Hatfield, Gary. “The Cognitive Faculties.” In Garber (1998), 953-1002.
Hausman, Alan and Hausman, David. “A New Approach to Berkeley’s Ideal
Reality.” In Muehlmann (1995), 47-66.
_____ and _____. “On Allaire’s ‘Another Visit’.” In Muehlmann (1995),
39-46.
_____ and _____. “Berkeley’s Semantic Dilemma: Beyond the Incoherence
Model.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 13 (1996): 221-38.
Hausman, David B. Descartes’s Legacy: Minds and Meaning in Early
Modern Philosophy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997.
Hayry, Matti and Hayry, Hetta. “Obedience to Rules and Berkeley’s
Theological Utilitarianism.” Utilitas 6 (1994): 233-42.
Henze, D. F. “Descartes vs. Berkeley: a Study in Early Modern
Metaphilosophy.” Metaphilosophy 8 (1977): 147-63.
Hestevold, H. S. “Berkeley’s Theory of Time.” History of Philosophy
Quarterly 7 (1990): 179-92.
Hight, Marc A. “Why We Do Not See What
We Feel.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83 (2002): 148-62.
_____. “Defending Berkeley’s Divine
Ideas.” Philosophia 33 (2005): 97-128.
_____. “Berkeley's Half-Way House.” Philosophy-Compass 1 (2006):
28-35.
_____. “Berkeley and Bodily Resurrection.” Journal of the History of
Philosophy 45
(2007): 443-58.
_____. “Why My Chair is Not Merely A Congeries: Berkeley and the Single
Idea Thesis.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 82-107.
_____.
Idea and Ontology: An Essay in Early Modern Metaphysics of Ideas.
University Park: Penn State University Press, 2008.
_____. and Ott, Walter. “The New
Berkeley.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (2004): 1-24.
Hill, Jonathan. “Gregory of Nyssa, Material Substance and Berkeleyan
Idealism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy
17 (2009): 653– 83.
Hochschild, Joshua P. “George Berkeley and a Theory of Analogy.” The
Downside Review 122 (2004): 157-68.
Hollingshead, G. “Bishop Berkeley and the Gloomy Clerk: Pope’s Final
Satire on Deism.” Durham University Journal (1982): 19-27.
_____. “Berkeley, Blackwell, and Blackwell’s Homer.” Scottish
Literary Journal 11 (1984): 20-35.
_____. “Pope, Berkeley, and the True Key to the Dunciad in Four
Books.” English Studies in Canada 10 (1984): 141-55.
_____. “The Case for Berkeley’s Authorship of The Vanity of
Philosophical Systems.” Eighteenth-Century Life 9 (1985):
51-64.
_____. “Sources for the Ladies’ Library.” Berkeley Newsletter
11 (1989/90): 1-9.
Hone, Joseph M. Bishop Berkeley: His Life, Writings, and Philosophy.
London: Faber & Faber, 1931.
Houghton, Raymond. “International Berkeley Society.” Berkeley
Newsletter 2 (1978): 14-15.
Howell, T. J. “The Bond of Society: Berkeley’s Theory of Social
Reality.” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 16.
Hughes, M. “Hermes and Berkeley.” British Journal for the Philosophy
of Science 43 (1992): 1-19.
Hurley, Michael. “Berkeley and Methodism: a New Letter.” Berkeley
Newsletter 2 (1978): 1-2.
Hynes, Darren. “Berkeley’s Corpuscular Philosophy of Time.” History
of Philosophy Quarterly 22 (2005): 339-56.
Ibañez, Alejandro Herrera. “La nocion de existencia en la ontologia de
Berkeley.”
Analisis Filosofico
6 (1986): 13-22.
Ichinose, Masaki. “Berkeley on Practical Spirit.” Philosophical
Studies 14 (1995): 1-17.
Imlay, Robert A. “Berkeley and Scepticism: a Fatal Dalliance.” Hume
Studies 18 (1992): 501-10.
_____. “Berkeley and Action.” In Muehlmann (1995), 171-82.
Isermann, Michael M. “George
Berkeley’s Language of Vision and the Occult Tradition of Linguistic
Platonism, Part I: Linguistic Platonism in the Renaissance.”
Language & Communication 27 (2007): 369-95.
_____. “George
Berkeley’s Language of Vision and the Occult Tradition of Linguistic
Platonism, Part II: George Berkeley’s Language of Vision and Linguistic
Platonism.”
Language & Communication 28 (2008): 57-92.
Jacob, Alexander. “The Neoplatonic Conception of Nature in More,
Cudworth and Berkeley.” In Gaukroger (1991).
Jacovides, Michael. “How Berkeley Corrupted His Capacity to Conceive.”
Philosophia 37 (2009): 415-29.
Jacquette, Dale. “Berkeley’s Continuity Argument for the Existence of
God.” Journal of Religion 65 (1985): 1-14.
_____. “Reconciling Berkeley’s Microscopes in God’s Infinite Mind.”
Religious Studies
29 (1993): 453-63.
Jaffro, Laurent. “Sensation et imagination. Berkeley et la ‘différence
perçue’.” In Ressemblances et dissemblances dans l’empirisme
britannique, dir. G. Brykman, université Paris 10-Nanterre,
Le Temps philosophique 6 (1999), 71-91.
_____. “La
paideia selon Berkeley et Shaftesbury. Un conflit dans la conception
thérapeutique de la philosophie.” In La philosophie comme médecine de
l’âme à l’âge classique, dir. G. Brykman, Université Paris
10-Nanterre, Le Temps philosophique 9 (2003), 147-73.
_____. “Le cogito de Berkeley.” Archives de philosophie, 67
(2004): 85-111.
_____. “Berkeley’s Criticism of Shaftesbury’s Moral Theory in
Alciphron III.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007),
199-213.
Jakapi, Roomet. Berkeley, Mysteries, and Meaning: a Critique of the
Non-Cognitivist Interpretation, Ph. D. diss., University of Tartu.
Tartu: Tartu University Press, 2002.
_____. “Emotive Meaning and Christian Mysteries in Berkeley’s
Alciphron.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10
(2002): 401-11.
_____. “Faith, Truth, Revelation and Meaning in Berkeley’s Defence of
the Christian Religion (in Alciphron)”, The Modern Schoolman
80 (2002): 23-34.
_____. “Entry 720 of Berkeley’s Philosophical Commentaries and
‘Non-Cognitive’ Propositions in Scripture.” Archiv für Geschichte der
Philosophie 85 (2003): 86-90.
_____. “Was Berkeley a Utilitarian?.” In Lemetti and Piirimäe (2007),
53-68.
_____. “Berkeley and the Separate State of the Soul: A Note.”
Berkeley Studies 18 (2007): 24-28.
_____. “Christian Mysteries and Berkeley’s Alleged Non-Cognitivism”. In
Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007): 188-98.
Jesseph, Douglas M., ed., George Berkeley, De Motu and The
Analyst. A Modern Edition with Introductions and Commentary.
Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academy, 1992.
_____. Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Chicago: University
of Chicago Press, 1993.
_____. “Berkeley, God, and Explanation.” In Mercer and O’Neill (2005),
183-206.
_____. “Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics.” In Winkler (2005),
266-310.
_____. “Faith and Fluxions: Berkeley on Theology and Mathematics.” In
Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 247-60.
Jessop, T. E. “George Berkeley and the Proofs of the Existence of God.”
Journal of Theological Studies 9 (1958): 197-98.
Jolley, Nicholas. “Berkeley and Malebranche on Causality and Volition.”
In Cover (1990), 227-44.
_____. “Berkeley, Malebranche, and Vision in God.” Journal of the
History of Philosophy 34 (1996): 535-48.
Jones, Nick. Starting with Berkeley. London: Continuum, 2009.
Jones, Tom. Pope and Berkeley: the Language of Poetry and Philosophy.
Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
Kabitoglou, E, Douka. “On the Discrimination of Platonisms in Eighteenth
Century England.” Philosophical Inquiry 15 (1993): 20-45.
Kamio, Mitsuo. “The Semantics of Perception: A Romantic Phrase of the
Consciousness.” Journal of the School of Letters 4 (2008): 13-35.
Kasam, A. “Can Berkeley Be Called an Imagist?.” Indian Philosophical
Quarterly 6 (1989): 75-88.
Kassavine, Illia. “Berkeley Revisited: on the New Metaphysics for Social
Epistemology. 90 Years after Materialism and Empiriocriticism.”
Epistemologia 19 (1996): 157-74.
Kearney, John. “Thought, Language and Meaning in Berkeley’s Philosophy.”
The New Scholasticism 49 (1975): 4804-94.
Kearney, Richard. “Berkeley and the Irish Mind.” Études irlandaises
(1986): 7-25.
Kelly, Patrick. “Ireland and the Critique of Mercantilism in Berkeley’s
Querist [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 14.
_____. “Berkeley and Money: Ireland and the Critique of Mercantilism in
Berkeley’s Querist.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 101-16.
_____. “Berkeley and Ireland.” Études irlandaises (1986): 7-25.
_____. “Berkeley’s Servants.” Berkeley Newsletter 14 (1995/96):
13-14.
_____. “Berkeley’s Economic Writings.” In Winkler (2005), 339-68.
Keynes, Geoffrey. “Samuel Johnson and Bishop Berkeley.” The Book
Collector (1981): 177-81.
Kijaczko, Stanislaw. Immaterializm: epistemologia I metafizyka: próba
interpretacij filozofii George’a Berkeleya. Opole: Wydawn.
Uniwersytetu Opolskiego, 2002.
Kingston, F. Temple. The Metaphysics of George Berkeley, 1685-1753:
Irish Philosopher. Lewiston: Mellen, 1992.
Klaas van Berkel, Klaas and Vanderjagt, Arjo, eds., The Book of
Nature in Modern Times. Leuven: Peeters Publishers, 2005
Klein, Lawrence E. “Berkeley, Shaftesbury and the Meaning of
Politeness.” Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture 16 (1986):
57-68.
Klemme, Heiner F. "Causality" in Haakonssen, Knud (ed), The Cambridge
History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy,
Cambridge University Press : Cambridge, 2006,
vol. 1, 368-88.
_____.
"Substances and Modes, Space and Time" in The Cambridge History of
Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, edited by Knud Haakonssen.
Cambridge University Press : Cambridge, 2006,
vol. 1, 343-67.
Kline, David A. “Berkeley’s
Theory of Common Sense.” International Studies in Philosophy 19
(1987): 21-31.
_____. “Berkeley’s Divine Language Argument.” In Berman (1993), 185-99.
Koetsier, Teun and Bergmans, Luc, eds., Mathematics and the Divine. A
Historical Study. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005.
Kohlenberg, Philip. “Bishop Berkeley on Religion and the Church.”
Harvard Theoogical Review 66 (1973): 219-36.
Kohler Ryan, Renee. “De profundis clamavi ad te Domine: The
Existential Significance of Depth for Berkeley, Merleau-Ponty and
Desmond. ”, Yearbook of the Irish Philosophical Society 2005:
237-53.
Kopper, Joachim. Das Unbezügliche als Offenbarsein: Besinnung auf das
philosophische Denken. Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004.
Kroustallis,
Basileios. “Berkeley and the Moon Illusion”, History of Philosophy
Quarterly 21(2004): 151-66.
Kulenkampff, Arend. George Berkeley. München: Beck, 1987.
_____. Esse est percipi. Untersuchungen zur Philosophie George
Berkeleys. Basel: Schwabe, 2001.
Kupfer, Joseph. “Universalization in Berkeley’s Rule-Utilitarianism.”
Revue internationale de philosophie 28 (1974): 511-31.
Lambert, Richard. “Berkeley’s Use of the Relativity Argument.”
Idealistic Studies (1980): 107-21.
_____. “The Literal Intent of Berkeley’s Dialogues.”
Philosophy and Literature 6 (1982).
Lamers, Robert. “Berkeley and Schopenhauer.” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch
(1981): 120-43.
Leary, David E. “Berkeley’s Social Theory: Context and Development.”
Journal of the History of Ideas
38 (1977): 635-49.
Lebrun, G. “Berkeley ou le sceptique malgré lui.” Manuscrito 11
(1988): 33-48.
Leduc-Fayette, Denise. “Qu’est-ce que ‘parler aux yuex’? Berkeley et le
‘langage optique’.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger
4 (1997): 409-27.
Lee, R. N. “What Berkeley’s Notions Are.” Idealistic Studies 20
(1990): 19-41.
Lemetti, Juhana and Piirimäe, Eva, eds. Human Nature as the Basis of
Morality and Society in Early Modern Philosophy. Acta Philosophica
Fennica 83. Helsinki: Philosophical Society of Finland, 2007.
Lennon, Thomas M. “Berkeley and the Ineffable.” Syntheses 75
(1988): 231-50.
_____. “George Berkeley and the Act-Object Distinction.” Dialogue
40 (2001): 651-67.
_____. “The Significance of the Barrovian Case”, Studies in the
History and Philosophy of Science 38 (2007): 36-55.
_____. “The Historical Consistency of Berkeley’s Idealism.” British
Journal for the History of Philosophy
16 (2008): 101-24.
Lavine, Michael. “How to Make a Mistake.” Philosophia 22 (1993):
29-37.
Levin, David Michael, ed. Sites of Vision. Cambridge, Ma: MIT
Press, 1997.
Levine, Michael. “Berkeley’s Theocentric Mentalism: Pantheism?.”
Sophia (1987): 30-41.
_____ and Levi, Neil. “Robinson on Berkeley: ‘Bad Faith’ or Naive
Idealism?.” Idealistic Studies 22 (1992): 163-78.
Levy, David M. “Bishop Berkeley Exorcises the Infinite: Fuzzy
Consequences of Strict Finitism.” Hume Studies 18 (1992): 511-36.
_____. “ ‘Magic Buffalo’ and Berkeley’s ‘Theory of Vision’: Learning in
Society.”
Hume Studies
19 (1993): 223-26.
Leyvraz, Jean-Pierre. “La notion de Dieu chex Berkeley.” Revue de
theologie et de philosophie (1980): 241-52.
Lievers, Menno. “The Molyneux Problem.” Journal of the History of
Philosophy 30 (1992): 399-416.
Llamas-Gómez, Clara Isabel. “Introduction to ‘Berkeley’s Crossroads’.”
Berkeley Newsletter 14 (1995/96): 1-4.
Lloyd, Peter B. Consciousness and Berkeley’s Metaphysics. London:
Ursa, 1999.
_____.
Paranormal Phenomena and Berkeley’s Metaphysics.
London: Ursa, 1999.
Lord, S. K. “Berkeleian Linguistics.” Linguistics 213 (1978):
5-28.
Louet, D. “La critique de l’absolutisme newtonien chez Leibniz et
Berkeley.” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 93 (1988): 447-68.
Lowe, E. J. Personal Agency: The Metaphysics of Mind and Action.
Oxford University Press (2008).
Lucash, Frank S. “The Nature of Mind.” Giornale di Metafisica 13
(1991): 89-107.
Luce, A. A. “Berkeley and the Living Thing.” Hermathena 123
(1977): 19-25.
Luce, J. V. “Yale College and the Acquisition of Whitehall.”
Berkeley Newsletter
15 (1997/98): 19-22.
Lutterfelds, Wilhelm. “Kant oder Berkeley? Zum aktuellen Streit um den
korrecten Realismus.” Perspektiven der Philosophie 22 (1996):
305-40.
Lyons, William. “Dysart Castle: George Berkeley’s Childhood Home.”
Berkeley Newsletter 12 (1991/92): 11-15.
Mahon, James Edwin. “Review of The Rhetoric of Berkeley’s Philosophy
by Peter Walmsley.”
Berkeley Newsletter
14 (1995/96): 15-17.
Maia Neto, José R. “Academic Skepticism in Early Modern Philosophy.”
Journal of the History of Ideas 58 (1997): 199-220.
Malherbe, Michel. “Husserl
critique de Berkeley.”
Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger
(1986): 355-66.
Malherbe, Michel. “La critique husserlienne des idées abstraites selon
Berkeley.”
History of European Ideas
7 (1986): 623-32.
Mall, Ram Adhar. Der operative Begriff des Geistes: Locke, Berkeley,
Hume. Freiburg, Breisgau: Alber, 1984.
Mancino, Michele.
“Il Mezzogiorno nei diari (1717) del ‘Viaggio in Italia’ di George
Berkeley.” In Atti delle giornate di studio: Il turismo culturale in
Campania. Napoli, Quaderni dell’Università degli studi “Federico
II”, 2004, 271-304.
Mathauser, Zdenek. “The Theory of Reflection in Aesthetics and the
Heritage of George Berkeley.” (in Czechoslovakian), Estetika 11
(1974): 30-52.
Mattey, G. J. “Kant’s Conception of Berkeley’s Idealism.” Kantstudien
74 (1983): 161-75.
McCracken, Charles J. “What Does Berkeley’s God See in the Quad?.”
Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 61 (1979): 280-92.
_____. Malebranche and British Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon
Press, 1983.
_____. “Berkeley’s Conception of Idea [Abstract].” Berkeley
Newsletter 8 (1985): 14-16.
_____. “Berkeley’s Notion of Spirit.” History of European Ideas 7
(1986): 597-602.
_____. “Stages on a Cartesian Road to Immaterialism.” Journal of the
History of Philosophy 24 (1986): 19-40.
_____. “Berkeley’s Cartesian Concept of Mind: the Return Through
Malebranche and Locke to Descartes.” Monist 71 (1988): 596-611.
_____. “Berkeley on the Relation of Ideas to the Mind.” in Cummins and
Zoeller (1992), 187-200.
_____. “Godless Immaterialism: on Atherton’s Berkeley.” in Muehlmann
(1995), 249-60.
_____. “Demons that Deceive, Gods that Perceive, and the Limits of
Skepticism.” in Brykman (1997), 73-89.
_____. “Knowledge of the Existence of Bodies.” In Garber (1998), 624-48.
_____. “George Berkeley.” In Companion to Early Modern Philosophy,
edited by Steven Nadler. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002, 437-55.
_____. “Berkeley’s Realism.” In Daniel, New Interpretations
(2007), 23-44.
_____ and Tipton, Ian, eds., Berkeley’s Principles and Dialogues:
Background Source Materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
2000.
McDonough, Jeffrey K. “Berkeley,
Human Agency and Divine Concurrentism,”
Journal of the History of Philosophy
46 (2008): 567-90.
McGowan, William. “The Dream of Ezra Stiles: Bishop Berkeley’s Haunting
of New England.” Studies in Eighteenth- Century Culture (1982):
181-98.
McGowan, William. “Did Berkeley Write The Irish Blasters?.”
Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 1-4.
_____. “George Berkeley’s American Declaration of Independence.”
Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture 12 (1983): 105-13.
_____. “Berkeley Kicking His Own Stones.” Indian Philosophical
Quarterly 16 (1989): 81-102.
McIntyre, J. “George Berkeley and the Proofs of the Existence of God.”
Scottish Journal of Theology 15 (1962): 420-23.
McKim, Robert. “Wenz on Abstract Ideas and Christian Neoplatonism in
Berkeley.” Journal of the History of Ideas (1982): 665-71.
_____. “The Entries in Berkeley’s Notebooks: a Reply to Bertil
Belfrage.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 156-61.
_____. “Luce’s Account of the Development of Berkeley’s Immaterialism.”
Journal of the History of Ideas 48 (1987): 649-69.
_____. “Review of Theodore Young: Completing Berkeley’s Project:
Classical vs. Modern Philosophy.” Berkeley Newsletter 10
(1987/88): 13-16.
_____. “What Is Berkeley’s God Doing in the Quad?.” Philosophy
Research Archives 13 (1987/88): 637-53.
_____. “Review of Ernest Sosa, Essays on the Philosophy of George
Berkeley.” Berkeley Newsletter 11 (1989/90): 28-32.
_____. “Berkeley on Private Ideas and Public Objects.” in Cummins and
Zoeller (1992), 215-33.
_____. “Abstraction and Immaterialism: Recent Interpretations.”
Berkeley Newsletter 15 (1997/98): 1-13.
_____. “Berkeley’s Notebooks.” In Winkler (2005), 63-93.
McRae, Robert. “’Idea’ as a Philosophical Term in the Seventeenth
Century.” Journal of the History of Ideas 26 (1965): 175-90.
Meattini, Valerio. “Berkeley e l’Italia.” Critica storica 19
(1982): 3-21.
Mel’vil’, I. K. And Sushko, S. A. “Argument Doktora Dzhonsona: Semiuel
Dzhonson kak kritik Berkli.” Voprosy Filosofii 3 (1981): 133-44.
Mensch, Jennifer. “Kant and the Problem of Idealism: On the Significance
of the Göttingen Review.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 44
(2006): 297-317.
Mercer, Christia and O’Neill, Eileen, eds. Early Modern Philosophy:
Mind, Matter and Metaphysics, New York: Oxford University Press,
2005.
Migely, Geneviève. “Berkeley’s Actively Passive Mind.” In Daniel,
Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 153-71.
Mirarchi, L. A. “Force and Absolute Motion in Berkeley’s Philosophy of
Physics.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977): 705-13.
_____. “A Rejoinder to Bruce Silver’s Reply.” Journal of the History
of Ideas 38 (1977): 716-18.
Moked, Gabriel. Particles and Ideas: Berkeley’s Corpuscularian
Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.
Moked, Gabriel. “A Note on Berkeley’s Anti-Abstractionism.” Iyyun
40 (1991): 95-99.
_____. “Two Central Issues in Bishop Berkeley’s ‘Corpuscularian
Philosophy’ in the Siris.” History of European Ideas 7
(1986): 643-49.
Montero, B. H. “La realidad en Kant y Berkeley.”
Revista de Filosofia de la Universidad de Costa Rica
23 (1985): 49-69.
Monti, Maria Teresa. “Theories
‘providentialistes’ de la vision.
Chirurgiens et philosophes entre Berkeley et Molyneux.” in
Wissenschaften und Musik unter dem Einfluß einer sich ändernden
Geisteshaltung, edited by M. Büttner. Bochum: Universitätsverlag N.
Brockmeyer, 1992, 69-76.
_____. “’Scrittura’ e ‘commento’: il
codice berkeleiano della percezione. Problemi medici e teorie
filosofiche.” In L’interpretazione nei secoli XVI e XVII , edited
by Guido Canziani and Yves-Charles Zarka. Milano: F. Angeli, 1993,
387-406.
_____, ed., Teorie della visione e problemi di percezione visiva
nell’età moderna. Milano: Franco Angeli, 1995.
_____. “Isomorphisme, signes naturals et “prophéties”: les suggestions
de Descartes et les solutions de Berkeley.”
In Brykman (1997), 117-48.
de Montluzin, Emily Lorraine. “Attributions of Authorship in the
Gentleman's Magazine, 1731-36: A Supplement to the Union List”.
A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes, and Reviews 21
(2008): 11-24.
Mooney, Timothy. “Irish Cartesian and Proto-Phenomenologist: The Case of
Berkeley.” Yearbook of the Irish Philosophical Society 2005:
213-36.
Moreau, J. “Berkeley et le schématisme.”
Kantstudien
79 (1988): 286-92.
Morgan, Vance. “Kant
and Dogmatic Idealism: A Defence of Kant’s Refutation of Berkeley.”
Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (1993): 217-37.
Morris, David. “Optical Idealism and the Languages of Depth in Descartes
and Berkeley.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 35 (1997): 363-92.
Mourant, John A. “Berkeley and Religious Language.” In Explanation.
The Hague: Nijhoff, 1973, 73-88.
Muehlmann, Robert G. “Berkeley’s Ontology and the Epistemology of
Idealism.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 8 (1978): 89-111.
_____. “The Role of Perceptual Relativity in Berkeley’s Philosophy.”
Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1991): 397-425.
_____. Berkeley’s Ontology. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1992.
_____, ed., Berkeley’s Metaphysics. Structural, Interpretive, and
Critical Essays. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State Press, 1995.
_____. “Berkeley’s Problem of Sighted Agency.” In Muehlmann (1995),
149-70.
_____. “The Substance of Berkeley’s Philosophy.” In Muehlmann (1995),
89-106.
_____. “Strong and Weak Heterogeneity in Berkeley’s New Theory of
Vision.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 121-44.
Mugnai, Paolo F. Segno e linguaggio in George Berkeley.
Roma: ed. dell’Ateneo, 1979.
Mun Seong-Hwa. Berkeley und Hegel: eine Untersuchung zur logischen
Dingkonstitution und zur dialektischen Bewußtseinsdeskription. Ph.
D. diss., University of
Düsseldorf, 1997.
Murray, Patrick. “Berkeley and Money: Money, Wealth, and Berkeley’s
Doctrine of Signs: a Reply to Patrick Kelly.” Hermathena 139
(1985): 152-56.
Nadler, Steven. “Berkeley’s Ideas and the Primary/Secondary Quality
Distinction.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (1990): 47-61.
_____, ed. Causation in Early Modern Philosophy. University Park:
Pennsylvania State University Press, 1993.
Nanavati, Shaun. “A
history and experimental analysis of the moon illusion.” The New
School Psychology Bulletin 6.
Neri, Luigi.
“’Filling the
World with a Mite’: un paradosso dell’infinita divisibilità negli
scritti giovanili di George Berkeley.”, Rivista di filosofia 71
(1980): 67-97.
_____. “Esperienza, metafisica e geometria nel pensiero di Berkeley.”
Rivista di filosofia 76 (1985): 239-67.
_____. “Il caso Siris, ovvero la
‘seconda filosofia’ di George Berkeley vescovo di Cloyne.” Giornale
critico della filosofia italiana (1990): 320-41.
_____. George Berkeley. Filosofia e critica dei linguaggi scientifici.
Bologna: CLUEB, 1991.
_____. “Fenomenismo e realismo in George Berkeley”, Giornale Critico
della Filosofia Italiana 3 (2005): 470-94.
Newburgh, R. “Did Berkeley foreshadow Mach? American Journal of
Physics, 76 (2008): 189-190.
Nezinska, E. “To Make Truth Glide Into the Soul [in Czechoslovakian].”
Filozofia 47 (1992): 310-12.
Nielsen, Harry. “A Categorical Difficulty in Berkeley.” Philosophical
Research Archives (1980).
Norton-Smith, T. M. “Sending an Irishman ‘Realing’: Constructive Realism
and George Berkeley’s Philosophy of Arithmetic.” Midwest Quarterly. A
Journal of Contemporary Thought 42 (2001): 199-211.
Nuchelmans, G. “Berkeleys
betekenisleer.”
Wijsgerig perspectief
(1985-6).
Oaklander, L. N. “The Inherence Interpretation of Berkeley: a Critique.”
Modern Schoolman 54 (1977): 261-69.
Oakes, Robert A. “God and Physical Objects.” International Journal of
the Philosophy of Religion 9 (1978): 16-29.
O’Callaghan, John P. Thomist Realism and the Linguistic Turn: Toward
a More Perfect Form of Existence. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of
Notre Dame Press, 2003.
Oekerijee, S. K. “Descartes, Berkeley, and the External World.”
Indian Philosophical Quarterly 23 (1996): 77-93.
Oertel, Hans Joachim. George Berkeley und die englische Literatur.
Unveränd. Reprogr. Nachdr. D. 1 Aufl., Halle a. d. Saale: Niemeyer 1934
(Walluf bei Wiesbaden: Sändig, 1973).
O'Gorman, Frank and Donald, Diana, eds., Ordering the World in the
Eighteenth Century. Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
O’Grady, Paul. “Review of Berkeley, De Motu and The Analyst:
a Modern Edition with Introductions and Commentary. Edited by Douglas M.
Jesseph.” Berkeley Newsletter 13 (1993/94): 4-8.
O’Higgins, J. “Browne and King, Collins and Berkeley: Agnosticism or
Anthropomorphism?.” Journal of Theological Studies 27 (1976):
88-112.
Olszewski, Mikołaj. George Berkeley:
Alkifron.
Kęty:
Wydawnictwo Marek Derewiecki (2008).
Ong-Van-Cung, Kim Sang, ed. La voie des idées? Le statut de la
représentation XVIIè-XXè siècles, Paris: CNRS éditions, 2006.
Orlando, Eleonora. “Sobre el idealismo de Berkeley.” Revista de
Filosofia 7 (1992): 53-68.
Ott, Walter. “The Cartesian Context of Berkeley’s Attack on
Abstraction.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (2004): 407-24.
_____. “Descartes and Berkeley on Mind: the Fourth Distinction”,
British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (2006): 437-50.
_____. Causation and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Philosophy.
Oxford: Oxford University Press (2009).
Pabst, Manfred. Berkeley, Joyce, Beckett: Reflexionen und
Interpretationen. Wiesbaden: Volkshochschule Wiesbaden e. V., 1997.
Pappas, George. “Ideas, Minds and Berkeley.” American Philosophical
Quarterly (1980): 181-94.
_____. “Adversary Metaphysics.” Philosophy Research Archives 9
(1983): 571-86.
_____. “Abstract Ideas and the Esse is Percipi Thesis.”
Hermathena 139 (1985): 47-62.
_____. “Abstract Ideas and Unperceived Existent Sensible Objects
[Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 16.
_____. “Science and Metaphysics in Berkeley.” International Studies
in the Philosophy of Science 2 (1987): 105-14.
_____. “Berkeley and Common Sense Realism.” History of Philosophy
Quarterly 8 (1991): 27-42.
_____. “Berkeleian Idealism and Impossible Performances.” In Muehlmann
(1995), 127-48.
_____. “The Metaphysics of George Berkeley, 1685-1753.” International
Studies in Philosophy 29 (1997): 126-27.
_____. “Berkeley and Scepticism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological
Research 59 (1999): 133-49.
_____. Berkeley’s Thought. Ithaca and London: Cornell University
Press, 2000.
_____. “Les idées abstraites et la Nouvelle théorie de la vision.” In
Charles (2004), 37-58.
_____. “Berkeley’s Assessment of Locke’s Epistemology.” In Daniel,
Reexamining Berkeley (2007),
29-49.
Parigi, Silvia. “George Berkeley e l’illusione lunare.” Rivista di
storia della scienza 4 (1987): 51-60.
_____. “La quaestio di Barrow: un’aporia della visione tramite
lenti.” Nuncius 3 (1988): 65-69.
_____. “Il problema di Molyneux: avventure filosofiche di ciechi,
neonati e di alcuni animali.”
BioLogica
4 (1990): 171-207.
_____. “’The Horse Is in the Stable, the Books are in the Study as
Before’: appunti per una storia della storiografia berkeleiana.”
Bollettino filosofico dell’Università della Calabria
9 (1991): 113-34.
_____. “I filosofi e il microscopio: da Descartes a Berkeley.”
Rivista di storia della scienza 1 (1993): 155-72.
_____. Il mondo visibile. George Berkeley e la ‘perspectiva’.
Firenze: Olschki, 1995.
_____, ed., George Berkeley, Opere filosofiche Torino: UTET,
1996.
_____. “Is There a Cartesian Road to Immaterialism?.”
In Brykman (1997), 23-48.
_____. “Caverne, terremoti, fossili e vulcani negli Scritti di storia
naturale di George Berkeley.” In Segni e percorsi della modernità,
edited by Ferdinando Abbri and Marco Segala. Arezzo: Università degli
studi di Siena, 2000, 77-105.
_____. “Teoria e storia del problema di Molyneux”, Laboratorio
dell’ISPF 1 (2004):
www.ispf.cnr.it/ispf-lab.
_____. “Review: Kenneth P. Winkler (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to
Berkeley, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005” Philosophy
in Review 27 (2007): 407-9.
Park, Désirée. Complementary Notions: a Critical Study of Berkeley’s
Theory of Concepts. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1972.
_____. “Notions: the Counter-Poise of the Berkeleyan Ideas.”
Giornale di Metafisica (1981): 243-65.
_____. “Prior and Williams on Berkeley.” Philosophy (1981):
231-41.
_____. “Supplement to the Editor’s Introduction to the Philosophical
Commentaries.” In The Works of George Berkeley Bishop of Cloyne,
edited by A. A. Luce and T. E. Jessop.
Nendeln, Lichtenstein: Kraus Reprint, 1982.
_____. “Berkeley’s Rejection of Anselm’s Argument.” Anselm Studies,
An Occasional Journal 1 (1983): 103-9.
_____. “Facts and Reasons Concerning Berkeley’s Reprinted Works.”
Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 14-16.
_____. “The Berkeleyan Scheme of Things and Some Consequences.”
Giornale di Metafisica 19 (1988): 17-41.
Patey, Douglas. “Johnson’s Refutation of Berkeley: Kicking the Stone
Again.”
Journal of the History of Ideas
47 (1986): 139-47.
Pearce, Kenneth L. “The Semantics of Sense Perception in Berkeley”.
Religious Studies: An International Journal for the Philosophy of
Religion.
44(2008): 249-68.
Peterschmitt, Luc. “La critique du réalisme leibnizien dans le De
Motu de Berkeley.” Astérion (asterion.revues.org) 1 (2003):
112-26.
_____. “Berkeley et les hypothèses mathématiques”, Archives
internationales d´histoire des sciences 150-151 (2003): 184-97.
_____. Sciences de la nature et philosophie dans la pensée de
Berkeley, Ph. D. diss., Université Lille 3, 2005.
Philipse, H. “Leidt consequentie altijd naar de duivel? Een analyse van
de argumentatie voor Berkeleys immaterialisme.” Wijsgerig perspectief
(1985-86).
Phillips, M. “Berkeley sur la volonté.” Quelques notes philosophiques
(1985): 252-58.
_____. “L’actualité et l’immaterialisme de Berkeley.” Revue
philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986): 373-76.
_____. “On Translating Berkeley’s Principles.” History of
European Ideas 7 (1986): 609-16.
Piper, Willam Bowman. “Kant’s Contact with British Empiricism.”
Eighteenth-Century Studies 12 (1978/79): 174-89.
Pitcher, George. Berkeley. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977.
_____. “Berkeley on the Perception of Objects.” Journal of the
History of Philosophy 24 (1986): 99-105.
_____. Berkeley on Vision: a Nineteenth-Century Debate. New York:
Garland, 1988.
_____, ed., The Philosophy of George Berkeley. New York: Garland,
1988-1989, 15 vols.
Popkin, Richard H., ed., Scepticism in the History of Philosophy: a
Pan-American Dialogue.
Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996.
Priest, Stephen.
The British Empiricists: Hobbes to Ayer.
London: Penguin, 1990.
Pucelle, Jean. “Berkeley a-t-il été influencé par Malebranche?.”
Etudes philosophiques
1 (1979): 19-38.
Pycior, H. M. “Mathematics and Philosophy: Wallis, Hobbes, Barrow, and
Berkeley.” Journal of the History of Ideas 48 (1987): 265-86.
Quintanilla Navarro, Ignacio. George Berkeley (1685-1753).
Madrid: Ediciones del Orto, 1995.
_____. Materia y sentido en George Berkeley. Universidad
Complutense de Madrid: Servicio de Publicaciones Contribuidor Rábade
Romeo, Sergio Fecha de Publicación (2002).
Rabate, Jean-Michel. “Berkeley entre Joyce et Beckett.” Études
irlandaises (1986): 57-76.
Radcliffe, Elizabeth S., and McCarty, Richard ; with Allhoff, Fritz and
Vaidya, Anand Jayprakash, eds. Late Modern Philosophy:Essential
Readings with Commentary. Malden, MA Oxford: Blackwell,
2007.
Raiger, Michael Kenneth. Coleridge, Hartley, and Berkeley:
Philosophy, Religion, and Politics, 1794-1796, Ph. D. diss., New
York University, 2002.
Raine, Kathleen. “Berkeley, Blake and the New Age.” Thought 51
(1976): 356-77.
Rashid, Salim. “Berkeley’s Querist and its Influence.” Journal
of the History of Economic Thought 12 (1990): 38-60.
_____. “Exciting the Industry of Mankind: George Berkeley’s Philosophy
of Money.” History of Political Economy 34 (2002): 818-19.
Raynor, David. “Minima Sensibilia in Berkeley and Hume.”
Dialogue
19 (1980): 196-200.
_____. “Review of Pierre Dubois, L’Oeuvre de Berkeley.”
Berkeley Newsletter
9 (1986): 19-21.
_____. “Berkeley’s Ontology.” Dialogue 26 (1987): 611-20.
_____. “Hume and Berkeley’s Three Dialogues”, in Studies in
the Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment, edited by M. A.
Stewart. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990, 231-50.
_____. “Berkeley et la théorie des minima sensibilia.” In Charles
(2004), 89-102.
Rebaglia, Alberta. “Essere e percepire
una struttura linguistica: il pensiero di George Berkeley quale
presupposto filosofico.” Epistemologia 12 (1989): 125-52.
Reininger, Robert. Locke, Berkeley,
Hume. Reprint d. Ausg. München: E. Reinhardt, 1922.
Nendeln/Liechtenstein: Kraus, 1973.
Richetti, John J. Philosophical Writing: Locke, Berkeley,
Hume. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1983.
Richmond, Alasdair, ed. Berkeley’s Principles of Human Knowledge: A
Reader’s Guide. London: Continuum, 2009.
Risse, Heinz. Berkeley und der Demiurg: Requiem auf das Spiel in der
Sackgasse. Bielefeld: Merlin, 1983.
Roberts, John. A Metaphysics for the Mob: The Philosophy of George
Berkeley. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Robinson, Howard M. ‘Abstract Ideas’ and Immaterialism.” History of
European Ideas 7 (1986): 617-22.
_____. “Berkeley” in Bunnin (1996).
_____, ed., George Berkeley, Principles of Human Knowledge and Three
Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
_____. “Review:
Berkeley's Thought.”
Mind; 113 (2004): 571-75.
Robles, José A. “Perceptión y infinitesimales en Berkeley I.” Diánoia
26 (1980): 151-77.
_____.
“Perceptión y infinitesimales en Berkeley II.” Diánoia 27 (1981):
166-85.
_____. “Matemáticas hasta el siglo XVIII. ¿Qué son los números?.”
Diánoia 28 (1982): 155-71.
_____. “Berkeley y su crítica a los fundamentos del cálculo.” Revista
Latinoamericana de Filosofia 10:2 (1984): 141-50.
_____. “Génesis de la noción de sustancia espiritual en la filosofia de
Berkeley.” Diánoia 30 (1984): 67-87.
_____. “George Berkeley, Commentarios filosoficos, Introduccion y
traduccion.” Contrafuerte (1985): 4-11.
_____. “Berkeley y los minima.”
Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986): 1-12.
_____. “Berkeley: argumentacion filosofica.” Revista Latino Americano
de Filosofia 12 (1986): 45-53.
_____. “The Mottoes in the Analyst Debate.” Berkeley
Newsletter 9 (1986): 15-16.
_____. “Berkeley: distinción y separación.”
Dialogues
24 (1989): 81-102.
_____. “Hobbes, Berkeley y las ideas abstractas.” Revista de
Filosofia 12 (1989): 43-54.
_____.
The Mathematical Ideas of George Berkeley,
Ph. D. diss., Stanford University, 1990.
_____. Estudios berkeleianos. Mexico:Universidad Autónoma de
México, 1990.
_____.”Berkeley: Scepticism, Matter and Infinite Divisibility.” In
Popkin (1996).
_____. “Filosofia
natural y religion. Los casos de Newton, Boyle y Berkeley.” Revista
Patagonica de Filosofia 2 (2001): 43-56.
_____. “Philosophie naturelle et religion: les cas de Newton, Boyle et
Berkeley.” In Charles (2004), 11-22.
_____.
“Newton y Berkeley: atomistas epicureos. ”
Revista
Latinoamericana de Filosofia 30 (2004): 7-35.
Rodrigues da Silva, Marcos.
“Instrumentalismo e explicaçao cientifica no De motu de Berkeley.”
Scientiae Studia 4 (2006): 101-14.
Rogers, Karen.
“Two Mistakes About Berkeley.”
Philosophy (1980): 552-53.
Ronchi, Vasco. Commento alla Nuova teoria della visione di George
Berkeley. Firenze: Baccini & Chiappi, 1973. Estratto da: Atti
della fondazione Giorgio Ronchi 29 (1974).
Rose, Thomasine. Verbivocovisual: the Presence of Bishop Berkeley in
Finnegans Wake. S. L.: Bellefonte Editeur, 1981.
Rosenbaum, S. E. “Berkeley’s World of Ideas.” History of Philosophy
Quarterly 2 (1985): 421-34.
Rotem, Ornan. “An Encounter Between Philosophy and Religion.” Asian
Philosophy 3 (1993): 15-28.
Ryann, Todd. “A new Account of Berkeley’s Likeness Principle.”
British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (2006): 561-80.
Ryder, John. “Cadwallader, Colden, Samuel Johnson, and the Activity of
Matter: Materialism and Idealism in Colonial America.” Transactions
of the Charles S. Peirce Society 32 (1996): 248-72.
Saidel, Eric. “Making Sense of Berkeley’s Challenge.” History of
Philosophy Quarterly 10 (1993): 325-39.
Sanyal, Shyamali. “George Berkeley on the Problem of Universals.”
Indian Philosophical Quarterly 10 (1983): 7-12.
Saporiti, Katia. Die Wirklichkeit der Dinge : eine Untersuchung des
Begriffs der Idee in der Philosophie George Berkeleys. Frankfurt am
Main: Klostermann, 2006.
Sasso, Javier. “Immaterialismo y verificacionismo en Filosofia del
entendimiento.” Revista Latinamericana de Filosofia 8 (1982):
247-54.
Scala, André. Berkeley. Paris: Belles Lettres, 2007.
Scallett, Jeffrey.
“A Sequel to Berkeley’s Dialogues: Excerpts.” Dialogue 17
(1974): 1-6.
Schumacher, R. “Critique of Representationalism and Immaterialism. An
Overview of the Scholarly Literature on the Theories of George
Berkeley.” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 58 (2004):
279-97.
_____. “The Cognitive Impenetrability of Optical Illusions. George
Berkeley's Theory of Visual Perception in the Context of New
Approaches”, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 58 (2004):
505-26.
_____. “Berkeley on Visible Figure and Extension.” In Daniel,
Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 108-20.
_____.“Action
in perception? Empirical and philosophical arguments against the
enactive approach to perception.”
Perception
37 (2008): 433-45.
Schwartz, Robert. Vision: Variations on Some Berkeleian Themes.
Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.
_____. “Seeing Distance from a Berkeleian Perspective.” In Muehlmann
(1995), 217-30.
_____. Visual Versions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006.
Sherry, David. “The Wake of Berkeley’s Analyst: Rigor
Mathematicae?.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 18
(1987): 455-80.
_____. “Don’t Take Half the Way : On Berkeley’s Mathematical Reasoning.”
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 24, 2 (1993):
207-25.
Silver, Bruce. “The Conflicting Microscopic Worlds of Berkeley’s
Three Dialogues.” Journal of the History of Ideas 37 (1976):
343-49.
_____. “The Invisible World of Berkeley’s New theory of vision.”
New Scholasticism 51 (1977): 142-61.
_____. “A Reply to Professor Mirachi.” Journal of the History of
Ideas 38 (1977): 714-15.
Silver, Bruce. “Boswell on Johnson’s Refutation of Berkeley: Revisiting
the Stone.” Journal of the History of Ideas 54 (1993): 437-48.
Skemp, Sheila. “George Berkeley’s Newport Experience.” Rhode Island
History 37 (1978): 53-63.
Sorensen, Roy. Seeing Dark Things: The Philosophy of Shadows.
Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press (2008).
Sosa, Ernest. “Russell,
Berkeley y la materia objectivo.” Critica 7 (1975): 35-41.
_____. “Berkeley’s Master Stroke [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter
8 (1985): 16-18.
_____, ed., Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley.
Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987.
Spicker, Gideon. Uber das Verhältnis der Naturwissenschaft der
Philosophie: Kant, Hume und Berkeley. Hildesheim: Olms, 2006.
Spiegel, James S. “The Theological Orthodoxy of Berkeley’s
Immaterialism.” Faith and Philosophy 13 (1996): 216-35.
_____. “The Christian Psychology of George Berkeley.” Journal of
Psychology and Christianity 17 (1998): 335-46.
Spinicci, Paolo. La visione e il
liguaggio: considerazioni sull’applicabilità del modello linguistico
all’esperienza. Milano: Guerini, 1992.
_____, ed., George Berkeley, Teoria
della visione.
Milano: Guerini, 1995.
Stack, George J. “Berkeley’s Concept of Existence.” Modern Schoolman
53 (1976): 281-89.
_____. Berkeley’s Analysis of Perception. New York: Lang, 1991.
Stadelmann, Elke. Philosophie aus der Besinnung des Denkens auf sich
selbst: Berkeley und Kant. Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1999.
Stammler, Gerhard. Berkeleys Philosophie der Mathematik.
Unveränd. Neudr. D. Ausg. Berlin 1921.Vaduz: Topos, 1978.
Stanford, W. B. “Berkeley and the Libyan Monster.” Berkeley
Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 10-11.
Steinkraus, Warren E. “A Piece of Sensible Bread.” Indian
Philosophical Quarterly 5 (1978): 619-25.
_____. “Review of Houghton, Berman, Lapan, Images of Berkeley.”
Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 17-18.
Stepanenko, Pedro. “La concepcion berkeleyana del yo.” Contrafuerte
(1985): 12-18.
Stephens, John, ed., The Guardian. Kentucky: The University
Press, 1982.
_____. “Berkeley and Lady Burlington: a Footnote.” Berkeley
Newsletter 12 (1991/92): 16-17.
Sterling, M. C. “Berkeley contra el realismo.” Sapienta 33
(1978): 153-55.
Stewart, Jon. “Borges and the Refutation of Idealism: A Study of ‘Tlon
Uqbar, Orbis Tertius’.” Ideas y Valores (1996): 64-99.
Stewart, M. A. “William Wishart, an Early Critic of Alciphron.”
Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 5-9.
_____. “Berkeley and the Rankenian Club [Abstract].” Berkeley
Newsletter 8 (1985): 19.
_____. “Berkeley and the Rankenian Club.” Hermathena 139 (1985):
25-46.
_____. “Add MS. 39305 [Review].” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986):
6-11.
_____. “Review of Berkeley, Oeuvres, tom. I, edited by Geneviève
Brykman.” Berkeley Newsletter 10 (1987/88): 10-13.
_____. “Berkeley’s Introduction Draft.” Berkeley Newsletter 11
(1989/90): 10-19.
_____. “Reid on Locke and Personal Identity: Some Lost Sources.”
Locke Newsletter 28 (1997): 105-16.
Stoneham, Tom. Berkeley’s World: An Examination of the Three
Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press, 2002.
_____. “Review:
Berkeley and the Principles of
Human Knowledge.” Mind 112 (2003): 126-30.
_____. “George Berkeley: A Treatise Concerning the Principles of
Human Knowledge.” In Central Works of Philosophy. The Seventeenth
and Eighteenth Centuries, edited by John Shand. Montreal:
McGinn-Queen’s University Press, 2005.
Storhoff, Gary. “The Artist as Universal Mind: Berkeley’s Influence on
Charles Johnson.” African American Review 30 (1996): 539-48.
Stroll, Avrum. “Two Lines of Argumentation in Berkeley’s Principles:
a Reply to George S. Pappas.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 139-44.
Stroud, Barry. “Berkeley vs. Locke on Primary Qualities.” Philosophy
55 (1980): 149-66.
Stuart, James. “Berkeley’s Appearance/Reality Distinction.”
Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 8 (1977): 119-30.
Stubenberg, L. “Divine Ideas: the Cure-All for Berkeley’s
Immaterialism.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 28 (1990): 221-49.
Szabo, Zoltan Gendler. “Berkeley’s Triangle.” History of Philosophy
Quarterly 12 (1995): 41-63.
_____. “Sententialism and Berkeley’s Master Argument.” Philosophical
Quarterly 55 (2005): 462-74.
Szalek, Piotr. "O genezie Berkeleyowskiej definicji "istnienia"."
["On the Genesis of the Berkeleian Definition of 'Existence'", in
Polish] In Stanislaw Janeczek, ed. Oblicza filozofii XVII wieku [Faces
of the XVIIth-Century Philosophy, in Polish]. Lublin: Wydawnictwo
KUL [Lublin Catholic University Press] 2008, 93-113.
_____. "On the Origins of the Berkeleian Definition of ‘Existence’."
Studies in Logic, Grammar, and Rethoric 15 (2009): 145-159.
Taranto, Domenico. “Berkeley critico di Mandeville. Note su etica ed
epistemologia nella polemica con i freethinkers.”
Pensiero politico
14 (1981): 243-61.
Taylor, C. C. W. “Berkeley’s Theory of Abstract Ideas.” Philosophical
Quarterly 28 (1978): 97-115.
Tennant, R. C. “The Anglican Response to Locke’s Theory of Personal
Identity.” Journal of the History of Ideas 43 (1982): 73-90.
Thaliath, Babu. Der prozeß der geometrisch-optischen Perspektivierung
in der visuellen Raumwahrnehmung. Freiburg: Universität Freiburg,
2001.
Thomas, Andrew. “God,
vision and power.”
Studia Theologica - Nordic Journal of Theology
62 (2008): 80-97.
Thomas, George H. “Berkeley’s God Does Not Perceive.” Journal of the
History of Philosophy 14 (1976): 163-68.
_____, ed., “George Berkeley, Philosophical Commentaries;
Explanatory Notes by A. A. Luce.” Alliance, Ohio: Mount Union College,
1976.
Thrane, Gary. “Berkeley’s Proper Objects of Vision.” Journal of the
History of Ideas 38 (1977): 243-60.
Tipton, Ian. “‘Ideas’ in Berkeley and Arnauld.” History of European
Ideas 7 (1986): 575-84.
_____. “Berkeley’s Imagination.” In Sosa (1987), 85-102.
_____. “Descartes’ Demon and Berkeley’s World.” Philosophical
Investigations 15 (1992): 111-30.
Torode, Brian. “A Berkeleian Correction.” Berkeley Newsletter 4
(1980): 15.
Trapnell, W. H. The Treatment of Christian Doctrine by Philosophers
of the Natural Light from Descartes to Berkeley. Oxford: Blackwell,
1988.
Tricaud, François. “L’immaterialisme est-il réfutable?”
History of European Ideas
7 (1986): 591-96.
Triepke, Sandra.
Berkeleys Immaterialismus: In Bezugnahme auf sein Hauptwerk “Prinzipien
über die Menschliche Erkenntnis.”
Norderstedt Germany: Grin (2009).
Tsai, Denis Hsin-An. “God
and the Problems of Evil in Berkeley.” Philosophical Review 6
(1983): 125-36.
Turbayne, Colin M. “Grosseteste and an Ancient Optical Principle”,
Isis 50 (1959): 467-72.
_____, ed., Berkeley. Critical and interpretive essays.
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982.
_____. “Hume’s Influence on Berkeley.” Revue internationale de
philosophie 154 (1985): 259-69.
_____. Metaphors for the Mind. The Creative Mind and its Origin.
Columbia, South Carolina: University of South Carolina Press, 1991.
Tweyman, Stanley. “Berkeley’s Denial of the Denial of Blind Agency: a
Reply to Kenneth P. Winkler.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 145-51.
Tymieniecka, Anna-Teresa. “Husserl’s Berkeley.” Soul and Body in
Phenomenology (1983): 353-63.
Umbaugh, Bruce. On Berkeley. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Thomson
Learning, 2000.
Urmson, J. O. Berkeley.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.
_____. “Berkeley’s Philosophy of Science in the Siris.”
History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 562-66.
_____. “Berkeley on Beauty.” In Berman (1993), 179-84.
Vermeulen, Ben. “Berkeley and Nieuwentijt on infinitesimals.”
Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 1-5.
Vesey, Godfrey, ed., Berkeley: Reason and Experience. London:
Open University Press, 1982.
Vernon, David. “Review of Robert Schwartz, Vision: Variations on Some
Berkeleian Themes.”
Berkeley Newsletter
13 (1993/94) : 9-14.
Vienne, Jean-Marie. “Les rapports entre raison et foi a la lumière de la
vision.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger
(1997): 45-58.
_____.“La substance, de Descartes à Berkeley. ” In Brykman (1997),
149-63.
Vienne, Jean-Michel. “Suggestion, habitude et jugement: la part cachée
de la Théorie de la vision de Berkeley.” In Berlioz (2003), 79-102.
_____. “Notions métaphysiques, notions physiques.” In Charles (2004).
Vincente Burgoa, Lorenzo. “Critica de las ideas abstractas: la
abstraccion como simple semantica.” Revista de
Filosofia
(Daimon) 12 (1996): 49-60.
Wahl, Russell and Westphal, Jonathan. “Descartes, Leibniz and Berkeley
on Whether We Can Dream Marks on the Waking State.” Studia
Leibnitiana 24 (1992): 177-81.
Waldenfels, B. “Esse est percipi. Studies on George Berkeley’s
Philosophy.” Philosophische Rundschau 49 (2002): 271-72.
Walker, Ralph Charles Sutherland. The Real in the Ideal: Berkeley’s
Relation to Kant. New York: Garland, 1989.
Walmsley, Peter. The Rhetoric of Berkeley’s Philosophy.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Ward, Ian D. S. “George Berkeley: Precursor of Keynes or Moral Economist
on Underdevelopment?.” Journal of Political Economy 67 (1959):
31-40.
_____. “George Berkeley as an Economist: Reply.” Journal of Political
Economy 68 (1960): 307-10.
Warnock, Geoffrey J. Berkeley. Oxford: Blackwell, 1982.
_____. “On Passive Obedience.” History of European Ideas 7
(1986): 555-62.
Watson, Richard A. “Berkeley Is Pronounced Barclay.” Berkeley
Newsletter 13 (1993/94): 1-3.
Waxman, Wayne. Kant and the Empiricists: Understanding Understanding.
Oxford University Press, 2005.
_____. "Kant's Debt to the British Empiricists." In Bird (2006), 93-107.
Weinberg, Julius R. Abstraction, Relation, and Induction: Three
Essays in the History of Thought. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press,
1965.
Weldon, Susan. “Direct Realism and Visual Distortion: A Development of
Arguments from Thomas Reid.” Journal of the History of Philosophy
20 (1982): 355-68.
Wenz, Peter. “Berkeley’s Christian Neo-Platonism.” Journal of the
History of Ideas 37 (1976): 537-46.
_____. “The Books in Berkeley’s Closet.” Hermathena 128 (1980):
33-40.
_____. “Berkeley and Kant on the Analytic and Synthetic a priori.”
Berkeley Newsletter 5 (1981): 1-5.
_____. “Berkeley’s Two Concepts of Impossibility: a Reply to McKim”,
Journal of the History of Ideas 43 (1982): 673-80.
Whiteside, Lesley, and Whiteside, Andrew. Where Swift and Berkeley
Learnt: A History of Kilkenny College. Dublin: Columba Press, 2009.
Wilke, Andrea-Ursula. Philosophie und Stil: eine Verhältnisbestimmung
dargestellt an Berkeley, Kant und Wittgenstein. Göttingen: V&R
Unipress, 2006.
Williamson, Timothy. “Review of Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentennial
Celebration, edited by John Foster and Howard Robinson.” Berkeley
Newsletter 10 (1987/88): 5-7.
Williford, Kenneth. “Berkeley’s Theory of Operative Language in the
Manuscript Introduction”, British Journal for the History of
Philosophy 11 (2003): 271-301.
________, and Jakapi, Roomet. “Berkeley's Theory of Meaning in
Alciphron VII.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy,
17 (2009): 99 – 118.
Wilson, Catherine. “On Imlay’s ‘Berkeley and Action’.” In Muehlmann
(1995), 183-96.
Wilson, Fred. “Berkeley’s Metaphysics and Ramist Logic.” In Easton
(1997).
Wilson, Margaret Dauler. “The ‘Phenomenalisms’ of Berkeley and Kant.” in
Self and Nature in Kant’s Philosophy, edited by A. W. Wood.
Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1984, 157-73.
_____. “Berkeley on the Mind-Dependence of Colors.” Pacific
Philosophical Quarterly 68 (1987): 249-64.
_____. “The Phenomenalisms of Leibniz and Berkeley.” In Sosa (1987),
3-22.
_____. Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy.
Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1999.
_____.
Kant and "The Dogmatic Idealism of Berkeley".
The Johns Hopkins University Press (2008).
Winkler, Kenneth P., ed. George
Berkeley, A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge.”
Hackett Publishing House, 1982.
_____. “The Authorship of Guardian 69.” Berkeley Newsletter
7 (1984): 1-6.
_____. “Unperceived Objects and Berkeley’s Denial of Blind Agency
[Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 20.
_____. “Unperceived Objects and Berkeley’s Denial of Blind Agency.”
Hermathena 139 (1985): 81-100.
_____. “Berkeley on Abstract Ideas.” Archiv für Geschichte der
Philosophie 65 (1985): 63-80.
_____. “Berkeley, Newton and the Stars.” Studies in Philosophy and
the History of Philosophy 17 (1986): 23-42.
_____. Berkeley: An Interpretation.
Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.
_____, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley.Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2005.
_____. “Berkeley and the Doctrine of Signs.” In Winkler (2005), 125-65.
Wintzer, Heinrich. George Berkeley: vernachlässigte Ressourcen des
logischen Positivismus. Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1998.
Wisdom, J. O. “Berkeley’s Criticism of the Infinitesimal.” British
Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 4 (1953): 22-25.
Woolhouse, R. S. “Berkeley and ‘A Famous Man of Modern Times’.”
Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 5-8.
Woozley, A. D. “Berkeley on Action.” Philosophy 60 (1985):
293-307.
_____. “Berkeley’s Doctrine of Notions and Theory of Meaning.”
Journal of the History of Philosophy 14 (1976): 427-34.
Yoel, Hoffmann. “’Dream-World’ Philosophers: Berkeley and Vasubandhu.”
Philosophy East-Philosophy West (1978): 247-68.
Yolton, John W. “Ideas and Knowledge in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy.”
Journal of the History of Philosophy 13 (1975): 145-65.
_____. Perceptual Acquaintance from Descartes to Reid. Oxford,
Blackwell, 1984.
_____. Thinking Matter. Materialism in Eighteenth-Century Britain.
Oxford: Blackwell, 1984.
_____, ed., Philosophy, Religion and Science in the Seventeenth and
Eighteenth Centuries. Rochester, New York: University of Rochester
Press, 1990.
_____. “The Term ‘Idea’ in Seventeenth and Eighteenth- Century British
Philosophy.”
In Idea, edited
by Marta Fattori and Massimo Luigi Bianchi. Roma: Edizioni dell’Ateneo,
1990, 237-54.
Young, Theodore A. Completing Berkeley’s Project: Classical vs.
Modern Philosophy. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America, 1985.
Zakatistovs, Atis. “Berkeley a-t-il anticipé le problème de
l’induction?.” In Charles (2004), 23-36.
|
