|
Abad, Juan Vázques,
“Observaciones sobre la noción de causa en el opusculo sobre el
movimiento de Berkeley,”
Analisis Filosofico
6 (1986), 35-44.
Abelove, H., “George Berkeley’s attitude to John Wesley: the evidence of
a lost letter,” Harvard Theological Review 70 (1977), 175-76.
Adamczykowa, Izabella, “The role of the subject in the cognitive process
after George Berkeley: passive for active subject?,” Annales
Universitatis Mariae Curie Sklodowska, Sectio 1 Philosophia-Sociologia
6 (1981), 43-57.
Agassi, Joseph, “The future of Berkeley’s instrumentalism,”
International Studies in Philosophy 7 (1975), 167-178.
Airaksinen, Timo, “Berkeley and the justification of beliefs
[Abstract],” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985), 9.
Airaksinen, Timo, “Berkeley and the justification of beliefs,”
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48 (1987), 235-256.
Alfonso, Louis, E., “The Notes on the government and population of
the Kingdom of Naples and Berkeley’s probable route to Sicily,”
Berkeley Newsletter 11 (1989/90), 20-27.
Allaire, Edwin B., “Berkeley’s idealism: yet another visit,” in
Muehlmann (1995), 23-38.
Ameeri, Javed Iqbal, “Factors and main trends in early British
empiricism. An overview,” Journal of European Studies 8 (1992),
78-93.
Anapolitanos, D. A. , “The continuous and the discrete: Leibniz versus
Berkeley and Locke,” Philosophical Inquiry 13 (1991), 1-24.
Ariotti, Piero, “Benedetto Castelli and George Berkeley as anticipators
of recent findings on the moon illusion,” Journal of the History of
the Behavioral Sciences 9 (1973), 328-332.
Armogathe, Jean-Robert, “Proofs of the existence of God,”, in Garber
(1998), 305-330.
Armstrong, D. M., “The heart of Berkeley’s metaphysics. A reply to
Ernest Sosa,” Hermathena 139 (1985), 162-164.
Arsi’c, Branka, The passive eye: gaze and subjectivity in
Berkeley (via Beckett), (Stanford, Cal.: Stanford University Press,
2003).
Asfour, Amal and Williamson, Paul, “Splendid impositions: Gainsborough,
Berkeley, Hume,” Eighteenth-Century Studies 31 (1998), 403-432.
Asher, W. O., “Berkeley on absolute motion,” History of Philosophy
Quarterly 4 (1987), 447-466.
Atherton, Margaret, “The coherence of Berkeley’s theory of mind,”
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 43 (1983), 389-400.
Atherton, Margaret, Berkeley’s revolution in vision (Ithaca:
Cornell University Press, 1990).
Atherton, Margaret, “Corpuscles, mechanism, and essentialism in Berkeley
and Locke,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1991),
47-67.
Atherton, Margaret, “Berkeley without God,” in Muehlmann (1995),
231-248.
Atherton, Margaret, “Lady Mary Shepherd’s case against George Berkeley,”
British Journal for the History of Philosophy 4 (1996), 347-366.
Atherton, Margaret, “How to write the history of vision: understanding
the relationship between Berkeley and Descartes,” in Levin (1997).
Atherton, Margaret, “How to write the history of vision: understanding
the relationship between Berkeley and Descartes”, in Levin (1997).
Atherton, Margaret, The empiricists: critical essays on Locke,
Berkeley, and Hume (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999).
Atherton, Margaret, “Apprendre à voir: les enseignements de la
Défense de la Théorie de la vision,” in Berlioz (2003), 135-157.
Atherton, Margaret, “Comment Berkeley parvient à maintenir que la neige
est blanche,” in Charles (2004), 127-144.
Ayers, Michael and Garber, Daniel, “Theories of knowledge and belief,”
in Garber (1998), 1003-1061.
Ayers, Michael and Garber, Daniel, “Ideas and objective being,” in
Garber (1998), 1062-1107.
Ayers, M. R., “Berkeley’s immaterialism and Kant’s transcendental
idealism,” Idealism Past and Present (1982), 51-69.
Ayers, M. R., “Berkeley and the meaning of existence,” History of
European Ideas 7 (1986), 567-574.
Baber, H. E., “Berkeley and the tattletale paradox,” Idealistic
Studies 19 (1989), 79-82.
Baier, Annette, “The intentionality of intentions,” Review of
Metaphysics 30 (1977), 389-414.
Baladi, Naguib, “Plotin et
l’immatérialisme de Berkeley: témoignage de la Siris,” in
Plotino e il neoplatonismo in Oriente e in Occidente (Roma:
Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, 1974), 597-604.
Barber, Kenneth F. And Gracia, Jorge J. E., eds., Individuation and
Identity in Early Modern Philosophy (Albany: SUNY Press, 1994).
Baum, Robert J., “The instrumentalist and formalist elements of
Berkeley’s philosophy of mathematics,” Studies in History and
Philosophy of Science 3 (1972), 119-134.
Baxter, Donald, “Abstraction, inseparability and identity,”
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (1997), 307-330.
Baxter, D. L. M., “Berkeley, perception and identity,” Philosophy and
Phenomenological Research 51 (1991), 85-98.
Beal, M. W., “Berkeley’s deletions,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy
6 (1976), 455-478.
Belfrage, Bertil, “A new dating of Berkeley’s Draft Introduction,”
Berkeley Newsletter 1 (1977), 10-11.
Belfrage, Bertil,
“Notes by Berkeley on moral philosophy,”
Berkeley Newsletter
2 (1978), 4-7.
Belfrage, Bertil, “Review of Berkeley, Philosophical commentaries.
Edited by George Thomas,” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978), 10.
Belfrage, Bertil, “Review of George Pitcher, Berkeley,”
Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978), 10.
Belfrage, Bertil, “A summary of Berkeley’s metaphysics in a hitherto
unpublished Berkeleian manuscript,” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979),
1-4.
Belfrage, Bertil, “Review of Berkeley, Philosophisches Tagebuch.
Translated by Wolfgang Breidert,” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979),
17-19.
Belfrage, Bertil, “Review of Edwin S. Gaustad, George Berkeley in
America,” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980), 16-17.
Belfrage, Bertil, “Corrigenda to ‘A summary of Berkeley’s metaphysics’,”
Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980), 19.
Belfrage, Bertil, “Review of Berkeley, Drei Dialogen zwischen Hulas
und Philonous.
Introduced by Wolfgang Breidert,” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980),
17.
Belfrage, Bertil, “The Newport extract of Berkeley’s Passive
Obedience,”
Berkeley Newsletter
5 (1981), 6-9.
Belfrage, Bertil, “An obscure supplement to volume one of Berkeley’s
Works,” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83), 17-21.
Belfrage, Bertil, “Dating Berkeley’s Notebook B,” Berkeley Newsletter
7 (1984), 7-13.
Belfrage, Bertil, “Facts concerning Berkeley’s Notebooks,” Berkeley
Newsletter 7 (1984), 17-22.
Belfrage, Bertil, “Strata in Berkeley’s Notebooks [Abstract],”
Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985), 10-11.
Belfrage, Bertil, “The clash on semantics in Berkeley’s Notebook A,”
Hermathena 139 (1985), 117-26.
Belfrage, Bertil, “The order and dating of Berkeley’s Notebooks,”
Revue internationale de philosophie
154 (1985), 196-214.
Belfrage, Bertil, “Berkeley’s theory of emotive meaning (1708),”
History of European Ideas 7 (1986), 643-649.
Belfrage, Bertil, “Development of Berkeley’s early theory of meaning,”
Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger
(1986), 319-330.
Belfrage, Bertil, “Une nouvelle édition de Berkeley,” Revue
philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986), 367-372.
Belfrage, Bertil, ed., George Berkeley’s Manuscript Introduction. An
editio diplomatica transcribed and edited with introduction and
commentary (Oxford:
Doxa, 1987).
Belfrage, Bertil, “A response to M. A. Stewart’s ‘Berkeley’s
Introduction Draft’,” Berkeley Newsletter 12 (1991/92), 1-10.
Belfrage, Bertil, “The constructivism of Berkeley’s New Theory of
Vision,” in Cummins and Zoeller (1992), 167-186.
Belfrage, Bertil, “Berkeley,” in Yolton, J. W., Price, J. V., Stephens,
J., eds., The Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century British Philosophers
(Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1999), 84-90.
Belfrage, Bertil, “Vers une nouvelle interprétation de la Théorie de la
vision de Berkeley,” in Berlioz (2003), 159-211.
Bellemare, Pierre and Raynor, David, “Berkeley’s letters to le Clerc
(1711),” Hermathena 146 (1989), 7-23.
Benítez, Laura, “El espíritu
como principio activo en Berkeley,”
Analisis
Filosofico 6 (1986), 23-34.
Bennett, Jonathan, “On translating Locke, Berkeley and Hume into
English,” Teaching Philosophy 17 (1994), 261-269.
Bennett, Jonathan, Learning from six philosophers: Descartes,
Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume (Oxford: Clarendon Press,
2001).
Benschop, Hans Peter, Berkeley on method and metaphysics, Ph. D.
dissertation (University of Leiden, 1992).
Benschop, Hans Peter, “Berkeley, Lee and abstract ideas,” British
Journal for the History of Philosophy 5 (1997), 55-66.
Benson, Charles, “Prior’s authentic narrative,”
Berkeley Newsletter
3 (1979), 14-15.
Ben-Zeev, A., “Reexamining Berkeley’s notion of suggestion,”
Conceptus
23 (1989), 21-30.
Berlioz, Dominique,
“G. Berkeley: ‘Of Infinites’,”
Revue philosophique
(1982), 45-57.
Berlioz, Dominique,
“ ‘To stand for’ et ‘to represent’ dans l’Introduction manuscrite de
Berkeley,”
Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger
(1986), 331-338.
Berlioz, Dominique, Berkeley. Un nominalisme réaliste (Paris: J.
Vrin, 2000).
Berlioz, Dominique, “Vision et géométrie chez Berkeley,” in Charles
(2004), 145-161.
Berman, David, “Berkeley’s letter to H. Clarke,” Berkeley Newsletter
1 (1977), 9.
Berman, David, “Mrs. Berkeley’s annotations in her interleaved copies of
An Account of the Life of Berkeley (1776),” Hermathena
(1977), 15-28.
Berman, David, “A new Berkeley portrait,” Berkeley Newsletter 2
(1978), 8-9.
Berman, David, “A note on Berkeley and his Catholic countrymen,” Long
Room 16-17 (1978), 26-28.
Berman, David, “Berkeley’s letter to Lord Orrey,” Berkeley Newsletter
3 (1979), 12-13.
Berman, David, “Berkeley’s departure for America: a new letter.”
Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980), 14.
Berman, David, “Berkeley’s philosophical reception after America,”
Archiv fûr Geschichte der Philosophie
62 (1980), 311-320.
Berman, David, “Bishop Berkeley and the fountains of living waters,”
Hermathena 128 (1980), 21-31.
Berman, David, Cognitive theology and emotive mysteries in Berkeley’s
Alciphron,” Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy (1981),
219-229.
Berman, David, “Did Berkeley write Guardian 130?,” Berkeley
Newsletter 5 (1981), 10-13.
Berman, David and Berman, Jill. “The fountains portraits of Bishop
Berkeley,” Apollo (1982), 76-79.
Berman, David, “Beckett and Berkeley,” Irish University Review
(1984), 42-45.
Berman, David, “Review of The Guardian, edited by John Calhoun
Stephens,” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984), 23-26.
Berman, David, “Berkeley and the moon illusion,”
Revue internationale de philosophie
154 (1985), 215-222.
Berman, David, “George Berkeley: pictures by Goldsmith, Yeats and Luce,”
Hermathena 139 (1985), 9-23.
Berman, David, “Berkeley’s semantic revolution: 19 November 1707 — 11
January 1708,” History of European Ideas 7 (1986), 603-608.
Berman, David, “Berkeley’s Siris and the ‘whiskey patriots’,”
Eighteenth-Century Ireland, 1, (1986), 200-203.
Berman, David, “The Jacobitism of Berkeley’s Passive Obedience,”
Journal of the History of Ideas 47 (1986), 309-319.
Berman, David, ed., George Berkeley. Eighteenth-century responses,
2 vols. (New York-London: Garland, 1989), in Pitcher (1988-1989).
Berman, David, ed., George Berkeley, Alciphron, or the minute
philosopher: in focus (London; New York: Routledge, 1993).
Berman, David, George Berkeley: idealism and the man (Oxford:
Clarendon Press, 1994).
Bermudez, Jose Luis, “The adequacy of simple ideas in Locke . A
rehabilitation of Berkeley’s criticisms,”
Locke Newsletter
23, 347-354.
Bernabei, Andrea,
“Il ‘cieco di Molyneux’: un problema di percezione visiva nella Francia
illuminista,” Rivista critica di storia della filosofia 30
(1975), 132-166.
Bertini, Daniele, (ed.), George Berkeley, Saggio su una nuova teoria
della visione-Trattato sui principi della conoscenza umana, (Milano:
R.C.S., 2004);
Bertini, Daniele, (ed.), George Berkeley, Alcifrone, (Milano:
R.C.S., 2005);
Beyhl, Helmut, Bischof Berkeley, der Mann, der den gesunden
Menschenverstand tanzen lässt: das ‘Problem’ des Beweises der Realität
der Außenwelt (Berlin: Freie Universität Dissertation, 1990).
Beyssade, Jean-Marie, “L’expérience du rêve et l’extétiorité (de
Descartes à Berkeley),” Revue philosophique de la France et de
l’étranger, 111 (1986), 355-366.
Beyssade, Jean-Marie, “Philosophie et apologétique chez Berkeley,”
Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986), 377-384.
Blackith, Robert, “A Berkeleian time-warp,” Berkeley Newsletter
10 (1987/88), 1-4.
Blake, J. B., “Addenda to Keynes: a bibliography of Berkeley,”
Bibliographical Society of America Papers 73 (1979), 337-340.
Bonk, Sigmund, Immaterialismus: Darstellung und Verteidigung von
George Berkeleys Gottesbeweis und immaterialistischem Weltbild
(München, 1990).
Bonk, Sigmund, “George Berkeleys Gottesbeweis,” Neue Zeitschrift für
systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 36 (1994), 268-283.
Bonk, Sigmund, “George Berkeleys Nachweis einer gottlichen Vorsehung,”
Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie
39 (1997), 176-190.
Bonk, Sigmund, “George Berkeley’s theory of time: ‘A-total-disaster’,”
Studia Leibnitiana 29 (1997), 198-210.
Bonk, Sigmund, “We see God”: George Berkeley’s philosophical theology
(Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1997).
Bonk, Sigmund, Abschied von der Anima mundi: die britische
Philosophie im Vorfeld der industriellen Revolution (Freiburg,
Breisgau: Alber, 1999).
Borges, Jorge Luis,
“Berkeley’s Crossroads,” Berkeley Newsletter 14 (1995/96), 5-12.
Bozovic, Miran, Der grosse Andere: Gotteskonzepte in der Philosophie
der Neuzeit (Wien: Turia und Kant, 1993).
Bracken, Harry M., “Berkeley: Irish Cartesian,” Philosophical Studies
24 (1976), 39-51.
Bracken, Harry M., “Bayle, Berkeley, and Hume,” Eighteenth-Century
Studies 11 (1977), 227-245.
Bracken, Harry M., “Realism and Greek philosophy: what Berkeley saw and
Burnyeat missed [Abstract],” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985), 10.
Bracken, Harry M., “Realism and Greek philosophy: what Berkeley saw and
Burnyeat missed,” Hermathena 139 (1985), 63-80.
Bracken, Harry M., “On some points in Bayle, Berkeley, and Hume,”
History of Philosophy Quarterly 4 (1987), 435-446.
Bradatan, Costica, “Berkeley and Liber Mundi," Minerva. An Internet
Journal of Philosophy 3 (1999), University of Limerick, Ireland.
Bradatan, Costica, “Waiting for the eschaton: Berkeley’s ‘Bermuda
scheme’ between Earthly Paradise and educational utopia”, Utopian
Studies 14 (2003), 36-50.
Bradatan, Costica, "Philosophy as Palimpsest. In Search for an
Immemorial Wisdom," Existentia. An International Journal of
Philosophy 14
(2004), 337-344.
Bradatan, Costica, ”'God is Dreaming You': Narrative as Imitatio Dei in
Miguel de Unamuno, " Janus Head - A Journal of Interdisciplinary
Studies in Continental Philosophy, Literature, Phenomenological
Psychology and the Arts, 7 (2004), 453-46.
Bradatan, Costica, “Review: Branka Arsic, The Passive Eye: Gaze and
Subjectivity in Berkeley (via Beckett,)” Philosophy 24, (2004),
237-239.
Bradatan, Costica, "'One is All, and All is One.' The Great Chain of
Being in Berkeley's Siris" in O'Gorman, Frank and Donald, Diana (eds.),
Ordering the World in the Eighteenth Century, (Palgrave
Macmillan, 2005), 63-82.
Bradatan, Costica, "George Berkeley's 'Universal Language of Nature'" in
Klaas van Berkel, Klaas and Vanderjagt, Arjo (eds.), The Book of
Nature in Modern Times (Leuven: Peeters Publishers, 2005), 71-84.
Bradatan, Costica, “Introduction”, in Berkeley, Treatise Concerning
the Principles of Human Knowledge (Barnes & Noble Books, 2006).
Bradshaw, D. E., “Berkeley and Hume on abstraction and generalization,”
History of Philosophy Quarterly 5 (1988), 11-22.
Brandt, Reinhard, “Historical observations on the genesis of the
three-dimensional optical picture,”
Ratio
17 (1975), 176-190.
Breidert, Wolfgang, “Corrigendum,” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978),
13.
Breidert, Wolfgang, “Einleitung” in Berkeley, Drei Dialoge
(Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1980).
Breidert, Wolfgang, “Die Rezeption Berkeleys in Deutschland im 18
Jahrhundert,”
Revue internationale de philosophie
154 (1985), 223-241.
Breidert, Wolfgang, “George Berkeley (1685-1753),” Fridericana
Zeitschrift der Universität Karlsruhe 36 (1985), 3-13.
Breidert, Wolfgang, “On some marginal signs in the Philosophical
Commentaries,”
Berkeley Newsletter
8 (1985), 7-8.
Breidert, Wolfgang,
“With the infinite God against the mathematics of infinity [Abstract],”
Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985), 11-12.
Breidert, Wolfgang, “Berkeley’s De Ludo Algebraico and Notebook
B.” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986), 12-14.
Breidert, Wolfgang, “Berkeley’s Kritik an der Infinitesimalrechnung,”
Studia Leibnitiana 14 (1986), 185-191.
Breidert, Wolfgang, “On the early reception of Berkeley in Germany”, in
Sosa (1987), 231-241.
Breidert, Wolfgang, ed., George Berkeley, Versuch über eine Theorie
des Sehens und Die Theorie des Sehens ... verteidigt und erklär,
(Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1987).
Breidert, Wolfgang, “Review: Essays on Berkeley, ed. John Foster and
Howard Robinson”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 69
(1987), 315-321.
Breidert, Wolfgang, “Schopenhauer und Berkeley,”
Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch 69 (1988), 373-385.
Breidert, Wolfgang, George Berkeley 1685-1753 (Basel: Birkhauser,
1989).
Breidert, Wolfgang, "Berkeley, George", in Lexikon für Theologie und
Kirche, vol. 2, 1994, col. 260.
Breidert, Wolfgang, George Berkeley, Alciphron oder der Kleine
Philosoph, Übers. v. Luise und Friedrich Raab. Mit einer Einleitung
versehen und herausgegeben von Wolfgang Breidert, (Hamburg: Felix
Meiner, 1996).
Breidert, Wolfgang, “Berkeley's sources in mathematics”, in Brykman
(1997), 49-58.
Breidert, Wolfgang, “George Berkeley. Philosophie des Immaterialismus”,
in Kreimendahl, Lothar (ed.), Philosophen des 18. Jahrhunderts,
(Darmstadt, 2000), 68-86.
Breidert, Wolfgang, “Berkeley's defence of infinite God in the contrast
to the infinite in mathematics”, in Koetsier, Teun and Bergmans, Luc
(eds.), Mathematics and the divine. A historical study (Amsterdam
etc.: Elsevier, 2005), 499-508.
Breuninger, Scott Christopher, Morals, the market, and history:
George Berkeley and social virtue in early eighteenth-century thought,
Dissertation (University of Wisconsin: Madison 2002).
Brolley, Kevin G., “Review of Berkeley by J. O. Urmson,”
Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83), 22-23.
Brook, Richard, “Berkeley, causality and signification,”
International Studies in Philosophy 27 (1995), 15-31.
Brown, Stuart, “Leibniz on Berkeley [Abstract],”
Berkeley Newsletter
8 (1985), 13-14.
Brown, Stuart, “Platonic idealism in modern philosophy from Malebranche
to Berkeley,” in Cambridge Platonists in philosophical context
(Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Pub., 1997), 197-214.
Brykman, Geneviève, “Berkeley: sa lecture de Malebranche à travers le
Dictionaire de Bayle,” Revue internationale de philosophie 29
(1975), 496-514.
Brykman, Geneviève, “Berkeley, lecteur et critique de Spinoza,”
Recherches sur le XVIIème Siècle 2 (1978), 173-192.
Brykman, Geneviève, “Le cartésianisme dans le De Motu,” Revue
internationale de philosophie 3 (1979), 553-569.
Brykman, Geneviève, “The close inspection of words and ideas in
Berkeley’s writings,”
Berkeley Newsletter
3 (1979), 9-10.
Brykman, Geneviève, “Abstracts of ‘Le Cartesianisme dans le De Motu’
and ‘Pouvoir d’abstraire et notions abstraites chez Berkeley,”
Berkeley Newsletter
4 (1980), 15.
Brykman, Geneviève,
“Pouvoir d’abstraire et notions abstraites chez Berkeley,” Recherches
sur le XVIIème siècle 4 (1980), 157-166.
Brykman, Geneviève, “Berkeley à Newport: 1729-1779,”
Recherches sur le XVIIème Siècle
4 (1980), 167-169.
Brykman, Geneviève, “Berkeley et l’interieur absolu des choses,”
Revue philosophique (1980), 421-432.
Brykman, Geneviève, “Philosophy and apologetics in Berkeley,”
Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83), 12-16.
Brykman, Geneviève, “Le modèle visuel de la connaissance chez Berkeley,”
Revue philosophique (1983), 427-441.
Brykman, Geneviève, Berkeley : philosophie et apologétique, 2
vols. (Lille : Atelier National de reproduction des thèses ; Paris :
Vrin, 1984).
Brykman, Geneviève, “Pleasure and pain versus ideas in Berkeley
[Abstract],” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985), 12-13.
Brykman, Geneviève, “Pleasure and pain versus ideas in Berkeley,”
Hermathena 139 (1985), 127-137.
Brykman, Geneviève, “Principe de ressemblance et hétérogénéité des idées
chez Berkeley,” Revue internationale de philosophie 154 (1985),
242-251.
Brykman, Geneviève, “L’esprit et les idées visuelles dans la Nouvelle
théorie de la vision,”
History of European Ideas
7 (1986), 585-591.
Brykman, Geneviève, “Tricentenaire ‘Berkeley’ (1685-1985),” Revue de
synthèse 109 (1988), 148-150.
Brykman, Geneviève, “Sensibles communs et sens commun chez Locke et
Berkeley,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale (1991), 515-529.
Brykman, Geneviève, “Review of Berkeley, De Motu, translated into
Italian with an introduction by Mariapaola Fimiani,”
Berkeley Newsletter
12 (1991/92), 17.
Brykman, Geneviève, Berkeley et le voile des mots (Paris: Vrin,
1993).
Brykman, Geneviève, “Vision, connaissance et ontologie chez Berkeley”,
in Monti (1995), 121-137.
Brykman, Geneviève, ed., Berkeley et le cartésianisme (Nanterre:
Université Paris X, Nanterre, 1997).
Brykman, Geneviève, “L’hétérogénéité des idées sensibles et le ‘langage
de la Nature’ chez Locke et Berkeley,” in Berlioz (2003), 17-46.
Bunnin, N. F., The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy (Oxford:
Blackwell, 1996).
Burnyeat, M. F., “Idealism and Greek philosophy: what Descartes saw and
Berkeley missed,” Idealism Past and Present (1982), 19-50.
Bustamante, Rodrigo., “La
critica de Berkeley al infinito categorico,” Contrafuerte (1985),
28-34.
Byrne, P. A., “Berkeley, scientific realism and creation,” Religious
Studies 20 (1984), 453-464.
Caffentzis, George Constantine, Über die Ursachen von “The Querist”:
Vademecum zu einem irischen Klassiker der politischen Ökonomie
(Düsseldorf: Verl. Wirtschaft und Finanzen, 1999).
Caffentzis, George Constantine, Exciting the industry of mankind:
George Berkeley’s philosophy of money (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000).
Caffentzis, George Constantine, “Medical metaphors and monetary
strategies in the political economy of Locke and Berkeley,” History
of Political Economy 35 (2003: supplement), 204-233.
Camporesi, Cristiano, “Aporie
berkeleyane,” Rivista di filosofia 73 (1982), 471-473.
Cantor, Geoffrey N., “Berkeley, Reid and the mathematization of
mid-eighteenth-century optics,” Journal of the History of Ideas
38 (1977), 429-448.
Cantor, Geoffrey N., “Two letters relating to Berkeley’s social circle,”
Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980), 1-3.
Cantor, Geoffrey N., “Berkeley’s The Analyst revisited.,” Isis
75 (1984), 668-683.
Casini, Paolo, “Newton’s Principia and the philosophers of the
Enlightenment,” Notes and records of the Royal Society of London
42 (1988), 35-52.
Cates, Lynn D., “Berkeley on the work of the six days,” Faith and
Philosophy 14 (1997), 82-86.
Chaney, Edward, The evolution of the Grand Tour since the Renaissance
(London: Franck Cass, 1998).
Charles, Sébastien, “L’abbé Raynal, author of an unnoticed review of
Berkeley’s Dialogues,” Berkeley Newsletter 15 (1997/98),
14-18.
Charles, Sébastien, “The Siris in the Age of Enlightenment:
panacea or imposture?,” Hermathena 168 (2000), 55-69.
Charles, Sébastien, “Hume and Berkeley in the Prussian Academy: Louis
Frederic Ancillon’s ‘Dialogue between Berkeley and Hume’ of 1796,”,
Hume Studies 27 (2001), 85-97.
Charles, Sébastien, “Ocasionalismo y modernidad: berkeley, lector
critico de Malebranche,” Praxis Filosofica 13 (2001), 27-42.
Charles, Sébastien, “Existence et temporalité au Siècle des Lumières:
Turgot lecteur de Maupertuis et Berkeley,” Lumen 21 (2002),
45-59.
Charles, Sébastien, Berkeley au siècle des lumières: immatérialisme
et scepticisme au XVIIIe siècle (Paris: J. Vrin, 2003).
Charles, Sébastien, “Berkeley occasionaliste malgré lui? De la causalité
et de la volonté chez Malebranche et Berkeley,” in Charles (2004),
73-88.
Charles, Sébastien, ed., Science et épistémologie selon Berkeley
(Saint-Nicolas, Québec: Les Presses l’Université Laval, 2004).
Chinn, Ewing Y., “The anti-abstractionism of Dignana and Berkeley,”
Philosophy East and West 44 (1994), 55-77.
Chiurazzi, G., “Il problema della mediazione nella filosofia di George
Berkeley”, Filosofia 49 (1998), 53-75.
Clark, Stephen R. L., Money, obedience, and affection: essays on
Berkeley’s moral and political thought (New York: Garland, 1989).
Clasen, Uwe, Die Sehtheorien von René Descartes und George Berkeley
im Spiegel der Geschichte der physiologischen Optik (Aachen: Tecn.
Hochsch. Diss., 1997).
Collingridge, D. G,. “Berkeley on space, sight and touch.” Philosophy
53 (1978), 102-105.
Conroy, Graham P., “George Berkeley and the Jacobite heresy: some
comments on Irish Augustan politics,” Albion 3 (1971), 82.
Cope, Kevin L., “Moral travel and the pursuit of nothing: Vathek and
Siris as philosophical monologue,” Studies in Eighteenth-Century
Culture 18 (1988), 167-186.
Cover, J. A., Central Themes in Early Modern Philosophy
(Indianapolis: Hacket, 1990).
Coxito, Amandio Augusto. “Un
texto de Luis A. Vernei contra o imaterialismo de Berkeley,” Revista
Filosofia de Coimbra 6 (1997), 101-117.
Crain, Steven D., “Must a classical theist be an immaterialist?,”
Religious Studies 33 (1997), 81-92.
Creery, Walter E., ed., George Berkeley: critical assessments, 3
vols. (London; New York: Routledge, 1991).
Crombie, Alistair C., George Berkeley bicentenary (New York:
Garland, 1988).
Cross, C. B., “Berkeley on other minds,”
Auslegung
6 (1978), 45-50.
Cummins, Philli,.
“Berkeley’s ideas of sense,”
Nous
9 (1975), 55-72.
Cummins, Phillip,
“Berkeley’s unstable ontology,” Modern Schoolman 67 (1989),
15-32.
Cummins, Phillip, “Sections nine and ten of Berkeley’s Principles,”
Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986), 1-5.
Cummins, Phillip and Zoeller, Guenter, eds. Minds, Ideas, and
Objects: Essays on the Theory of Representation in Modern Philosophy
(Atascadero, California: Ridgeview Publishing Company, 1992).
Danaher, James P., “Is Berkeley’s world a divine language?”, Modern
Theology 18 (2002), 361-373.
Dancy, Jonathan, Berkeley: An Introduction (Oxford: Blackwell,
1987).
Dancy, Jonathan, ed., George Berkeley, A Treatise Concerning the
Principles of Human Knowledge (Oxford: Oxford University Press,
1998).
Dancy, Jonathan, ed., George Berkeley, Three Dialogues between Hylas
and Philonous (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).
Daniel, Stephen H., “George Berkeley, Francis Suarez, and the
esse-existere distinction,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly
74 (2000), 621-636.
Daniel, Stephen H., “The Ramist context of Berkeley’s philosophy,”
British Journal for the History of philosophy 9 (2001), 487-505.
Daniel, Stephen H., “Edwards, Berkeley, and Ramist logic,” Idealistic
Studies 31 (2001), 55-72.
Daniel, Stephen H., “Berkeley’s pantheistic discourse,” International
Journal for Philosophy of Religion 49 (2001), 179-194.
Daniel, Stephen H., "Berkeley's Christian Neoplatonism, archetypes, and
divine ideas," Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (2001),
239-258.
Daniel, Stephen H., “Les limites de la philosophie naturelle de
Berkeley,” in Charles (2004), 163-170.
Davis, John W., “The Molyneux problem,” Journal of the History of
Ideas 21 (1960), 392-408.
Dégremont, Roselyne, Berkeley (Paris: Ellipses, 1999).
Dégremont, Roselyne, Berkeley. L’idée de nature, (Paris: Presses
universitaires de France, 1995).
De Waal, Cornelis, “The real issue between nominalism and realism:
Peirce and Berkeley reconsidered,” Transactions of the Charles S.
Peirce Society 32 (1996), 425-433.
Dicker, Georges, “Two arguments from perceptual relativity in Berkeley’s
Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous,” Southern Journal of
Philosophy 20 (1982), 409-422.
Dicker, Georges, “Berkeley on the immediate perception of objects,” in
Cummins and Zoeller (1992), 201-213.
Di Michele, Stefano, “George
Berkeley in America: nostalgia del vedere,” Annali della Facolta di
Lettere e Filosofia 39 (1996), 141-163.
Doney, Willis, “Is Berkeley’s a Cartesian mind?,” in Turbayne (1982),
273-282.
Doney, Willis, “Berkeley’s argument against abstract ideas,” Midwest
Studies in Philosophy 8 (1983), 295-308.
Dooren, W. Van, “Whether there be any reason why Berkeley is so often
misunderstood?,”
Wijsgerig perspectief op maatschappijen en wetenschap
26 (1985-6).
Downing, Lisa J., “Berkeley’s case against realism about dynamics,” in
Muehlmann (1995), 197-216.
Downing, Lisa J., “Siris and the scope of Berkeley’s
instrumentalism,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 3
(1995), 279-300.
Drebushenko, D., “Abstraction and a new argument for the Esse-is-percipi
thesis,” Hermathena 167, (1999), 35-58.
Dubois, Pierre, L’oeuvre de Berkeley (Paris: Vrin, 1985).
Dunn, John, The British empiricists (Oxford: Oxford Univeristy
Press, 1992).
Dupas, Jean-Claude, “Le visible et l’invisibile chez Berkeley,”
Études irlandaises (1986), 45-56.
Easton, Patricia A., ed.,
Logic and the Workings of the Mind
(Atascadero: Eastview, 1997).
Eaton, Jeffrey C., “Berkeley’s immaterialism and the scientific promise
of the Christian doctrine of creation,” Harvard Theological Review
80 (1987), 431-447.
Eberwein, Robert, “Samuel Johnson, George Cheyne, and the ‘cone of
being’,” Journal of the history of ideas 36 (1975), 153-158.
Echeverri Saldarriaga, Santiago, “’Subjetividad’ e ‘immaterialismo’en la
filosofia de George Berkeley,” Revista colombiana de filosofia de la
ciencia 3 (2002), 179-208; republished in Estudios de filosofia
27 (2003), 127-148.
Egan, Frances, “The moon illusion,” Philosophy of Science 65
(1998), 604-623.
Eisenstein, G., “Berkeley’s presence: metaphysical development and
dialectical tension,” Idealistic Studies 18 (1988), 207-229.
Enright, J. T., “The moon illusion examined from a new point of view,”
Proceedings of the American philosophical society 119 (1975),
87-107.
Evans, J. D. G., “Berkeley on conceiving the unconceived,” Irish
Journal of Philosophy 2 (1985), 79-93.
Everitt, Nicholas, “Quasi-Berkelyan idealism as perspicuous theism.,”
Faith and Philosophy 14 (1997), 353-377.
Falkenstein, Lorne, “Intuition and construction in Berkeley’s account of
physical space,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (1994),
63-84.
Faris, J. A., “Review of Berkele:, critical and interpretative essays
edited by C. M. Turbayne,” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984), 26-32.
Fau, Martina, Berkeleys Theorie der visuellen Sprache Gottes: ihre
Bedeutung für die Philosophie des Immaterialismus und ihre historischen
Würzeln (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1993).
Feuer, Lewis F., “Materialism, idealism and science,” Philosophy of
science 15 (1948), 71-75.
Fimiani, Mariapaola, George
Berkeley: il nome e l’immagine (Cosenza: Lerici, 1979).
Flage, Daniel E., “Berkeley’s notions,”
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
45 (1985), 407-425.
Flage, Daniel E., Berkeley’s doctrine of notions: a reconstruction
based on his theory of meaning (London: Croom Helm, 1987).
Flage, Daniel E., “Relative ideas and notions,” in Cummins and Zoeller
(1992), 235-253.
Flage, Daniel E., “Berkeley, individuation and physical objects,” in
Barber and Gracia (1994).
Fleming, N., “Berkeley and idealism,” Philosophy 60 (1985),
300-325.
Flew, Anthony, “Was Berkeley a precursor of Wittgenstein?,” in Berman
(1993), 214-226.
Fogelin, Robert, “Hume and Berkeley on the proofs of infinite
divisibility,” Philosophical Review 97 (1988), 47-69.
Fogelin, Robert, “The intuitive basis of Berkeley’s immaterialism,”
History of Philosophy Quarterly 13 (1996), 331-344.
Fogelin, Robert J., Berkeley and the Principles of Human Knowledge
(London and New York: Routledge, 2001).
Forest, Denis, “Language visuel, communication universelle,” Revue
philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 4 (1997) 429-446.
Foster, John and Robinson, Howard, eds., Essays on Berkeley :a
tercentennial celebration (Oxford : Clarendon, 1985).
Fox, Christopher, “Locke and the Scriblerians : the discussion of
identity in early eighteenth century England,” Eighteenth-Century
Studies 16 (1982), 1-25.
Frangiotti, Marco Antonio,
“Transcendental idealism and phenomenalism,” Critica 26 (1994),
73-95.
Frankel, Henry, “Berkeley’s concept of mind as presented in Book II of
the Principles,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 15 (1977),
37-51.
Frederick, R., “Berkeley and the argument from conceiving,”
Philosophy Research Archives 13 (1987/88), 481-487.
Friedman, Lesley, “Pragmatism: the unformulated method of Bishop
Berkeley,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2003), 81-96.
Furlong, E. J., “A Berkeleian nod?,” Berkeley Newsletter 2
(1978), 3.
Furlong, E. J., “Some puzzles in Berkeley’s writings,” Hermathena
120 (1976), 63-73.
Furlong, E. J. and Berman, David, “George Berkeley and The Ladies
Library,”
Berkeley Newsletter
4 (1980), 4-13.
Garber, Daniel, ed.,
The Cambridge history of seventeenth century philosophy
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
Gatti, Andrea, Inglesi a Napoli nel viceregno austriaco: Joseph
Addison, Lord Shaftesbury, George Berkeley (Napoli: Vivarium,
Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici, 2000).
Gaukroger, Stephen, ed., The Uses of Antiquity (Dordrecht:
Kluwer, 1991).
Gaustad, Edwin S., “George Berkeley and the New World community,”
Church History 48 (1979), 5-17.
Gaustad, Edwin S., George Berkeley in America (New Haven and
London: Yale University Press, 1979).
Gaustad, Edwin S., “When in the course,” William and Mary Quarterly
52 (1995), 479-482.
Gibson, Ann and Palmer, Lucia, “George Berkeley’s visual language and
the new England portrait tradition,” Centennial Review 31 (1987),
122-145.
Glauser, Richard, “Les rélations de significance chez Berkeley,”
Studia Philosophica
42 (1983), 165-200.
Glauser, Richard, Berkeley et les philosophes du XVIIe siècle:
perception et scepticisme (Sprimont: Mardaga, 1999).
Glauser, Richard, “La structure de la perception médiate dans la théorie
berkeleyenne de la vision,” in Berlioz (2003), 103-134.
Glouberman, Mark, “Abstraction and determinacy: the ideological
background of Berkeleianism,”
Idealistic Studies
(1982), 14-34.
Gloubermann, Mark,
“Berkeley’s anti-abstractionism,” British Journal of the History of
Philosophy 2 (1994), 145-163.
Glouberman, Mark, “Berkeley’s anti-abstractionism: a reply to Moked,”
Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 40 (1991), 315-318.
Glouberman, Mark, “Consciousness and cognition: from Descartes to
Berkeley,” Studia Leibnitiana 14 (1982), 244-265.
Gottenbarn, Donald, “Berkeley: God’s pain,” Philosophical Studies
28 (1975), 245-254.
Gozzano, Simone, “Mental images and their ontology,” Epistemologia
17 (1994), 225-252.
Graham, Jody, “Common sense and Berkeley’s perception by suggestion,”
International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (1997), 397-423.
Granja, Dulce Maria, “Realismo
et idealismo en Berkeley,” Contrafuerte (1985), 19-27.
Gray, J., “Berkeley’s theory of space,” Journal of the History of
Philosophy 16 (1978), 415-434.
Grayling, A. C., Berkeley: the central arguments (London:
Duckworth, 1986).
Greco, John, “Reid’s critique of Berkeley and Hume: what’s the big
idea?,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (1995),
279-296.
Greenberg, A. R., “Reid, Berkeley, and notional knowledge,”
Monist
61 (1978), 415-434.
Gruner, Rolf,
“Berkeley on general ideas,”
Dialogue
8 (1969), 481-85.
Guérnieau, Roselyne, “Berkeley et les Bermudes,” Revue philosophique
de la France et de l’étranger (1986), 309-317.
Gutiérrez, Pedro Stepanenko,
“La conception berkeleyana del yo,” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986),
13-22.
Hall, Richard A. S., “Did Berkeley influence Edwards: their common
critique of the moral sense theory”, in Jonathan Edwards’s writings
(Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996), 100-121.
Hall, Roland. “ ‘New words in Berkeley’s writings.” Berkeley
Newsletter 1 (1977), 4-8.
Hamou, Philippe, “Microscopes et minima visuels. Berkeley critique de
l’autopsie instrumentale,” in Charles (2004), 103-126.
Hamou, Philippe, “Sens et fonction de modèle linguistique dans la
Nouvelle Théorie de la vision,” in Berlioz (2003), 47-78.
Hanson, Norwood Russell, “The dematerialization of matter,”
Philosophy of science 29 (1962), 27-38.
Hanratty, Gerald, “A voice in the wilderness: Berkeley’s response to
Enlightenment,” Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und
Religionsphilosophie 32 (1990), 319-337.
Hardwick, Charles, Berkeley and Peirce, Graduate Studies Texas
Tech. University (1981), 81-85.
Harris, Stephen, “Berkeley’s argument from perceptual relativity,”
History of Philosophy Quarterly 14 (1997), 99-120.
Hatfield, Gary, “The cognitive faculties,” in Garber (1998), 953-1002.
Hausman, Alan and Hausman, David, “A new approach to Berkeley’s ideal
reality,” in Muehlmann (1995), 47-66.
Hausman, Alan and Hausman, David, “On Allaire’s ‘Another visit’,” in
Muehlmann (1995), 39-46.
Hausman, Alan and Hausman, David, “Berkeley’s semantic dilemma: beyond
the incoherence model,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 13
(1996), 221-238.
Hausman, David B., Descartes’s legacy: minds and meaning in early
modern philosophy (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997).
Hayry, Matti and Hayry, Hetta, “Obedience to rules and Berkeley’s
theological utilitarianism,” Utilitas 6 (1994), 233-242.
Henze, D. F., “Descartes vs. Berkeley: a study in early modern
metaphilosophy,” Metaphilosophy 8 (1977), 147-163.
Hestevold, H. S., “Berkeley’s theory of time,” History of Philosophy
Quarterly 7 (1990), 179-192.
Hight, Marc A. and Ott, Walter, “The new Berkeley,” Canadian Journal
of Philosophy 34 (2004), 1-24.
Hight, Marc A., “Why we do not see what we feel,” Pacific
Philosophical Quarterly 83 (2002), 148-162.
Hollingshead, G., “Bishop Berkeley and the gloomy clerk: Pope’s final
satire on deism,” Durham University Journal (1982), 19-27.
Hollingshead, G., “Berkeley, Blackwell, and Blackwell’s Homer,”
Scottish Literary Journal 11 (1984), 20-35.
Hollingshead, G., “Pope, Berkeley, and the true key to the Dunciad
in four books,” English Studies in Canada 10 (1984), 141-155.
Hollingshead, G., “The case for Berkeley’s authorship of The vanity
of philosophical Systems,” Eighteenth-Century Life 9 (1985),
51-64.
Hollingshead, G., “Sources for the Ladies’ Library,” Berkeley
Newsletter 11 (1989/90), 1-9.
Hone, Joseph M., Bishop Berkeley: his life, writings, and philosophy
(London: Faber & Faber, 1931).
Houghton, Raymond, “International Berkeley Society,” Berkeley
Newsletter 2 (1978), 14-15.
Howell, T. J., “The bond of society: Berkeley’s theory of social
reality,” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979), 16.
Hughes, M., “Hermes and Berkeley,” British Journal for the Philosophy
of Science 43 (1992), 1-19.
Hurley, Michael, “Berkeley and Methodism: a new letter,” Berkeley
Newsletter 2 (1978), 1-2.
Ibañez, Alejandro Herrera,
“La nocion de existencia en la ontologia de Berkeley,”
Analisis Filosofico
6 (1986), 13-22.
Ichinose, Masaki, “Berkeley on practical spirit,” Philosophical
Studies 14 (1995), 1-17.
Imlay, Robert A., “Berkeley and scepticism: a fatal dalliance,” Hume
Studies 18 (1992), 501-510.
Imlay, Robert, “Berkeley and action,” in Muehlmann (1995), 171-182.
Jacob, Alexander, “The Neoplatonic conception of nature in More,
Cudworth and Berkeley,” in Gaukroger (1991).
Jacquette, Dale, “Berkeley’s continuity argument for the existence of
God,” Journal of Religion 65 (1985), 1-14.
Jacquette, Dale, “Reconciling Berkeley’s microscopes in God’s infinite
mind,” Religious Studies 29 (1993), 453-463.
Jaffro, Laurent, “Sensation et imagination. Berkeley et la ‘différence
perçue’,” in Ressemblances et dissemblances dans l’empirisme
britannique, dir. G. Brykman, université Paris 10-Nanterre,
Le Temps philosophique 6 (1999), 71-91.
Jaffro, Laurent,
“La paideia selon Berkeley et Shaftesbury. Un conflit dans la conception
thérapeutique de la philosophie,” in La philosophie comme médecine de
l’âme à l’âge classique, dir. G. Brykman, université Paris
10-Nanterre, Le Temps philosophique 9 (2003), 147-173.
Jaffro, Laurent, “Le cogito de Berkeley,” Archives de philosophie,
67 (2004), 85-111.
Jakapi, Roomet, Berkeley, mysteries, and meaning: a critique of the
non-cognitivist interpretation, Dissertationes Philosophicae
Universitatis Tartuensis, 2 (Tartu: Tartu University Press,
2002).
Jakapi, Roomet, “Emotive meaning and Christian mysteries in Berkeley’s
Alciphron,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy
10 (2002), 401-411.
Jakapi, Roomet, “Faith, truth, revelation and meaning in Berkeley’s
defence of the Christian religion (in Alciphron)”, The Modern
Schoolman 80 (2002), 23-34.
Jakapi, Roomet, “Entry 720 of Berkeley’s Philosophical Commentaries
and ‘non-cognitive’ propositions in Scripture,” Archiv für Geschichte
der Philosophie 85 (2003), 86-90.
Jesseph, Douglas M., ed., George Berkeley, De Motu and The Analyst.
A modern edition with introductions and commentary (Dordrecht: Kluwer,
1992).
Jesseph, Douglas M., Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics
(Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).
Jessop, T. E., “George Berkeley and the proofs of the existence of God,”
Journal of Theological Studies 9 (1958), 197-198.
Jolley, N., “Berkeley and Malebranche on Causality and Volition,” in
Cover (1990), 227-244.
Jones, Tom, Pope and Berkeley: the language of poetry and philosophy
(Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).
Kabitoglou, E, Douka, “On the discrimination of Platonisms in eighteenth
century England.” Philosophical Inquiry 15 (1993), 20-45.
Kasam, A., “Can Berkeley be called an imagist?,” Indian Philosophical
Quarterly 6 (1989), 75-88.
Kassavine, Illia, “Berkeley revised: on the new metaphysics for social
epistemology. 90 years after Materialism and Empiriocriticism,”
Epistemologia 19 (1996), 157-174.
Kearney, John, “Thought, language and meaning in Berkeley’s philosophy,”
The New Scholasticism 49 (1975), 4804-94.
Kearney, Richard, “Berkeley and the Irish mind,”
Études irlandaises
(1986), 7-25.
Kelly, Patrick, “Ireland and the critique of mercantilism in Berkeley’s
Querist [Abstract],” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985), 14.
Kelly, Patrick, “Berkeley and money: Ireland and the critique of
mercantilism in Berkeley’s Querist,” Hermathena 139
(1985), 101-116.
Kelly, Patrick,
“Berkeley and Ireland,”
Études irlandaises
(1986), 7-25.
Kelly, Patrick,
“Berkeley’s servants,” Berkeley Newsletter 14 (1995/96), 13-14.
Keynes, Geoffrey, “Samuel Johnson and Bishop Berkeley,” The Book
Collector (1981), 177-181.
Kijaczko, Stanislaw, Immaterializm: epistemologia I metafizyka: próba
interpretacij filozofii George’a Berkeleya (Opole: Wydawn.
Uniwersytetu Opolskiego, 2002).
Kingston, F. Temple, The metaphysics of George Berkeley, 1685-1753:
Irish philosopher (Lewiston: Mellen, 1992).
Klein, Lawrence E., “Berkeley, Shaftesbury and the meaning of
politeness,” Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture 16 (1986),
57-68.
Kline, David A.,
“Berkeley’s theory of common sense,” International Studies in
Philosophy 19 (1987), 21-31.
Kline, David A., “Berkeley’s divine language argument,” in Berman
(1993), 185-199.
Kohlenberg, Philip, “Bishop Berkeley on religion and the church,“
Harvard Theoogical Review 66 (1973), 219-236.
Kopper, Joachim, Das Unbezügliche als Offenbarsein: Besinnung auf das
philosophische Denken (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004).
Kroustallis, Basileios, “Berkeley and the moon illusion”, History of
Philosophy Quarterly 21(2004), 151-166.
Kulenkampff, Arend, George Berkeley (München: Beck, 1987).
Kulenkampff, Arend, Esse est percipi.
Untersuchungen zur Philosophie George Berkeleys
(Basel: Schwabe, 2001).
Kupfer, Joseph, “Universalization in Berkeley’s rule-utilitarianism,”
Revue internationale de philosophie 28 (1974), 511-531.
Lambert, Richard, “Berkeley’s use of the relativity argument,”
Idealistic Studies (1980), 107-121.
Lambert, Richard, “The literal intent of Berkeley’s Dialogues,”
Philosophy and Literature 6 (1982).
Lamers, Robert, “Berkeley and Schopenhauer,” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch
(1981), 120-143.
Leary, David E., “Berkeley’s social theory: context and development,”
Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977), 635-649.
Lebrun, G., “Berkeley ou le sceptique malgré lui,” Manuscrito 11
(1988), 33-48.
Leduc-Fayette, Denise. “Qu’est-ce que ‘parler aux yuex’? Berkeley et le
‘langage optique’,” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger
4 (1997), 409-427.
Lee, R. N., “What Berkeley’s notions are,” Idealistic Studies 20
(1990), 19-41.
Lennon, T. M., “Berkeley and the ineffable.” Syntheses 75 (1988),
231-250.
Lennon, T. M., “George Berkeley and the act-object distinction,”
Dialogue 40 (2001), 651-667.
Lavine, Michael, “How to make a mistake,” Philosophia 22 (1993),
29-37.
Levin, David Michael, ed., Sites of Vision (Cambridge, Ma: MIT
Press, 1997).
Levine, Michael, “Berkeley’s theocentric mentalism: pantheism?,”
Sophia (1987), 30-41.
Levine, Michael and Levi, Neil. “Robinson on Berkeley: ‘bad faith’ or
naive idealism?,” Idealistic Studies 22 (1992), 163-178.
Levy, David M., “Bishop Berkeley exorcises the infinite: fuzzy
consequences of strict finitism,” Hume Studies 18 (1992),
511-536.
Levy, David M., “ ‘Magic Buffalo’ and Berkeley’s ‘Theory of Vision’:
learning in society,”
Hume Studies
19 (1993), 223-226.
Leyvraz, Jean-Pierre, “La notion de Dieu chex Berkeley,” Revue de
theologie et de philosophie (1980), 241-252.
Lievers, Menno, “The Molyneux problem,” Journal of the History of
Philosophy 30 (1992), 399-416.
Llamas-Gómez, Clara Isabel, “Introduction to ‘Berkeley’s Crossroads’,”
Berkeley Newsletter 14 (1995/96), 1-4.
Lloyd, Peter B., Consciousness and Berkeley’s metaphysics
(London: Ursa, 1999).
Lloyd, Peter B., Paranormal phenomena and Berkeley’s metaphysics
(London: Ursa, 1999).
Lord, S. K., “Berkeleian linguistics,” Linguistics 213 (1978),
5-28.
Louet, D., “La critique de l’absolutisme newtonien chez Leibniz et
Berkeley,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 93 (1988), 447-468.
Lucash, Frank S., “The nature of mind,” Giornale di Metafisica 13
(1991), 89-107.
Luce, A. A., “Berkeley and the living thing,” Hermathena 123
(1977), 19-25.
Luce, J. V., “Yale College and the acquisition of Whitehall,”
Berkeley Newsletter
15 (1997/98), 19-22.
Lutterfelds, Wilhelm, “Kant oder Berkeley? Zum aktuellen Streit um den
korrecten Realismus,” Perspektiven der Philosophie 22 (1996),
305-340.
Lyons, William, “Dysart Castle: George Berkeley’s childhood home,”
Berkeley Newsletter 12 (1991/92), 11-15.
Mahon, James Edwin, “Review of The Rhetoric of Berkeley’s Philosophy
by Peter Walmsley,”
Berkeley Newsletter
14 (1995/96), 15-17.
Maia Neto, José R., “Academic skepticism in early modern philosophy,”
Journal of the History of Ideas 58 (1997), 199-220.
Malherbe, Michel,
“Husserl critique de Berkeley,” Revue philosophique de la France et
de l’étranger (1986), 355-366.
Malherbe, Michel, “La critique husserlienne des idées abstraites selon
Berkeley,”
History of European Ideas
7 (1986), 623-632.
Mall, Ram Adhar, Der operative Begriff des Geistes: Locke, Berkeley,
Hume (Freiburg, Breisgau: Alber, 1984).
Mancino, Michele, “Il Mezzogiorno nei diari (1717) del ‘Viaggio in
Italia’ di George Berkeley,” in Atti delle giornate di studio: Il
turismo culturale in Campania (Napoli, Quaderni dell’Università
degli studi “Federico II”, 2004), 271-304.
Mathauser, Zdenek, “The theory of reflection in aesthetics and the
heritage of George Berkeley” (in Czechoslovakian), Estetika 11
(1974), 30-52.
Mattey, G. J., “Kant’s conception of Berkeley’s idealism,”
Kantstudien 74 (1983), 161-175.
McCracken, Charles J., “What does Berkeley’s God see in the quad?,”
Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 61 (1979), 280-292.
McCracken, Charles J., Malebranche and British Philosophy
(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983).
McCracken, Charles J., “Berkeley’s conception of idea
[Abstract],” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985), 14-16.
McCracken, Charles, “Berkeley’s notion of spirit,” History of
European Ideas 7 (1986), 597-602.
McCracken, Charles J., "Stages on a Cartesian Road to Immaterialism,"
Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (1986), 19-40.
McCracken, Charles J., “Berkeley’s Cartesian concept of mind: the return
through Malebranche and Locke to Descartes,” Monist 71 (1988),
596-611.
McCracken, Charles J., “Berkeley on the relation of ideas to the mind,”
in Cummins and Zoeller (1992), 187-200.
McCracken, Charles J., “Godless immaterialism: on Atherton’s Berkeley,”
in Muehlmann (1995), 249-260.
McCracken, Charles J., "Demons that deceive, gods that perceive, and the
limits of skepticism," in Brykman (1997), 73-89.
McCracken, Charles J., “Knowledge of the existence of bodies,” in Garber
(1998), 624-648.
McCracken, Charles and Tipton, Ian, eds., Berkeley’s Principles and
Dialogues: background source materials (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2000).
McCracken, Charles J., "George Berkeley," in Companion to Early
Modern Philosophy, ed. Steven Nadler (Oxford: Blackwell, 2002),
437-55.
McGowan, William, “The dream of Ezra Stiles: Bis |
